Read here

The history of the Norman conquest of England, its causes and its results, Volume 3 (of 6)

Edward A. Freeman · Public domain text

300,293 words · about 21 h 2 min to read

Cover of The history of the Norman conquest of England, its causes and its results, Volume 3 (of 6)

Text only · 3 illustrations omitted. Illustrated source.

About this edition

The text of The history of the Norman conquest of England, its causes and its results, Volume 3 (of 6) comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #78122. It is in English and public domain in the United States. Project Gutenberg’s header and license text are removed, and RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This text-only edition leaves out 3 illustrations. See the illustrated edition at Project Gutenberg.

This book is long enough to be split into 7 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Author
Edward A. Freeman (1823–1892)
Language
English
Subjects
Normans › England, Great Britain › History › Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066, Hastings, Battle of, England, 1066, Great Britain › History › Norman period, 1066-1154
Length
300,293 words · about 21 h 2 min
Sections
17 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (17)

The opening of Preface

The appearance of this volume has been delayed for a considerable time in order to obtain for it a special advantage, namely an accurate military ground-plan of the battle-field of Senlac. For this my best thanks are owing to Colonel Sir Henry James, R.E. and to Captain Edward R. James, R.E. I had, on June 2nd, the great advantage of a final examination of the battle-ground in company with Captain James and Mr. Bryce. My account of the battle was then already printed, but I am glad to say that our examination led only to one or two small changes which I have made in the Additions and Corrections. Captain James has had the kindness to put my ideas of the battle, as drawn from the original writers, into scientific military shape. He is not responsible for my historical view of the battle, neither am I responsible for such purely military points as the extent and arrangement of the palisade. The relative position of the different divisions in the two armies seems beyond doubt, but the extent of ground occupied by each division must be matter of pure conjecture.

Read on in Part 1 →