Read here

The Mediaeval Mind (Volume 1 of 2) A History of the Development of Thought and Emotion in the Middle Ages

Taylor, Henry Osborn · Public domain text

254,123 words · about 17 h 48 min to read

About this edition

The text of The Mediaeval Mind (Volume 1 of 2) A History of the Development of Thought and Emotion in the Middle Ages comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #43880. It is public domain in the United States. Project Gutenberg’s header and license text are removed, and RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This book is long enough to be split into 7 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Author
Henry Osborn Taylor (1856–1941)
Language
English
Subjects
Civilization, Medieval, Middle Ages, Philosophy, Medieval
Length
254,123 words · about 17 h 48 min
Sections
26 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (26)

The opening of Preface

The Middle Ages! They seem so far away; intellectually so preposterous, spiritually so strange. Bits of them may touch our sympathy, please our taste; their window-glass, their sculpture, certain of their stories, their romances,--as if those straitened ages really were the time of romance, which they were not, God knows, in the sense commonly taken. Yet perhaps they were such intellectually, or at least spiritually. Their terra--not for them incognita, though full of mystery and pall and vaguer glory--was not the earth. It was the land of metaphysical construction and the land of spiritual passion. There lay their romance, thither pointed their veriest thinking, thither drew their utter yearning.

Is it possible that the Middle Ages should speak to us, as through a common humanity? Their mask is by no means dumb: in full voice speaks the noble beauty of Chartres Cathedral. Such mediaeval product, we hope, is of the universal human, and therefore of us as well as of the bygone craftsmen. Why it moves us, we are not certain, being ignorant, perhaps, of the building’s formative and earnestly intended meaning. Do we care to get at that?

Read on in Part 1 →