Read here

The younger American poets

Jessie Belle Rittenhouse · 1904 · Scanned text · Free in the US

73,639 words · about 5 h 9 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Free in the US: this text is in the public domain in the United States; it may still be in copyright elsewhere.

Licence: PD · Library of Congress states the book is in the public domain and free to use and reuse (https://data.labs.loc.gov/digitized-books/README.html); published 1904, public domain asserted for the US only · Library of Congress, Selected Digitized Books (https://www.loc.gov/item/04032306); text via the Common Pile (CC BY 4.0 compilation, per-document rights preserved)

Text from Library of Congress, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Jessie Belle Rittenhouse
Language
English
Published
1904
Length
73,639 words · about 5 h 9 min
Sections
12 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain in the United States

 

Contents (12)
  1. Front matter under 1 min
  2. Foreword about 3 min
  3. Contents about 24 min
  4. II about 17 min
  5. III about 24 min
  6. IV about 30 min
  7. VI about 19 min
  8. VII about 39 min
  9. IX about 30 min
  10. XI about 19 min
  11. XII about 11 min
  12. XIII about 1 h 32 min

Continue:

Front matter

Ciass

Book__£

GopiglitS?-

Foreword

TO attempt, in one volume, to cover the entire field of present-day poetry in America, will be recognized the more readily as impossible when one reflects that in Mr. Stedman's American Anthology over five hundred poets are represented, of whom the greater number are still living and singing.

One may scarcely hope, then, in the space of one volume, to include more than a representative group, even when confining his study to the work of the younger poets, for within this class would fall the larger contingent named above. It has therefore been necessary to follow a general, though not arbitrary, standard of chronology, of which the most feasible seemed that adopted by Mr. Archer in his admirable study of the English " Poets of the Younger Generation," — the including only of such as have been born within the last halfcentury, and whose place is still in the making. The few remaining poets whose art has long since denned itself, such as Mr. Aldrich, Mr.

Vlll

Foreword

Stedman, and Mrs. Moulton, need no further interpretation ; nor does the long-acknowledged work of Mr. Richard Watson Gilder, nor that of James Whitcomb Riley, whose final criticism has been pronounced in every heart and at every hearth.

The work of Mr. Edwin Markham, the poet of democracy, whose fraternal songs embcdy many of the latter-day ideals, and that of John B. Tabb, the lapidary of modern verse, v^ho cuts with infinite care his delicate camecs of thought, were also beyond the chronological scheme of the volume. Nor of those who fell within its scope could a selection be made that would not seem to some invidious, since it must chance among so great a number that many would be omitted who should, with equal right, have been included ; it returns, therefore, to the earlier statement, that one must confine himself to a representative group, with whose work he chance to be most familiar, and upon which he has, therefore, the truer claim to speak.

It seemed, also, that the volume would have more value if it gave to a smaller number such a study as would differentiate and define their work, rather than to a larger group the passing comment of a few paragraphs. It was a great

Foreword

IX regret, however, that circumstances incident to the copyrights prevented me from including the admirable work of William Vaughn Moody, which reveals by its breadth, penetration, and purpose, the thinker and not the dreamer. Indeed, Mr. Moody's work, in its vitality of touch, fine imagination, and spiritual idealism, proves not only the creative poet but one to whom the nobler offices of Art have been entrusted, and the critic given to inquiring why the former tinier were better than these may well keep his eye upon the work of Mr. Moody.

It was also a regret that those inexorable arbiters, space and time, deprived me of the privilege of including the strongly individual work of Helen Gray Cone; the artistic, thoughtful verse of Anna Hempstead Branch ; the sincere ana sympathetic song of Virginia Woodward Cloud ; the spiritual verse of Lilian Whiting, with its interpretation of the higher imports ; the heartening, characteristic notes of Theodosia Garrison ; and the recently issued poems of Josephine Dodge Daskam, which prove beyond peradventure that the Muses, too, were at her christening, — indeed, the "Songs of Iseult Deserted," which form a group in her volume, are lyrics worthy of any hand.

X

Foreword

Had it been possible in the space at command, I should also have had pleasure in considering the work of Frank Dempster Sherman, who is not only an accomplished lyrist, but who has divined the heart of the child and set it to music; the cheer-giving songs of Frank L. Stanton, fledged with the Southland sunshine and melody ; and the verse-stories of Holman F. Day, bringing from the pines of Maine their pungent aroma of humor and pathos. Mr. Day covers an individual field, representing such phases of New England life as have been little celebrated hitherto, even by writers of fiction. He is familiar with every corner of Maine from the mountains to the sea, and writes of humanity in the concrete, sketching his types equally from the lumber camp or from the sailors and fishermen of the shore. In his latest volume they are drawn from the " Kin o' Ktaadn," and hold their way throughout its pages with a reality provoking both laughter and tears ; indeed, one must seek far to find a keener humor, or one more infectious, than that of Mr. Day, or a more sympathetic penetration into the pathos of life. The heart is the book of his reading, and, in turn, the heart is the book of his writing.

There is no attempt in these studies of the

Contents

Page

Foreword vii

I. Richard Hovey i

II

MISS LIZETTE WOODWORTH REESE is an Elizabethan, not by affectation, but by temperament. Sidney and Lovelace and Herrick and Marlowe are her contemporaries, though she moves among them as a gray-robed figure among gay cavaliers and knights, so restrained is her mood, so delicate in its withholding.

Her first collection is aptly named, A Handful of Lavender, for the fragrance of the elder time pervades it impalpably, as the scent of lavender makes sweet the linen of some treasured chest. How Miss Reese has been able, in the hurly-burly of American life, to find some indesecrate corner, some daffodiled garden-close, holding always the quiet and the glint of sunshine out of which these songs have come, is an enigma w r orth a poet's solving. She is a Southern woman, which may furnish some clew to the repose of her work. There is time down there to ripen, to let life have its own way of enrichment with one. She has been content to publish three books of verse — although the first is now incorporated with the second — in the interval in which our Northern poets would have produced a half-dozen ; nor does she much concern herself, when once the captive melodies are freed, as to their flight. She knows there are magnetic breezes in the common air, charmed winds that blow unerringly, and in whose upper currents song's wings are guided, as the carrier-doves', to their appointed goal.

There is a delicate harmony between Miss Reese's poems and their number, a nicety of adjustment between quality and quantity, that bespeaks the artist. She has the critic's gift of appraising her own work before it leaves her hand, and thus forestalls much of the criticism that might otherwise attend it. The faculty of self-analysis would be a safety-valve to the high-pressure speed at which most literature of to-day is produced — but, alas, the few that employ it ! " Open the throttle and let it drive ! " is the popular injunction to the genius within, and wherever it drives, one is expected to follow. How refreshing it is, then, to come upon work with calm upon it! — work that came out of time, culture, and artist-love, and trusts its appreciation to the same standards.

Miss Reese's verse shows constant affinity with Herrick, though it is rarely so blithe. It has the singing mood, but not the buoyant one, being tempered by something delicate and remote. The unheard melodies within it are the sweetest; it pipes to the spirit "ditties of no tone." Even its least rare fancies convev more than they say, and it must be confessed that much so-called poetry says more than it conveys. Whitman's mystical words : " All music is what awakes from you when you are reminded by the instruments," applies equally well to poetry, to poetry of suggestion, such as Miss Reese's. Yesterday's parted grace has been transmuted to poetry within us all, but it is a voiceless possession, speaking to us in the soul. Miss Reese 's poems, by a line or two, perhaps, put one in swift possession of that vanishing beauty within himself. It floods back, perchance in tears, but it is ours again. Take almost a random citation, for this quality is rarely absent from her poems, whether they summon Joy or Pain, — her lines " To A White Lilac " :

I know you, ghost of some lone, delicate hour,

Long-gone but unforgot ; Wherein I had for guerdon and for dower

That one thing I have not.

Unplucked I leave your mystical white feather,

O phantom up the lane ; For back may come that spent and lovely weather,

And I be glad again !

To analyze this, would be to pluck the mystical white feather that a poet left untouched, that it might recall the grace of " some lone, delicate hour, long-gone but unforgot ; " but the soul of such an hour has subtilized for each of us in that spiritual memory-flower, and it needs no more than the opening line of this poem to invest the disillusioned day with a mood the same — yet not the same. Miss Reese has put it in two lines in her " Song of the Lavender Woman " :

Oh, my heart, why should you break at any thoughts like

these ?

So sooth are they of the old time that they should bring you

ease.

In another brief poem, the spirit of grief, that transmutes itself at last to music, to odor, to sunsets and dawns, becomes vital again in the scent of the box, the garden shrub. The lines show Miss Reese's susceptibility to impression from the most intangible sources :

Dark, thinned, beside the wall of stone,

The box dripped in the air; Its odor through my house was blown

Into the chamber there.

Remote and yet distinct the scent,

The sole thing of the kind, As though one spoke a word half meant

That left a sting behind.

I knew not Grief would go from me

And naught of it be plain, Except how keen the box can be

After a fall of rain.

Miss Reese's art is its apparent lack of art, of conscious effort. Her diction is as simple in the mere store of words which she chooses to employ, as might be that of some poet to whom such a store was his sole equipment ; but what is that fine distinction between simplesse and simplicite ? One recognizes in her vocabulary the subtlest art of choice and elimination, art that is temperament, however, that selects by intuitive fitness and not by formulas or deliberate trying of effects. The words she employs are thrice distilled and clarified, until they become the essence of lucidity, and this essence in turn is crystallized into form in her poems. Perhaps they have, for some, too little warmth and color; they are not the richdyed words of passion, they are rather the white, delicate words of memory, but no others would serve as well.

In reading certain poems of Miss Reese's, such as " Trust," or her lines " Writ In A Book Of Elizabethan Verse," the clarity of the language recalls a passage in a letter of Jean Ingelow's in which she exclaims : " Oh that I might wash my words in light ! " The impression which many of these lyrics convey is that Miss Reese has washed her words in light, so clear, so pure is their beauty. Take, for illustration, the much-quoted lines " Love Came Back At Fall O' Dew," and note the art and feeling achieved almost wholly in monosyllabic words :

Love came back at fall o' dew,

Playing his old part ; But I had a word or two,

That would break his heart.

" He who comes at candlelight,

That should come before, Must betake him to the night

From a barred door."

This the word that made us part

In the fall o' dew ; This the word that brake his heart-—

Yet it brake mine, too !

A lyric imbued with charm, and into which a heart history is compressed, and yet employing but five or six words of more than one syllable ! Is this not clarifying to a purpose ? The lines called " Trust," illustrate with equal minuteness the gift of putting into the simplest words some truth that seems to speak itself without calling attention to language or form, and, though having less of charm, they illustrate the point in question, that of absolute simplicity without insipidity. This is not, however, to be taken as advice to all poets to cultivate the monosyllabic style. Because Miss Reese can achieve such an effect through it, when she chooses, as " Love Came Back At Fall O' Dew," does not argue that another poet would not corrupt it to nursery babble, nor would it be desirable to strive for it in any case. Song is impulse, not effort, and back of it is temperament. Miss Reese is a poet-singer; she is at her best in the pure lyric, the lyric that could be sung, and therefore her most artistic poems are such as are the least ornate, but have rare distinction in the purity, fitness, and individuality of her words.

Very few modern lyrics possess the singing quality. The term " lyric verse," as used to-day, is a misnomer. It is as intricate in form and phrase as if not consecrated to the lyre by poets in the dawn of art. The divorce between poetry and song grows more absolute year by year ; composers search almost vainly through modern volumes of verse for lyrics that combine the melody and feeling, the spontaneity and grace, indispensable to song. It is not that the modern poet is unable to produce such, but that he does not choose. It has gone out of fashion, to state the case quite frankly, to write with a singing cadence ; something rare and strange must issue from the poet's lips, something inobvious. Art lurks in surprises, and the poet of to-day must be a diviner of mysteries, a searcher of secrets, in nature and humanity and truth, and a revealer of them in his art, though he reveal ofttimes but to conceal.

Poetry grows more and more an intellectual pleasure for the cultured classes, less and less a possession of the people. Elizabethan song was upon the lips of the milkmaids and marketwomen, the common ear was trained to grace and melody ; but how many of the country folk of to-day know the involved numbers of our poets, or, knowing, could grasp them ? Who is writing the lays of the people? One can only answer that few are writing them because the spirit of poetic art has suffered' a sea-change into something rich and strange, and the poet of to-day would be fearful of his laurels should he write so artless a song as " Gather ye rosebuds while ye may," or " Come live with me and be my love," and yet these are beads that Time tells over on the rosary of Art.

The question is too broad to discuss here. We should all agree, doubtless, as to the increasing separation between poetry and song, the increasing tendency of verse to appeal to the cultured classes ; but as to the desirability of returning to the simpler form, adapting theme and melody to the common ear — how many modern poets would agree upon that? There is a middle ground, however; the reaction against the highly ornate is already felt, and a finer art may be trusted to bring its own adjustments until poetry will again become of universal appeal.

And how does this pertain to Miss Reese ? It pertains in that her ideal is the very return to clear, sympathetic song of which we have spoken. She would recapture the blitheness of Herrick, the valor of Lovelace, would lighten song's wings of their heaviness and shift Care and Wisdom to more prosaic burden-bearers. While the reminiscent mood is prevalent in her work, it is not melancholy, but has rather the iridescent glint of smiles and tears. Joy never quite departs, although " with finger at his lip, bidding adieu." Miss Reese's strife is toward a valiant cheer, whose passing she deplores in the poem called " Laughter " :

Spirit of the gust and dew, Herrick had the last of you !

Empty are the morning hills.

Herrick, he whose hearty airs Still are heard in our dull squares ;

Herrick of the daffodils !

Now the pulpit and the mart Make an unquiet thing of Art,

For we trade or else we preach ; Even the crocus, 'stead of song, Serves for text the April long ;

Thus we set it out of reach.

There is heartier food than ambrosia in this stanza. It is true that when we use the crocus for a text we set it out of reach, or, in common phrase, when poetry becomes didactic, Art flees. A dew-fresh song would teach the crocus' lesson, or many another lesson, without a hint of teaching it, merely by beauty; by the creed of Keats. Pope's didactic, sententious lines are gone ; but Keats, who never pointed a moral in his life, sings on eternally. Miss Reese too is votary to beauty for its own sake ; she gives one the flower, and he may extract the nectar for himself. The nectar is always there for one's distilling into the truth which is the essence of things. She does not herself extract and distil it, for hers is the art of suggestion.

Having this creed of song, Miss Reese's themes are not widely inclusive. They are, however, the universal themes, — love, beauty, reverence, remembrance, joy that has been tempered to cheer, having met pain by the way ; for, as we have said, no encounter with pain — and her poems give abundant evidence of such encounter — has been able to subdue the valor of her spirit, or to quench the joy at the springs of her feeling, albeit the buoyant, brimful joy has given place to acquiescent cheer.

There is a certain quality in Miss Reese's poems, a quaintness, an elder grace, that is wholly unique. It is the union of theme, phraseology, and atmosphere. The two former have been considered, but the spirit, after all, is in the last, in that which analysis cannot reach. One selects a poem from A Quiet Road illustrative of this art of correlating Then and Now, making quick the dead in memory and hope, and sets about to analyze it, — when, lo, as if one had prisoned a white butterfly, it escapes, leaving only the dust of its wing in one's hand ! Miss Reese's poems are not to be analyzed, they are to be felt ; that, too, is the creed of her song.

Is it difficult to feel these delicate lines called " The Road of Remembrance " ? —

The old wind stirs the hawthorn tree ;

The tree is blossoming ; Northward the road runs to the sea,

And past the House of Spring.

The folk go down it unafraid ;

The still roofs rise before ; When you were lad and I was maid,

Wide open stood that door.

Now, other children crowd the stair, And hunt from room to room ;

Outside, under the hawthorn fair, We pluck the thorny bloom.

Out in the quiet road we stand,

Shut in from wharf and mart, The old wind blowing up the land,

The old thoughts at our heart.

Miss Reese's growth, as shown in her two volumes, is so marked that while A Handful of Lavender has the foreshadowing of her later work, and also some notably fine poems, — such as " That Day You Came," " The Last Cricket," " A Spinning Song," and " The Old Path," — it has not the same perfectly individual note that pervades A Quiet Road. The personal mark, the artist-proof mark, upon nearly everything in the later collection, is frequently absent from the first. That part of A Hand/til of Lavender first issued as A Branch of May is naturally the least finished of Miss Reese's work. It is unsure and yet indicative of that —

Oncoming hour of light and dew, Of heartier sun, more certain blue,

which shines in her later work.

" The Death Potion," from the first collection, is a case in point : it is strong in idea, and here and there in execution, but its metre is faulty, and it departs so often from the initial measure that one who has set himself in tune with that is thrown from the key, and in adapting himself to the changed rhythm loses the pleasure of the poem.

It must be said, however, that such lack of metrical sensitiveness is very rare even in the earlier poems. In general, they are of unimpeachable rhythm ; indeed, the singing note is so much Miss Reese's natural expression that it creeps into this sonnet, " The Old Path," and turns it in effect to a lyric :

O Love ! O Love ! this way has hints of you In every bough that stirs, in every bee,

Yellow and glad, droning the thick grass through, In blooms red on the bush, white on the tree \

And when the wind, just now, came soft and fleet, Scattering the blackberry blossoms, and from some

Fast darkening space that thrush sang sudden sweet, You were so near, so near, yet did not come ! Say, is it thus with you, O friend, this day ?

Have you, for me that love you, thought or word ? Do I, with bud or bough, pass by your way ;

With any breath of brier or note of bird ?

If this I knew, though you be quick or dead, All my sad life would I go comforted.

A Handful of Lavender shows the tendency of most young poets to affect the sonnet, a tendency laudable enough if one be a natural sonneteer. Miss Reese has many finely conceived and well-executed sonnets, but few that are unforgettably fine, as are many of her lyrics. That she recognizes wherein her surest power lies is obvious from the fact that, whereas A Handful of Lavender contains some thirty-two sonnets, A Quiet Road contains but twelve. Those of nature predominated in the former, nature for its own sake ; but in the latter there is far less accent upon nature and more upon life.

They show in technique, also, Miss Reese's firmer, surer touch and greater clarity. There are certain sonnets in A Handful of Lavender, such as " A Song of Separation," and " Renunciation," warmer in feeling than the later ones and equal to them in manner ; but in general the mechanism is much more apparent — one does occasionally see the wires, which is never the case in the later work.

" The Look of the Hedge," or these lines called " Recompense," will illustrate the ease and lucidity of her sonnets in A Quiet Road:

Sometimes, yea, often, I forget, forget ;

Pass your closed door with not a thought of you,

Of the old days, but only of these new ; I sow j I reap ; my house in order set.

Then of a sudden doth this thing befall, By a wood's edge, or in the market-place, That I remember naught but your ttefarr' face,

And other folk forgotten, you are all. When this is so, oh, sooth the time and sweet !

And I, thereafter, am like unto one

Who from the lilac bloom and the young year Comes to a chamber shuttered from the street,

Yet heeds nor emptiness nor lack of sun, For that the recompensing Spring is near !

There are excellently wrought sonnets in the first volume, indeed, the majority of them are not without fine lines or true feeling, but the gain in command of the form has been marked. When all is said, however, one comes back to A Quiet Road for the songs it holds, and for these he treasures it. Miss Reese has epitomized, in her lines " Writ In A Book Of

Elizabethan Verse," her own characteristics under those of the earlier singers, sounded the delicate notes of her own reed, when she says :

Mine is the crocus and the call Of gust to gust in shrubberies tall ;

The white tumult, the rainy hush ;

And mine the unforgetting thrush That pours its heart-break from the wall.

For I am tears, for I am Spring, The old and immemorial thing ;

To me come ghosts by twos and threes,

Under the swaying cherry-trees, From east and west remembering.

O elder Hour, when I am not,

Gone out like smoke from road and plot,

More perfect Hour of light and dew,

Shall lovers turn away from you, And long for me, the Unforgot !

Surely they will, for clear, pure song keeps its vibrancy, and the note to which is set the quaintness of such words as these in Miss Reese's poem " A Pastoral," will not easily be forgotten :

Oho, my love, oho, my love, and ho, the bough that shows, Against the grayness of mid-Lent, the color of the rose ! The lights o' Spring are in the sky and down among the

grass ; Bend low, bend low, ye Kentish reeds, and let two lovers

pass !

The plum-tree is a straitened thing; the cherry is but vain; The thorn but black and empty at the turning of the lane ; Yet mile by mile out in the wind the peach-trees blow and

blow, And which is stem and which is bloom, not any maid can

know.

The ghostly ships sail up to town and past the orchard wall; There is a leaping in the reeds ; they waver and they fall ; For lo, the gusts of God are out ; the April time is brief; The country is a pale red rose, and dropping leaf by leaf.

I do but keep me close beside and hold my lover's hand ; Along the narrow track we pass across the level land ; The petals whirl about us and the sedge is to our knees ; The ghostly ships sail up, sail up, beyond the stripping trees.

When we are old, when we are cold, and barred is the door, The memory of this will come and turn us young once

more ; The lights o' Spring will dim the grass and tremble from the

sky; And all the Kentish reeds bend low to let us two go by !

Miss Reese's work in A Quiet Road is so uniformly quotable that one distrusts his judgment in the matter of choice, and having cited one poem as representative comes suddenly upon another that might have served him better; such an one, perhaps, is that to Robert Louis Stevenson, in its penetrative feeling, showing Miss Reese to be a diviner of spirits. One need hardly be told that she is of the " mystic fellowcraft " of Stevenson, and although the very name of the valorous one has become a sort of fetich among his lovers everywhere, one would go far to find him set forth more bravely than in this characterization, of which a part must suffice to show the quality:

In his old gusty garden of the North, He heard lark-time the uplifting Voices call ; Smitten through with Voices was the evenfall —

At last they drove him forth.

Now there were two rang silverly and long ; And of Romance, that spirit of the sun, And of Romance, spirit of youth, was one ;

And one was that of Song.

Gold-belted sailors, bristling buccaneers, The flashing soldier, and the high, slim dame, These were the Shapes that all around him came,-

That we let go with tears.

His was the unstinted English of the Scot, Clear, nimble, with the scriptural tang of Knox Thrust through it like the far, strict scent of box,

To keep it unforgot.

No frugal Realist, but quick to laugh, To see appealing things in all he knew, He plucked the sun-sweet corn his fathers grew,

And would have naught of chaff.

David and Keats and all good singing men, Take to your hearts this Covenanter's son, Gone in mid-years, leaving our years undone —

Where you do sing again !

There ! I have repented me and quoted it all, to preserve the unity.

To be rare and quaint without being fantastic, to have swift-conceiving fancy that turns into poetry the near-by thing that many overlook — this is Miss Reese's gift. You shall not go to her for ethics, philosophy, nor for instruction of any kind, for that is contrary to her creed ; but you shall go to her for truth, truth that has become personal through experience; go to her for beauty, uplift, and refreshment, and above all for the recovery of the departed mood.

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…