The Lord's coming, Israel, and the church

Front matter

THE UNIVERSITY

OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY

Diocese of Springfield Protestant Episcopal Church

Chapter IX

god’s PROVISION FOR THE FAITHFUL .

THE LORD’S COMING, ISRAEL, AND THE CHURCH.

INTEODUCTION.

Everybody is aware of the difference prevailing among the Lord’s people as to the interpretation of those passages of Scripture which foretell the future in reserve for the Church and the world.

The ordinary interpretation is, that the promises contained in the Psalms and Old Testament prophecies refer to the Church, which, as the spiritual Israel, has taken the place, in Cod’s purposes, of the literal Israel, to whom these promises were given. So, the fulfilment of the promises is taken to be spiritual rather than literal, being brought about by the gradual spread of Christianity, and the blessings of peace and prosperity following the universal triumph of the gospel. This world-wide dominion of truth and happiness is presumed to be the period of a thousand years, during which Satan is bound, and the saints reign with Christ. It is supposed that at the close

A

THE LORHS COMING.

of this time, after another brief outbreak of Satan’s craft and human wickedness, the world is destroyed ; and that there is then a general resurrection of the dead, both bad and good, to be judged before the great white throne. This is interpreted as the event called ‘‘the coming of the Lord,” “the appearing of the Lord,” “the day of the Lord,” “the end of the age ” (mis-translated “ world ”), and “ the coming of the Son of man ” — names supposed all to refer to the same period, the closing up of the history, and indeed, of the existence, of the habitable globe.

There is, however, another interpretation given to the Scriptures describing these events, which may be briefly stated as follows. The Old Testament prophecies, except where manifestly figurative, are to receive a literal fulfilment. The promises given to Israel are to be made good to Israel, not to the Church, The Old Testament prophecies being thus taken from the Church, the New Testament is found to contain no predictions of the universal spread of Christianity, but, on the contrary, sad forecasts of corruption, leading to judgment, in the body professing the name of Christ. In the midst of this gloom, however, the prospect of the Lord’s coming for His saints, shines as a bright hope for the hearts of the faithful. This coming, the date of which is purposely left undetermined, instead of being at the end of the world, is preliminary to the judgments awaiting the world, and to the reign of Christ with His saints. When it occurs, the living saints will be caught up to meet

INTRODUCTION.

the Lord in the air, and at the same time will take place, in part at least, the first resurrection/’ when the dead in Christ will be raised. Then follow the woes which usher in ‘‘ the day of the Lord,” when Israel is restored. Old Testament prophecy fulhlled, Satan bound, and the dominion of Christ established on the earth. At its close Satan is loosed, the nations rebel, the world is consumed, and “the rest of the dead ” are judged.

I propose to inquire which of these interpretations is correct. The question is not one of mere curiosity, still less an intrusion into regions we are forbidden to tread. The distinction which our Lord draws between the servant and the friend is that “the servant knoweth not what his Lord doeth,” while He told His disciples, as friends, all things that He had heard of His Father (John xv. 15). In the same discourse He promises to send “ the Spirit of truth,” the Comforter, to show them “things to come” (John xvi. 13). Indeed, the very thought that the constant references to the future scattered through the sacred writings are not meant to be understood, carries its own refutation. And, as. if foreseeing the spirit of unbelief and indifference which characterises the present time, the Holy Ghost has, in the introduction to the Apocalypse, the most distinctively prophetic portion of the New Testament, pronounced a special blessing on those “that hear the words of this prophecy and keep those things which are written therein ” (Rev. i. 3).

THE LORHS COMING.

While, moreover, it is admitted that the interpretation of prophecy may be attempted in a frivolously inquisitive spirit, are not those who turn a deaf ear to its promises and warnings themselves guilty of the same irreverence which they censure in others ? For the object of prophecy is to unfold God’s purposes with respect to the glory of His Son, whom man has refused, but whom God has exalted, and to whom every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess. In the contemplation of this theme, He invites His chosen ones to share. And who are those chosen ones ? Are they mere lookers on ? No, thanks be to God, we who believe in Jesus are His fellow-heirs — all things are ours. God invites us to look at the inheritance He has Himself prepared for us in joint possession with the Son of His love. And surely, as in the enjoyment of that inheritance, the first-born,’^ in whom we have our acceptance, will be the one object of our worship and delight, so in its contemplation now, our brightest thought should be that we are gazing on the portion prepared for Him who alone is worthy to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing.” To study prophecy with any more trivial object is to lose sight of this glorious end. It is like studying the movements of the solar system from the orbits of the moro distant planets, without taking account of the central globe round which the whole revolves. But, on the other hand, to neglect it as unprofitable, because it does not contribute to our personal salvation.

, INTRODUCTION, is a piece of selfishness derogatory to the claims of Christ, and unworthy of the condescending goodness of God in thus taking us into His own counsels. It is a deliberate preference of the position of a servant to that of a friend, a declaration that so long as our own interests are secured, we are indifferent as to what God has told us concerning the glories of Him who loved us and gave Himself for us.

Nor can we overlook the great practical importance of the inquiry. For surely there is a vast moral chasm between the two interpretations of coming events just indicated. If Gods Word teaches that Christianity, instead of overspreading the world, will only prove, like Judaism, the incurable enmity of man to God, the jubilant and self-congratulatory tone prevalent in Christendom, is nothing better than Laodicean self-complacency, saying, ‘‘ I am rich and Increased with goods, and have need of nothing,'’ while really it should be mourning that it is wretched and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked ” (Rev. iii. 17). It is holding out a false and delusive hope, saying, ‘‘ peace and safety,” when “ sudden destruction ” is approaching. And if the world is hurrying on to judgment, Christians who see it will duly estimate the seductive cry of modern progress, and beware of entangling themselves in affairs over which such a doom is hanging.

While, therefore, the deep solemnity of the subject forbids all idle curiosity, its importance equally condemns all selfish indifference. These things are

THE LORHS COMING.

written for our instruction, and it cannot be a matter of little moment whether the instruction which God has given is received or slighted, understood or misapprehended. Eeverence for God’s Holy Word, regard for the honour and glory of Christ, as well as the immense practical questions involved in the different schemes of interpretation, all unite in rebuking both the curious spirit in which the subject is too often approached, and the careless spirit in which it is too often avoided.

For the sake of clearness the best mode of looking at the subject will be to inquire —

First, What is the immediate prospect placed before the believer ? in other words. What is the hope of the Church, according to the Word of God ? This will naturally lead us to look,

Secondly, At the promises of blessing and righteousness upon earth contained in the Old Testament Scriptures, and the mode in which these promises are to receive their fulfilment. Having thus distinguished between the hope of the Church and the prospect of blessing before the world, we shall be in a better position to ascertain and understand.

Thirdly, The teaching of the Holy Ghost concerning the position held by the Church in God’s dispensational dealings, and the moral relationship in which . it stands towards the world, a matter involving the deepest and most practical lessons as to the walk suited to believers in the present age.

Chapter 1

DIRECT TEACHING CONCERNING THE LORD’s RETURN FOR LIVING BELIEVERS.

The point of most immediate interest to the believer is the meaning to be attached to the phrase, ‘‘ The Coming of the Lord.^’ Does Scripture in these words speak of the Christian’s death, or of Christ’s coming to raise and judge the dead at the end of the world ? Or do the words hold out a hope of a totally different nature ? I propose, in this first part, to examine what the Word of God says about the coming of the Lord, first as it affects the living saint, and next as it affects the dead.

The Old Testament Scriptures are full of the coming of the Messiah in glory and power. Indeed the Jews were so occupied with these prophecies that they overlooked those which foretold His coming in weakness and humiliation. His coming in power is often spoken of by Jesus Himself and by His disciples in their converse with one another. They ask, “ What shall be the sign of Thy coming ” (Matt. xxiv. 3) ; are told to watch, ‘‘ for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come” (ver. 42) ; and admonished by the question — “When the Son of man cometh, shall He

THE LORHS COMING.

find faith on the earth ” (Luke xviii. 8) ? Christ’s second coming was, therefore, expected by the disciples, and held a considerable place in His own teaching.

But in the epistles there appears another fact, a “ mystery ” hidden from the Old Testament prophets, and only hinted at by Jesus Himself. This is that the Lord’s coming is divided into two different acts. The prophets only foretell the coming of the Messiah Himself. But the New Testament shows that in this glorious advent He will be accompanied by His saints. In order for this, however, it is necessary that before Jesus comes to reign over the earth. His saints should have been taken up to heaven. Accordingly the epistles make known that the first act in the Lord’s coming will be to take believers to be with Himself, and the second His return with them to the world. When our Lord was on earth the time for revealing this mystery had not arrived, so that He usually speaks of His coming in general terms, without distinguishing its two different parts. Hence it is only from the epistles that we can fully understand His teaching on this subject, though when seen in their light, its Divine perfection becomes obvious.

In the first three gospels especially, the two parts, though both alluded to, are so blended, that it will be desirable to postpone the examination of their teaching until we have discovered the key by which its liidden treasures are unlocked. In the fourth gospel.

DIRECT TEACHING.

II however, though the mystery is not distinctly revealed, the return of the Lord for His saints is held out as a hope before the 'hearts of the disciples. On the night of His betrayal, Jesus says, Let not your heart be troubled; ye believe in God, believe also in Me. In My Father’s house are many mansions ; if it were not so I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you ; and if I go and prepare a place for you, I will corae again and receive you unto Myself; that where I am, there ye may be also ” (John xiv. 1-3). These words were spoken to comfort His disciples on His departure. He tells them that while absent He will prepare a place for them ; and will presently return to take them to be with Himself.

This passage is often applied to the death of believers. Such an interpretation, however, is unwarranted by other scriptures, and is open to serious objection. The disciples knew, not only of a resurrection, but of the separate existence of the spirit, whether in happiness, like Lazarus, or in torment, like the rich man. If, therefore, Jesus was only telling them that after death their spirits would be with Him in paradise. He merely told them what they knew. Concerning death, moreover, it is said that the believer goes to be with Jesus, never that Jesus comes for the believer. Nor would the hope given to the disciples, at such a crisis, be that of entering into any imperfect state, such as the existence of the spirit even in paradise. The passage implies completeness, that perfect reunion which only takes place

THE LORHS COMING.

“ when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality.” Death is not the believer’s hope, but the redemption of the body. ‘‘ If our earthly house of this tabernacle be dissolved,” still the hope is the house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.” Paul is willing, no doubt, ‘‘to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord,” but his desire is, “ not that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life ” (2 Cor. v. 1-9). This, the perfect state, is the true Christian hope, and surely in the parting words of comfort to His disciples, when promising to come again and take them to Himself, nothing short of the fulfilment of this hope can have been in the Lord’s mind.

That these words disclose a new prospect, not the spirit’s presence with Jesus after death, is clear from the closing verses of this gospel. There our Lord first foretells Peter’s death; then, being asked what should become of John, replies — “ If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee ? ” (John xxi. 22). Now this could not mean that John might live till the end of the world. But neither could it mean that John might go to be with Jesus at his death. In this case, how would he have dificred from Peter or any of the other disciples ? Moreover, this interpretation would rob the words of all meaning, making them equivalent to this — “ If I will that he lives till he dies, what is that to thee ? ” The coming referred to, therefore, is

DIRECT TEACHING.

neither the departure to be with Jesus at death, nor His appearing at the end of the world.

Its true character is not far to seek. It is here spoken of, not as one of an indefinite number of similar events, like the deaths of individual believers, but as a single transaction, of which the disciples had already heard. Such a transaction Jesus had but lately named, when He promised to come again for His disciples. It is true He did not distinguish it from the other part of His coming, but He brought it out as a special feature, and it was to this feature that John’s heart would turn when he heard the words uttered. What can be simpler ? On a solemn occasion Jesus tells His disciples that He will come to take them to Himself. Shortly afterwards He bids them not to be surprised if one of them tarries till He comes. However little the disciples might yet be able to distinguish between the two parts of His coming, there can surely be no doubt that these utterances were meant to bring before their minds the same blessed hope.

These two passages, then, teach us : First, the return of Jesus for His saints, not at death or the end of the world, but at some definite though unrevealed period, when all shall be brought together to the place He has gone to prepare for them ; and secondly, that this coming again, though uncertain as to time, might occur before the death of one, at least, of the apostles. So the disciples understood it, for there “ went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple

THE LORHS COMING.

should not die’’ (John xxi. 23), and though the Holy Ghost corrects this error, we are never told that it consisted in believing that Jesus might come in John’s lifetime ; still less in believing that if He did come, John would not die. Christ’s own words expressly authorised the former belief; and other parts of Scripture make it clear that Christians living at the Lord’s coming will be translated without seeing death. The disciples’ error, therefore, did not consist in this understanding of the words of Jesus ; but in adding to those words, and converting a statement that John might tarry into a prediction that he would tarry.

Nor is anything' said about unusual longevity on the part of John. The time of the Lord’s coming is studiously kept out of sight. The only event that must necessarily happen, according to these scriptures, before the promised return of Jesus for His disciples, was the martyrdom of Peter, a thing which, in an age of persecution, might have occurred at almost any hour. When that had taken place, there was no reason to be deduced from^ these passages why the return of Jesus should not be momentarily expected.

Let us look at the position of the early disciples, remembering that this was almost all the light they yet had on the subject. Of the two whose future career had been spoken of, one had been told that he must suffer death, the other that he might tarry till Jesus came. Would it not be a perfectly natural and lawful thing for John to be living in anticipation of the Lord’s coming ? Would it not, indeed, have

DIRECT TEACHING.

shown sad unbelief if he had not looked for translation, but had looked for death instead of translation ? Would it not also have been lawful for the other disciples, Peter excepted, to anticipate that the Lord might come in their lifetime, and to have constantly before their souls the refreshing hope that the One whom they loved, and who had departed from them, would soon return to take them to Himself ?

It is important to ascertain the legitimate effect which these words of our Lord would have on the minds of the disciples, because they were the only clear light on this subject which they yet possessed. It is true there were other prophecies as to His coming uttered by Himself, but these were intentionally obscure as to the great point here brought out, namely, the coming of the Lord for His saints apart from and before His coming in power and glory. In no other place had the Lord Jesus held out the hope of His return for His disciples, without reference to other events affecting His coming to the world. The hope, therefore, was clearly expressed, in very few words, and little capable of erroneous interpretations. It is a serious thing to maintain that a hope so clearly and definitely stated is a mistake ; that the conclusion legitimately flowing from our Lord’s own words was a conclusion which He did not mean His disciples to draw ; that the hope reasonably founded on His own promise was a hope which He did not mean them to cherish. Eather, surely, should we infer that, though in His wisdom God has seen fit to conceal the time, i6

THE LORD'S COMING.

and though in His mercy He has seen fit to delay that event, which, however blessed for believers, puts a period to the grace in which He is now acting towards the world, yet His purpose was to hold out this coming of His Son as a precious perennial hope for the souls of those who are His.

But though our Lord’s own language seems sufiiciently plain, it may be asked, whether it is in agreement with other portions of God’s Word ? Christ s teaching, as we have said, only slightly touched this special subject of His separate advent for His saints ; and He left its full significance to be brought to the hearts of His disciples by that Spirit of truth, who was to ‘Heach them all things, and bring all things to their remembrance whatsoever He had said unto them.” What, then, does this Holy Spirit teach us concerning the wondrous theme we are here considering ?

The question is not treated at length in the Acts, which, however, contains a passage clearly announcing the Lord’s return, in some form or other, before the end of the world. Immediately after His ascension, while the disciples still ‘‘ looked steadfastly toward heaven, as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, which also said. Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven ? This same Jesus which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen Him go into heaven ” (Acts i. 10, 11). Now no time is here mentioned, and if the passage stood by itself,

IT

it might be supposed to refer to the end of the world. But, comparing it with other passages, this interpretation becomes impossible. For, in the first place. His comino^ ao:ain was to be in like manner ” with His ascension, and nothing can be conceived more unlike to this event than the appearance of the Judge upon the great white throne. Secondly, when the Judge then appears, He does not come to the world, for “the earth and the heaven flee away.” It is the dead who are summoned before the Judge, not the Judge who comes to them. (Rev. xx. 11-15.) But, thirdly, our Lord had Himself constantly spoken of His coming, and had only recently named its effect upon the disciples as a special ground of consolation and hope, as the one precious comfort to stay their hearts during His absence. What, then, is more natural than that now, when He had just departed from His last earthly communion with them, the promise of His coming should once more be presented to their hearts ? True, the two parts of the coming were not yet 'clearly made known, nor was the special hope of His return for His saints, as distinct from the other act, here revealed. Still the coming, of which this feature was now taught, is presented as a general hope, to cheer and calm the souls of the disciples.

But it is in the epistles, where the Spirit has fully unfolded “ all that Jesus bef^an both to do and teach” while here on earth, that this “ mystery ” of the separate coming for the saints, hitherto hid in the counsels of God, is first distinctly revealed. The

B i8 earliest of these epistles, as nearly all competent critics are agreed, is the first of those addressed to the Thessalonians. Paul had spent at the outside three or four weeks in Thessalonica (Acts xvii. 2), and the whole of the instruction possessed by the believers was derived from him during this brief visit, Avhich was followed shortly by his first epistle. It is interesting, therefore, to observe the truth they had received, and to note its practical effect. On both these points the Holy Ghost has given full information. The apostle rejoices in their “ work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ.” They “were ensamples to all that believe.” Not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place, people were relating how these Thessalonian converts had “ turned to God from idols, to serve the living and true God, md to wait for His Son from heaven'’ (1 Thess. i. 9, 10). These, then, were the two characteristics of the Thessalonian Church. Can it be said that they are the distinguishing marks of Christians at the present day ? It may be answered that all believers expect Jesus to come from heaven, and this is, no doubt, true. But surely no j)erson, looking at modern Christians, would seize upon this as a leading feature of their faith. The expression appears to imply, what the rest of the epistle plainly shows, that there was among these Thessalonians something much more than a distant expectation of the Lord’s coming at the end of the world ; that it was a present hope, influencing all

DIRECT TEACHING.

^9 their thoughts, their feelings, and their practical life, a hope so vivid and powerful as to attract the attention of '' all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia.”

If, then, this was a delusion arising from imperfect knowledge, how is it that the apostle, instead of putting them right, records this waiting attitude, side by side with their turning to God, as a portion of the bright testimony they were bearing ? In the next chapter he again incidentally alludes to the hope, and again without the smallest hint that the Thessalonians had fallen into error, or were cherishing unfounded expectations. In the fourth chapter, to which we shall presently have occasion more fully to refer, the apostle alludes to the Lord’s coming in these remarkable terms — “For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep;” and later, “then we, which are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds ” (1 Thess. iv. 15-17). Jesus had told His disciples, that one of them might tarry till His return. Here the Holy Ghost intimates that believers then living might also remain to that time. He contrasts the “ tue which are alive ” with "Hhem which are asleep.” What is the significance of the word “ we ” used in this manner ? A speaker might say to his audience — “ We who live to the end of this century.” It would not mean that any of them must live till then, merely that they might. But it would be senseless to say — “ We who live to the end of the

THE LORD'S COMING.

next century.” So, here, the Holy Ghost is not revealing the time of Christ's return, but, while leaving this indefinite, is urging the hope which God would have believers cherish. If He did not mean them to be looking for the Lord’s coming during their own lifetime, the use of the first person would be not only .meaningless but erroneous.

Compare this language with our Lord’s own words. Jesus says — “I will come again Paul says — '‘The Lord Himself shall descend from heaven.” Jesus says — "I will receive you unto Myself;” Paul says that the believer still living " shall be caught up to meet the Lord in the air.” Jesus gives as His motive, " That where I am there ye may be also ; ” Paul declares — “ So shall we ever be with the Lord.” Jesus gives His promise that the hearts of the disciples might not be troubled ; Paul exhorts sorrowing believers to " comfort one another with these words.” There can surely be no question that these passages, running so closely parallel, relate to the same event. And what is the event ? Not the end of the world, for it might happen in the lifetime of the generation then on the earth. Not death, for the living were to be caught up without seeing death. It can be nothing else, then, but the coming of the Lord for His own, according to the gracious promise He had, before His departure, given the disciples.

Very similar, and in some respects even stronger, is the language used by the same apostle in addressing the Corinthian Church. " Behold,” he says, " I

DIRECT TEACHING.

show you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we SHALL all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump; for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed ” (1 Cor. xv. 51, 52). Here, then, we are expressly told, what in the other passage we might confidently infer, that those living at the Lord’s coming for His saints shall not die, but shall be changed. But is not this coming at the end of the world ? Let us look closely at the text. There is no mention here made of the resurrection of unbelievers. The two classes put in contrast are, therefore, believers who will be living at ‘this advent, and believers who are dead. Now, in which of these classes does the apostle range himself and those to whom he was writing? Not with the dead, but with the living. Had he meant that both he and they would be in their graves, he would have said — “ The trumpet shall sound, and we shall be raised incorruptible, and the living shall be changed.” So modern theology puts it. The Holy Ghost inverts it, classing the present generation as thase who might live to the Lord’s coming. If it be said; that the Spirit, who searcheth ‘‘ the deep things of God,” must have known that the Thessalonians would die before the Lord’s return, and cannot, therefore, have meant them to look out for it as a present hope, the answer is, that Christ himself did so place it before John; though, of course. He knew that it would not happen till after John’s death. “The foolishness of God is