Read here

The Reign of William Rufus and the Accession of Henry the First, Volume 1 (of 2)

Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus) · Public domain text

243,798 words · about 17 h 4 min to read

About this edition

The text of The Reign of William Rufus and the Accession of Henry the First, Volume 1 (of 2) comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #67458. It is public domain in the United States. Project Gutenberg’s header and license text are removed, and RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This text-only edition leaves out 8 illustrations. See the illustrated edition at Project Gutenberg.

This book is long enough to be split into 5 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Author
Edward A. Freeman (1823–1892)
Language
English
Subjects
Great Britain › History › Henry I, 1100-1135, Great Britain › History › William II, Rufus, 1087-1100, William II, King of England, 1056?-1100, Henry I, King of England, 1068-1135, Great Britain › History › Norman period, 1066-1154, Normans › Great Britain
Length
243,798 words · about 17 h 4 min
Sections
11 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (11)

The opening of Preface

I have now been able to carry out the design which I spoke of in the Prefaces to the fifth volume and to the second edition of the fourth volume of my History of the Norman Conquest. I have endeavoured to work out in detail the two sides of the memorable years with which I deal in these volumes, their deep importance for general and specially for constitutional history, and their rich store of personal and local narrative. In the former aspect, I believe I may claim to be the first to have dealt at length with the history of Bishop William of Saint-Calais, a history of deep constitutional importance in itself, and more important still with reference to the career of Anselm. It is no small matter to be able to show that it was not Anselm, but Anselm’s enemy, who was the first to appeal from an English court to the see of Rome. In this matter I have, I trust, brought out into its full importance a piece of history which has never, as far as I know, been told at length by any modern writer, though Dr. Stubbs has shown full appreciation of its constitutional bearings.

Read on in Part 1 →