Read here

An essay on elocution

Samuel Kirkham · 1856 · Scanned text

148,452 words · about 10 h 24 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Licence: PD · Library of Congress states the book is in the public domain and free to use and reuse (https://data.labs.loc.gov/digitized-books/README.html); published 1856, author long deceased · Library of Congress, Selected Digitized Books (https://www.loc.gov/item/ca34001845); text via the Common Pile (CC BY 4.0 compilation, per-document rights preserved)

Text from Library of Congress, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Samuel Kirkham
Language
English
Published
1856
Length
148,452 words · about 10 h 24 min
Sections
110 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain

 

Contents (110)
  1. Front matter about 3 min
  2. Preface about 21 min
  3. PART I.— Elocution about 2 min
  4. PART II. — Selections in Prose and Poetry. Page Paragraphs in Prose, 155 about 16 min
  5. Chapter I Of Articulation about 2 min
  6. Chap. I. ELEMENTARY SOUNDS. 23 about 52 min
  7. Chapter II Of Tones And Modulation about 3 min
  8. Chap. II. OF TONES AND MODULATION. 55 about 21 min
  9. Chapter III. Inflections Of The Voice about 3 min
  10. Chap. III. INFLECTIONS OF THE VOICE. 69 about 1 h
  11. Chapter IV. Of Force, Accent, And Emphasis about 3 min
  12. Chap. IV. VANISHING FORCE OR STRESS. 107 about 34 min
  13. Chapter V Of Time, And Rhetorical Pauses about 6 min
  14. Chap. V. RHETORICAL PAUSES. 133 about 22 min
  15. Chapter VI. Of Rhetorical Action about 3 min
  16. Chap. VI. OF GESTURE. 149 about 10 min
  17. Chapter I. Selections In Prose And Poetry Section I about 3 min
  18. Chap. I. SELECT PARAGRAPHS. 157 Bmiker-Hill Monument about 2 min
  19. Section II. Select Paragraphs about 4 min
  20. SECTION III. Injustice of Revenge. — dr. johnson about 4 min
  21. SECTION IV. Female Fortitude. — irving about 3 min
  22. Section V. Paragraphs In Verse about 1 min
  23. SECTION VI. The Family Altar. — burns about 2 min
  24. Section VII about 2 min
  25. SECTION VIII. Anticipation. — campeeli about 2 min
  26. SECTION 1. Hamlefs reflections on Yoricl^s scull. — Shakspeare about 1 min
  27. SECTION II. Refections on the Tomb of Shakspeare. — Irving about 2 min
  28. SECTION III. On Studies. — Lord Bacon about 3 min
  29. SECTION IV. Liberty and Slavery. — Sterne about 1 min
  30. Chap. II. ON THE STARRY HEAVENS. 173 about 1 min
  31. SECTION V. On the Starry Heavens. — Flint about 6 min
  32. Section VI about 2 min
  33. SECTION VII. Affection for the Dead. — Irvixg about 3 min
  34. Section VIII about 5 min
  35. SECTION IX. Bunker-Hill Monument. — Webster about 3 min
  36. SECTION X. Hezekiah, King of Judah. — Gleig about 7 min
  37. SECTION XI. Psalm 137 about 2 min
  38. SECTION XII. Cardinal Wolsey's Soliloquy on Ambition. — Shakst-eare about 1 min
  39. SECTION XIII. Cardinal Wolsey's Farewell Address to Cromwell, Shakspeare about 1 min
  40. SECTION XIV. Hohejilinden. — Campbell about 1 min
  41. SECTION XV. The Burial of Sir John Moore. — Wolfe about 1 min
  42. SECTION XVI. Messiah. — Pope about 4 min
  43. SECTION XVII. On receiving his Mother's Picture. — Cowper about 6 min
  44. SECTION XIX. To the Sides. — Bryant about 1 min
  45. SECTION XX. The Musick of the Ocean. — Walsh's National Gazette about 1 min
  46. SECTION XXI. The Ocean, at the Resurrection Morn. — Pollo-ca about 3 min
  47. SECTION XXII. Address to the Ocean. — Byron about 3 min
  48. Section I about 3 min
  49. SECTION II. Intellectual Qualities of Milton. — Channing about 1 min
  50. Chap. III. INTELLECTUAL QUALITIES OF MILTON. 200 about 4 min
  51. Section IV about 6 min
  52. Section V about 4 min
  53. Section VI about 4 min
  54. SECTION VII. On Eloquence. — Wirt about 6 min
  55. SECTION VIII. Caspar Hauser about 18 min
  56. SECTION X. Caspar Hauser — Continued about 19 min
  57. SECTION XI. Traits of Indian Character. — Ikving about 7 min
  58. SECTION XII. Traits of Indian Character — Continued. — Ib about 7 min
  59. Section XIII about 2 min
  60. SECTION XIV. Speech of Farmer's Brother about 2 min
  61. Section XV about 3 min
  62. SECTION XVI. Psalm 90 about 2 min
  63. SECTION XVII. St.Johji, chapter 12 about 1 min
  64. SECTION XVIII. There 's nothing true but Heaven. — Moore about 1 min
  65. SECTION XIX. The Soul in Eternity. — Byron about 1 min
  66. SECTION XX. Henry the Fourth's Soliloquy on Sleep. — Siiakspeare about 1 min
  67. SECTION XXI. Apostrophe to Light. — Milton about 2 min
  68. SECTION XXII. Darkness. — Byron about 3 min
  69. SECTION XXIII. LochieVs Warning. — Campbell about 4 min
  70. SECTION XXIV. Elegy written in a Country Churchyard. — Gray about 5 min
  71. Section XXV about 1 min
  72. SECTION I. Dedications.— -Lord Bacon about 1 min
  73. Chap. IV. WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 26? under 1 min
  74. SECTION II. Reflections on Westminster Abbey. — Addisox about 4 min
  75. SECTION III. Refections on Westminster Abbey — Extract. — Irving about 4 min
  76. SECTION IV. On Subscribing for Books about 4 min
  77. SECTION V. On Natural and Fantastical Pleasures. — Guardian about 7 min
  78. SECTION VI. Thoughts on Death. — Loed Bacon about 10 min
  79. SECTION VII. Ugly Women. — New Monthly Magazine about 5 min
  80. SECTION VIII. Ugly Women. — Continued about 6 min
  81. SECTION IX. PhilosopJiy of Apparitions. — Quarterly Review about 5 min
  82. SECTION X. Philosophy of Apparitions — Continued. — lb about 5 min
  83. Section XI about 2 min
  84. Section XII about 2 min
  85. SECTION XIII. Rolla's Speech to the Peruvians. — Sheridan about 1 min
  86. SECTION XIV. Speech of Caius Marius to the Romans about 6 min
  87. Section XV about 3 min
  88. Section XVI about 2 min
  89. Section XVII about 6 min
  90. SECTION XVIII. The Broken Heart, — Irving about 16 min
  91. Section XIX about 2 min
  92. SECTION XX. Antony 's Oration over Cesar^s Dead Body. — Siiakspeare about 3 min
  93. Section XXI about 1 min
  94. Section XXII about 1 min
  95. Section XXIII about 2 min
  96. SECTION XXIV. Hamlefs Soliloqvy on Death. — Siiakspeare about 1 min
  97. SECTION XXV. Cato's Soliloquy on the Immortality of the Soul. — Addison about 1 min
  98. SECTION XXVI. The Dying Christian to his Soul.— " >pe under 1 min
  99. SECTION I. The Alhambra hy Moonlight.— Irving about 3 min
  100. Chap. V. MOSLEM DOMINATION". 325 about 5 min
  101. SECTION III. Thoughts on Hand-Writing. — Verplanck about 10 min
  102. SECTION IV. The Monk, — Sterne about 4 min
  103. SECTION V. Story of Le Fever. — Sterne about 15 min
  104. Section VI about 2 min
  105. SECTION VII. Superiority of Christianity over Paganism.— ib about 6 min
  106. Section IX about 6 min
  107. SECTION X. The same subject continued. — ib about 9 min
  108. SECTION XII. Address to Greece. — Byron about 2 min
  109. SECTION XIII. The Passions. — Collins about 3 min
  110. SECTION XIV Alexander 1 s Feast ; or, The Power of Mustek about 9 min

Continue:

Front matter

Y ON ELOgUTLON^

* w DESIGNED

A*

Preface

A preface is to the reader, what a fence is to a horse, when it obstructs his progress to a field of sprouting herbage, which he consider? himself justifiable to enter by leaping over the barrier. The reader wades through a long preface with as much reluctance, as he would pass through the ordeal of a ceremonious introduction to a large assemblage of guests, when'invited to dine with a stranger. This repugnance to preface-reading, doubtless, arises.outof the fact, that prefaces are generally dull, and often but the prelude to a still duller book.

To the author, a preface is considered as privileged ground. Upon this arena, he deems himself at liberty to act without restraint— to tyrannise over the time and patience of his reader, by giving a loose rein to his fancy, and by pursuing a course as wayward and foreign to the subject before him as either his pedantry or his vanity may dictate. In the after pages of his work, he considers himself under obligation occasionally to cast a sidelong glance at the subject he is professing to discuss, and to pay some little respect to the laws of unity, and to a systematick arrangement of his thoughts. We cannot, therefore, but admire this bountiful provision secured to him by the power of custom, by which provision he is allowed, after having toiled through the tedious task of manufacturing a ponderous volume, here to throw off the shackles, and revel over this licensed corner of his field, and become as familiar, and egotistical, and inane, as his conscience and common sense will permit. But it might be well for some writers (myself included, undoubtedly) to consider that custom is a fickle dame, and that reason is not always found in alliance with her.

On this subject, however, custom has not been so parsimonious as to confine her liberality exclusively to the author. If she has granted him the privilege of being dull and prolix in his preface, she has as obligingly favoured the reader with the privilege of escaping from his prefatory dulness and prolixity, by skipping over them, and by commencing at the proper beginning of his book. And now, with becoming candour, 1 announce to my very gentle reader, that if he begins to grow weary of my own prosing, I shall not deem it unkind or uncourteous in him, should he avail himself of his privilege by breaking off at the close of this sentence, and by turning over to the pages which follow this my prelusive disemboguement ; for, on the score of prolixity, I do hi .tc t myself bound, under cover of my privilege, to show him any mercy, have on hand a bundle of disorderly and incoherent ideas, which are quite clamorous to be released from bondage ; and being very conscientious, and compassionate withal, I seldom have the hardihood to turn a deaf ear to the cries of the distressed. It is, therefore, altogether for the purpose of fulfilling a moral duty, that I give these fugitives their freedom, and allot them a place in this, the most suitable, part of my work.

Prefaces generally open with a stupid apology for the sin of boring the public k with another book. But a book should be its own and its only apologist. If it is well written, and its subject is important, it needs no apology; but if the reverse — if its manufacturer has arrogated to himself the dignity and responsibility of authorship, without considering

4 PREFACE.

whether he is able to manage his subject in a more masterly manner than his predecessors'have done, or even if he has deceived himself in his estimate of his own abilities, an apology, so far from shielding him from rebuke for his daring perpetrations with pen and ink, will hut seive as so much dead weight to sink still lower his drowning cause.

An apology is generally deemed a mark of modesty in an author ; but whether he render in this token of diffidence as an atonement for the transgression of thrusting himself between his predecessors and the publick, or -whether he boldly assert his superiority over them, is of little moment ; for, by the very act of writing and publishing, he assumes such superiority.

Of all the "labours done under the sun," the labour's of the pen meet with the poorest reward. Even in this age of much light and more reading, an author is often compelled to live on short allowance, and trudge on foot, whilst his more fortunate bookseller revels in luxury and rolls along in his coach. An ignorant fellow may, easily grow rich by selling almanacks, tape, toys, turnips, and teakettles, where a talented author would starve.

Writers of dull books, however, if patronised at all, are rewarded be yond their deserts. We are under no obligation to sympathize with those authors who have " passed their nights without sleep, in order te procure it for their readers." The cumbrous labours of such men prove unavailing, from an apparently trifling difference of opinion between them and the world which they attempt to enlighten. With an honest zeal they maintain, that their productions are brilliant, but the world perversely denounces them as execrable : and thus, merely by being outvoted, their ponderous tomes soon lumber down into the tomb of forgetful n ess. As in raising grain, the quantity of sound wheat is dimin ished -by a rank growth of the straw, so, in the production of books the amount of solid information they contain, seems to decrease in pro portion to the fecundity of the crop.

By reflecting upon the pains and penalties of book-making, and tin deplorable fate which awaits the vast majority of those who join the craft, one might naturally conclude, that the experiment of authorship has become so hazardous as to deter fresh adventurers from entering the field ; but such a conclusion is so far from being justified by facts, that it would seem as if the number of authors were increased in i ratio corresponding with the increase of the difficulties and danger> which beset their path. Indeed, in modern times, authorship has be come a mania, or, perhaps I should say, an epidemick, which appears t< be infectious, and which threatens to inundate our land, and leave it en cumbered with sand and rubbish.

To the no small annoyance of the community, this alarming malad) has particularly affected the honourable fraternity of teachers; and thereby plunged many a thriving family into deep — mystification and doubt. When one of them happens to blunder on to the track of a straggling idea that he deems unique, or to get hold of a foolish conceit, or a new-fangled notion, every intellectual current in his cranium runs riot, and gives him no rest, until he has it written out and— printed. Hence, the onerous amount of maudlin abortions in the shape of school-books which is- annually disgorged from the press. Without once taking into consideration the enormous difference between carping at the deficiencies, and condemning the faults, of others, and that of avoiding faults and supplying deficiencies, and, losing sight, also, of the important

uism, that knowledge derived from experience, in order to subserve

PREFACE. 5

any useful purpose either in authorship, or in its application to business, must be drawn from successful experience, many of these book-mongers seem to take it for granted, that, to be able to raise plausible objections to the books that have fallen in their way, and to profess experience in teaching a particular science, constitute the grand climacterick of all that is requisite in order to form a successful writer upon that science. But it is not the man who has merely taught, or who has taught long, or who is able to point out defects in authors, that is capable of enlightening the world in the respective sciences which have engaged his attention ; but the man who has taught wdl. It is the man of genius and enterprise, he who has brought to the task of his calling uncommon powers of discrimination and a sound judgment, and whose ambition has led him, not to rest satisfied with following the tedious routine of his predecessors, but to strike out a new and a better track, or, at least, to render smoother and brighter the path long trodden. It is to such men, and such only, that we are indebted for all our great improvements in the cons! ruction of elementary works for schools and private learners.

Book-makers are too often like office-seekers, who first procure the place, and tnen oethink themselves of the qualifications necessary to the discharge of its duties. They too frequently set down merely to make a book, without considering, either the importance of the undertaking, or whether they possess the qualifications requisite for its successful accomplishment. But the course pursued by such writers, is as evidently inverted as that which would induce one to read a discourse backwards, or to commence a speech with the peroration, and close it with the exordium, or to attempt to discover the sources of the Nile, by strolling down the banks of the Scamander. There is not, perhaps, a more prevalent and mischievous errour than that which supposes the writers of bad books to be an innocent set of beings, who do little or no harm, unless, indeed, it is that which imagines that the authors of good books, are generally rewarded according to their merit. Bad books are like bad medicines, which, when they do no good, are sure to produce ill effects. If bad books were entirely neutral, they would, of course, have no evil tendency ; but the misfortune is, they are much read, and lead- their unfortunate votaries into errour. One who is pursuing the path of errour, is certainly farther from truth than he was before he set out, for it leads directly from her temple ; and before he can enter this temple, he has to retrace his steps.

But does not the publick always discriminate between merit and demerit, and distribute its rewards accordingly 1 Far from it. The publick is, indeed, a potent umpire, and one that opens a liberal purse to itsyavouriies ; but to its greatest benefactors, it generally proves a heartless tyrant, by taking care, that they shall first be duly starved to death, and then handed over to posterity for their rewards, which come in the shape of monuments, reared to perpetuate their memories.

The truth is, the general mass are not proper judges of books. Hence, their liability to be deceived. How often are they robbed of their time, by poring over pages of trifling, inane, and uninstructive matter — to the perversion of their taste, and the debasement of their minds — when this mispent time, were it devoted to the perusal of works filled with sound sense and solid instruction, would afford them an intellectual banquet from which they might arise with minds refreshed and richly stored with that wisdom which adorns and dignifies human nature, elevates man to his proper rank in the scale of being, and qualifies him to fulfil, with honour and usefulness, his various offices in life. I*

D PREFACE.

But school-books, more especially, as they fall into the hands of children and youth — of such as peculiarly need lights to guide them, and encouragements to excite them, when defective or erroneous, are more pernicious than any others ; for they prove either false guides, which lead their readers astray, or no guides, which leave them in darkness. Hence, such books are worse than no books. What, then, is to be done, in order to avert the evil influence of bad books — an evil which has been' rapidly increasing ever since Cadmus had the kindness to invent letters 1 — If this evil cannot be remedied, surely it may be easily retarded in its progress. Let parents, and guardians, and publick functionaries, at once set themselves at work to elevate the profession of school-keeping to the rank and dignity of the other, less important, learned professions, by increasing the salaries of instructers, so much as to enlist in this noble cabling, none but men of genuine talents and truly liberal acquirements, and, not only will bad books soon hide their diminished heads, but the youth of our country will receive twice as good an education as they now do, at a less expense, because, in a. far shorter lime.

When we reflect upon the mighty influence which early impressions have over the minds and conduct of men, the importance of putting good books into the hands of the young, as well as, of giving them proper, oral instructions, presents itself with increased magnitude. Errours imbibed in early life, are seldom rooted out in riper years. As a mere pebble may turn the course of a stream at the fountain-head, so, a virtuous hint, or a poisonous errour, instilled into the mind of a youth, may not only influence his career through this life, by directing him into the path of honour and usefulness, or by leading him into the road of infamy and disgrace, but its influence may extend to his well or ill being through the endless ages of eternity.

It may be justly said, that teachers and authors, in no small degree, preside over the destinies of a free people. According to the bias which they give to the minds of those who receive instructions from them, they either exalt or lower the dignity of a nation. How high a meed of praise, then, does he merit, whose labours are successful in improving our systems of learning in such a manner as to give a new impetus to the intellectual energies of the rising generation ! The seeds of knowledge which he sows, will be continually springing up in a more and more genial soil, as generation succeeds generation, and will produce more and more abundantly those luxu riant germes of liberty and science which adorn, and beautify, and polish, and exalt a free people. The benefits of his labours will shine forth with increasing lustre through those brilliant geniuses who will hereafter arise and pour fresh floods of light into the moral world — streams that will blaze along the track of time, bearing light and glory down to the remotest posterity.

When we take into consideration the vast and growing resources of our country, and associate them with the intellectual advancement she has already made, it may not be altogether forlorn to hope, nor chimerical to suppose, that the day is not remote in which the attention of our statesmen and publick functionaries generally, will be more singly directed to the all-important object of raising our literary character to a far loftier height than has hitherto been attained by any nation. In such a day of prosperity as this, when it has become a moot point of national legislation how to dispose of surplus revenue — when the highest honours and rewards await the man of genius and scientifick enterprise, what but the want of enlightened views and liberal measures can prevent literary, and scientifick, and political, and religious knowledge, from soon

PREFACE. 7

llDwing through our land in channels broad and deep — knowledge, pure as the mountain rill, abundant as the waters of the ocean 1 What but the want of such views and such measures, can prevent this republick from soon raising a literary, as well as a political, standard, that shall wave as a proud beacon to all the nations of the earth 1 I must confess my unwillingness to abandon the hope, that to us such a day of national prosperity and literary pre-eminence is rapidly rolling on — aday in which our statesmen will become far more enlightened and liberalized; when talented authors will be more substantially encouraged; the profession of teaching, elevated ; and bad books, discarded ; when our national dignity, rising in its literary greatness, will shed an undying halo of glory around our political horizon ; when our publick institutions will extend their civilizing, and humanizing, and christianizing influence over every island, sea, and mountain, and penetrate the remotest corners of the earth — a day in which Europe, Asia, and Africa, will thankfully look up to her for light and direction, and be proud to imitate her noble example — an era of literary redemption, and the advent of science, in which national prejudices will be overthrown, national animosities, trampled down, national restrictions, rescinded, and the sons of science rise up in every republick, and kingdom, and country, and hold communion at the fountain of Apollo — in short, a literary millennium, in which the Alps will salute the Alleganies, the Himalayas will make obeisance to the Andes, the Niger, the Volga, the Ganges, and the Nile, will claim kindred with the Columbia, the Mississippi, and the Colorado, and the waters of the Caspian and of the Superiour, will rise up and embrace each other.

Courteous reader, lest, by this time, you may think me inclined to be garrulous, if not flighty, upon topicks quite foreign to the subject before me, I will now put a bridle upon my wayward thoughts, and lead them directly into the channel marked out for preface-makers by the good old rules of criticism. Possibly the following pages will justify the conclusion, that the author of them does not possess the qualifications which he has prescribed as indispensable to the successful writer ; and that, whilst he deals out his censures to others with an unsparing hand, he is himself guilty of greater faults than those he condemns. Every one knows how much easier it is to point out faults, than to produce original excellences. But whatever may be the defects of the work now merging into being, as author and compiler of it, I have one strong consolation, which is, that its utility will not depend alone on the efforts of my own talents. If the pages penned by myself, present little that is new and useful, a redeeming virtue may be claimed, by presenting in those which follow, much that has been long tried in the crucible of criticism, and which, like pure gold, has been found always to grow brighter by the process of refining.

It may not be altogether inappropriate, in passing, for me to explain (he grounds on which is based the presumption of my coming forward to enrol my humble name upon the list of authors on Elocution. It is well known, that, but a few years ago, the tide of grammatical science, as it pertains to the English language, was at a verv low ebb in ourcountry, as well as in Great Britain. What the efforts of a few individuals have since done to swell this tide, and conduct it into the humblest walks of life, is equally known. Among those who have successfully laboured in the philological field, Mr. Lindley Murray stands forth in bold relief, undeniably at the head of the list. That the writer's own labours in the same field, have also contributed, in some degree, to

8 PREFACE.

effect that great revolution which has recently taken place with regard to the cultivation of grammatical science, and which so highly redounds to the honour and glory of the age in which we live, he is proud to believe. Since the days of Lowth, no other work on grammar, Murray's excepted, has been so favourably received by the publick as his own.

As one proof of this he would mention, that within the last six years } it has passed through Jifly editions* By its unfolding, and explaining, and applying the principles of grammar, it has brought this hitherto abstruse science within the reach of the humblest capacity, and thereby encouraged thousands, and tens of thousands, to acquire a knowledge of this important branch of learning, Avho, otherwise, would have passed it by with neglect.

In the interiour of Pennsylvania and the State of New York, in the Western States, in the lower regions of the Mississippi valley, and in many other sections of our country into which the author's work has penetrated, and become the general text-book in grammar, the number Df those who are now successfully cultivating a knowledge of this science, is nearly or quite twice as great as it was before his treatise was introduced; and in many neighbourhoods, it has more than quadrupled. This flattering success, then, of his first essay in authorship, has encouraged hiin to adventure upon another branch of science which, for some years past, has particularly engaged his attention. That he is capable of doing ample justice to his present subject, he has not the vanity to imagine; but if his knowledge drawn from observation, and experience in teaching elocution, enable him so to treat the science as to call the attention of some to its cultivation, and induce others more capable than himself to write upon it, he will thereby contribute his mite towards rescuing from neglect a branch of learning which, in its important bearings upon the prosperity of the free citizens of this great republiek, stands second to none : and thus, in the consciousness of having rendered a new service to his country, he will secure the reward of his highest ambition. Should this first edition be at all greeted by the friendsof science, he will endeavour to improve his work, and ultimately send it forth with less imperfections resting upon its head.

Some may think, that, in a [ew instances, the author has taken an undue liberty with the style of the writers whose labours he has appropriated. But when it is considered, that this work is designed chiefly to be read in schools, where grammatical improprieties would be extremely injurious to the germinating taste of the young reader, it will doubtless be conceded, that the sacrilege of disturbing the monuments of the dead — the profanation of removing a little of the rust and rubbish which adhere to the precious gems of an antiquated, or even of a modern, author, is, on the whole, a lighter transgression than either to neglect to furnish the rich banquet, or to get it up in a slovenly manner.

The scientiflck portion of this manual, is far more defective than it would have been, had not the author, since making arrangements fot publishingit,beenprevented,by unfavourable, unforeseen, and uncontrollable circumstances, from devoting- half that time and attention to its composition and arrangement, which even a tolerable degree of excellence in execution, required. His highest aim has been to treat the subject briefly and practically; and thereby to render his work useful to such as have but little leisure to devote to this science.

*It has now (1835) passed through over one hundred and twenty editions.

ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. \>

In the selected part, he has endeavoured to present such pieces as are calculated to cultivate the taste, enlighten the understanding, improve the judgment, and establish the morals of the young, and, at the same time, to inspire them with a fondness for reading, and a desire to excel in the science of elocution.

In conclusion, it affords the author no small degree of pleasure to acknowledge the obligation he is under to Dr. James Rush, who, with a liberality peculiar to superiour minds, and a courtesy exercised only by accomplished men, tendered to the author, in the compilation and arrangement of his work, such a use of his own, admirable treatise on the " Philosophy of the Human Voice," as he might think proper to make. This remark will sufficiently explain to the reader, the grounds of that license by which the author has drawn so many of his best materials from the rich depository alluded to.*

ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION.

Mankind are more frequently swayed by prejudice than reason. Reason has a clear eye ; but prejudice is blind, and either clings tenaciously to old doctrines and time-worn systems, or gropes forward in imminent danger of stumbling upon the dark mountains, of errour. Hence, tiew systems generally meet with more opposers than advocates; and lence, too, bad systems and false doctrines, on their first promulgation, s^ain as many proselytes as those that are genuine and useful. We aeed not wonder, then, that philosophers have been imprisoned, statesmen banished, poets starved, apostles beheaded, and that the Saviour of men was crucified, while dupes and impostors have been countenanced, honoured, and even deified. Nor need we be astonished that every successful improvement in science and the arts, has gained its popularity only by slow degrees. That reformer, therefore, who would succeed, must not attempt, at once, any great innovation. It is in accordance with this maxim, that I have undertaken to do but a little in the following Essay.

They who have long groped in the darkness of a dungeon, cannot bear to be suddenly ushered into the full glare of a noonday's sun. How can it be expected, then, that those who have hitherto been content to read, or rather, try to read, without a knowledge of any of the principles of reading, can be persuaded to adopt, at once, all the principles of the science'? Believing it better to do a. little good, than wo good, I have contented myself, for the present, with presenting to the publick, 07ily those principles of elocution that I deem most important in practice, leaving it for a future opportunity, or to those who may succeed me,

* It is the design of the Author to publish, in the course of a year or two, a Sequel to this work, ancf soon to follow that by a treatise on Rhetorics. He may likewise deem it advisable to publish an Introduction to this Essay.

10 ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION.

to give a more extensive and complete treatise upon the subject. To a man who is wandering in the dark, a farthing candle is better than no light.

Inattention to principles in our systems of instruction, has long been complained of by the discerning few; and, although some slight reformation in regard to this point, has taken place :;n our schools, yet the grer.t importance of it, is still, both by teachers and parents, too generally overlooked. That the examination and investigation of principles, in any art or science, are highly calculated to call into active exercise the reasoning faculties, is universally admitted. How inconsistent is it, then, to think of teaching children to read, without causing them to pay attention to the principles of reading ! — It is hoped that so gross an absurdity as this, will not much longer disgrace our schools and seminaries of learning.

■ The investigation and application of the principles of elocution, as well as the study of the principles of grammar, arithmetick, philosophy, phrenology, and so forth, tend not only to develop and expand the intellectual powers, but, also, in a pre-eminent degree, to cultivate the taste, and refine the mind.

We boast of our liberal institutions, and of our admirable form ol government : nay, more ; of our intelligence. It is admitted that we have done much for the cause of learning; but who cannot perceive, that much remains to be done before we can justly lay claim to that noble and refined excellence which ought to adorn a great, a prosperous, and a free people? Who will deny, that, in the general scramble after wealth, most of our citizens overlook the refined, the beautiful, in their too eager pursuit of the useful? Who will deny, that, with us, even at the present day, the standard value of every discovery and improvement in science and the arts, is not, (as it ought to be,) the amount it will add to the happiness of man — is not, its tendency to enlighten, to refine, to liberalize him, and elevate him in the scale of being ; but — its ability to improve his condition in the mere matter of dollars and cents? — and that most of our systems of education, as well as the branches taught in our schools, are exclusively shaped to this end 1 — Intelligence ! And is this our standard of intelligence, flowing from our boasted principles of enlightened freedom 1 Has refinement, has '"gance, nothing to do with national excellence, with national great- *s 2 Shall it any longer be said, that the breath of liberty blights the e a r *.?, and banishes refinement '? Shall American freemen merit • reproach of being a nation of misers ? — I leave it to the legislators A statesmen of our country to answer these interrogatories, and to % whether a state of prosperity has not arrived, which would justify nore liberal course of policy in regard to our school-systems and encouragement of the fine arts — a course embracing, not only the ful, but. also, the elegant: — and especially to decide, whether refinent of manners (which would naturally flow" from such a course of polii would be dangerous to the liberties of our country. ** To the teacher it may be proper to remark, that one hundred and hty pages of this third edition, exactly correspond with the same :>es of the second edition ; but that other parts of the work have beec arged, and slightly altered, and, it is hoped, for the better. In order prevent farther alterations, however, the work has been stereotyped.

PART I.— Elocution

Page Elocution— Introduction, - 15 Articulation, - - - - 21 Distinctness, 21

Of the Elementary Sounds, - 22 Of the Radical and Vanishing

Movement of the Voice, - - 24 Of the Tonick, Subtonick, and

Atonick elements, - - - 26 Diphthongs and Monothongs, 27 Of the formation of Syllables, - 28 Of the unaccented Vowel Sounds — defects in exploding them,

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…