Read here

Elements of morals

Paul Janet · 1884 · Scanned text · Free in the US

133,521 words · about 9 h 21 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Free in the US: this text is in the public domain in the United States; it may still be in copyright elsewhere.

Licence: PD · Library of Congress states the book is in the public domain and free to use and reuse (https://data.labs.loc.gov/digitized-books/README.html); published 1884, public domain asserted for the US only · Library of Congress, Selected Digitized Books (https://www.loc.gov/item/10006339); text via the Common Pile (CC BY 4.0 compilation, per-document rights preserved)

Text from Library of Congress, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Paul Janet
Language
English
Published
1884
Length
133,521 words · about 9 h 21 min
Sections
8 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain in the United States

 

Contents (8)

Continue:

Preface

THE Elements de Morale, by M. Paul Janet, which we here present to the educational world, translated from the latest edition, is, of all the works of that distinguished moralist, the one best adapted to college and school purposes. Its scholarly and methodical arrangement, its clear and direct reasonings, its felicitous examples and illustrations, drawn with rare impartiality from the best ancient and modern writers, make of this study of Ethics, generally so unattractive to young students, one singularly inviting. It is a system of morals, practical rather than theoretical, setting forth man's duties and the application thereto of the moral law. Starting with Preliminary JVotions, M. Janet follows these up with a general division of duties, establishes the general principles of social and individual morality, and chapter by chapter moves from duties to duties, developing each in all its ramifications with unerring clearness, decision, and completeness. Never before, perhaps, was this diihcult subject brought to the comprehension of the student with more convincing certainty, and, at the same time, with more vivid and impressive illustrations.

The position of M. Paul Janet is that of the i-eligious moralist.

" He supplies," says a writer in the British Quarterly Review* in a notice of his Theory of Morals, " the very element

IV PREFACE.

to which Mr. Sully gives so little place. He cannot conceive morals without religion. Stated shortly, his position is, that moral good is founded upon a natural and essential good, and that the domains of good and of duty are absolutely equivalent. So far he would seem to follow Kant ; but he diiFers from Kant in denying that there are indefinite duties : every duty, he holds, is definite as to its form ; but it is either definite or indefinite as to its application. As religion is simply belief in the Divine goodness, morality must by necessity lead to religion, and is like a flowerless plant if it fail to do so. He holds with Kant that practical faith in the existence of God is the postulate of the moral law. The two things exist or fall together."

This, as to M. Janet's position as a moralist; as to his manner of treating his subject, the writer adds :

" . . . it is beyond our power to set forth, with approach to success, the admirable series of reasonings and illustrations by which his positions are established and maintained."

M. Janet's signal merit is the clearness and decision which he gives to the main points of his subject, keeping them ever distinctly in view, and strengthening and supplementing them by substantial and conclusive facts, drawn from the best sources, framing, so to say, liis» idea in time-honored and irrefutable truths.

The law of duty thus made clear to the comprehension of the student, cannot fail to fix his attention ; and between fiixing the attention and striking root, the difference is not very great.

G. K. G.

TABLE OF OOWTENTS.

CHAPTER PAGE

I. — Preliminary Notions 1

II. — Division of Duties. — General Principles of Social Morality 33

III. — Duties of Justice. — Duties toward Human Life 50

IV. — Duties Concerning the Property of Others 63

V. — Duties toward the Liberty and toward the Honor of Others. — Justice, Distributive and Remunerative. —

Equity 93

VI.— Duties of Charity and Self -Sacrifice Ill

VII.— Duties toward the State 139

VIII.— Professional Duties 157

IX. — Duties of Nations among themselves. — International

Law 182

X.— Family Duties 190

XI. — Duties toward One's Self. — Duties relative to the Body. 223

XII. — Duties relative to External Goods. ... 244

XIII.— Duties relative to the Intellect 260

XIV.— Duties relative to the Will 281

XV.— Religious Morality. — Religious Rights and Duties 299

XVI. — Moral Medicine and Gymnastics 315

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…