Read here

A Catechism on the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England

James Beaven · 1853

24,878 words · about 1 h 45 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Licence: PD · Wikisource licence template(s) on the work: {{pd-old}}. Text and transcription from en Wikisource by Wikisource contributors (transcription licensed CC BY-SA 4.0; contributors: https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=A_Catechism_on_the_Thirty-nine_Articles_of_the_Church_of_England&action=history). · Wikisource contributors

Text from Wikisource and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
James Beaven
Language
English
Published
1853
Length
24,878 words · about 1 h 45 min
Sections
8 reader sections
Text
Digital text
Rights
Public domain

 

Contents (8)
  1. Front matter about 1 min
  2. Introduction about 2 min
  3. Part I about 11 min
  4. Part II about 10 min
  5. Part III about 17 min
  6. Part IV about 36 min
  7. Part V about 8 min
  8. Appendix about 20 min

Continue:

Front matter

A CATECHISM

ON

THE THIRTY-NINE ARTICLES

Introduction

A CATECHISM

on

THE THIRTY-NINE ARTICLES.

INTRODUCTION.

For what purpose were the Articles of Religion drawn up?

"For the avoiding of diversities of opinion, and for establishing of consent touching true religion."

Express this in other words.

They were made in order to avoid, or do away with, differences of opinion in religion, and to cause persons to agree in holding the truth.

How is this done in these Articles?

Partly by laying down the truth we are to hold fast, and partly by pointing out the errors we are to avoid.

By whom were these Articles first agreed upon?

By the archbishops and bishops of both provinces in England, and by the whole clergy.

What do you mean by "both provinces?"

England is divided, for purposes connected with the Church, into two provinces, that of Canterbury and that of York; of which the archbishops of Canterbury and York are the governors.

What is an archbishop?

A bishop who is placed over other bishops.

Where and when did the archbishops, bishops, and clergy agree to these Articles?

"In the convocation holden at London in the year 1562."

What is a convocation?

A synod or meeting of the bishops and clergy of the provinces.

How could the whole clergy meet together to agree to these Articles?

The clergy of each diocese met together beforehand, and sent deputies to speak for them at the convocation.

What do you mean by a diocese?

A portion of country under the government of one bishop.

Were the articles originally published only by the authority of the bishops and clergy?

No: they were also assented to by Elizabeth, the queen of England at the time, and published by her authority.

What further authority have they since received as regards the Church of England?

An act of parliament requires the clergy of that Church to subscribe them.

By what authority were the Articles, as contained in the Prayer-Book, set forth in America?

They were "established by the bishops, clergy, and laity of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, in convention."

When was this done?

On the twelfth day of September, in the year of our Lord 1801.

Are the laity required to subscribe to the thirty-nine Articles?

The Church does not make any such demand upon her lay members.

How many Articles are there?

Thirty-nine.

Into what parts may you conveniently divide them?

Into five parts.

Give the subjects of the five parts.

1. On the doctrine concerning God.

2. On the rule of faith.

3. On the spiritual condition of man.

4. On the Church and its ordinances.

5. On the civil duties of members of the Church.

Part I

PART I.

What is the subject of the first part?

On the doctrine concerning God.

What Articles does it comprise?

The first five.

Article I.

What is the subject of the first Article?

"Faith in the Holy Trinity."

What is the meaning of the word Trinity?

Threefoldness, or subsistence in Three Persons.

What do you mean by "the Holy Trinity?"

The Three Persons in One God.

What does this Article teach concerning the one God?

"There is but one living and true God, everlasting, without body, parts, or passions; of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness; the Maker, and Preserver of all things both visible and invisible. And in unity of this Godhead there be Three Persons, of one substance, power, and eternity; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost."

Do we know the certainty that there is but one living and true God from natural reason or from revelation?

From revelation.

But may we not ascertain it by reason?

We may find strong reason for believing it, but we do not absolutely know it.

Prove it from Scripture.

Deut. iv. 39; Isa. xlv. 18; Jer. x. 10, first part.

What further proof is there?

The whole history of the Israelitish nation until the time of Christ was intended by Almighty God to impress it upon men's minds.

Why was so much labour requisite to establish it?

Because the ignorance and sinfulness of men led them to make gods of inferior beings.

What is meant when you say that God is "everlasting?"

That He never had a beginning and will never have an end.

Prove this from Scripture.

Ps. xc. 2; Isa. xli. 4.

What ground of natural reason is there for concluding that God is "without body?"

If He had a body, He must be limited and confined in space, and consequently could not be present and acting every where at the same time.

Show that it is taught in Scripture that God is without body.

We are told in St. John iv. 24, that "God is a spirit," and in St. Luke xxiv. 39, that "a spirit hath not flesh and bones."

What do you mean when you say that He is "without parts?"

That He cannot be divided into different portions.

How does this appear to be true?

It follows from His having no body.

How does this agree with those passages of Holy Scripture in which the eye, the arm, the feet, &c, of God, are spoken of?

This is only a figurative manner of speaking, employed to convey certain ideas more perfectly to our minds.

What do you mean by saying that He is "without passions?"

That He cannot be wrought upon or changed by any other being.

How does that appear?

Because He could not be the sovereign Ruler and Director of all things, if He were liable to be wrought upon or changed by any thing else.

Show from Scripture that God is unchangeable.

St. James i. 17. "With Him is no variableness, neither shadow of turning."

Why then is God spoken of as being angry or grieved, &c.?

Because the truth could not have been in any degree made known to us, except by language drawn from our own manner of feeling and acting.

Prove from Scripture that God is of infinite power.

St. Matt. xix. 26. "With God all things are possible."

Prove that He is of infinite wisdom.

Ps. cxlvii. 5.

Prove that His goodness is infinite.

St. Luke xviii. 19. "None is good, save One, that is, God:" that is, the goodness of God is perfect, whilst that of all other beings is imperfect.

In what sense is God the Maker of all things?

He made all things out of nothing.

Prove this.

Rom. xi. 36; Acts xiv. 15; Heb. xi. 3. "All things are of Him, the heaven, the earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein;" and "the things which are were not made of things that do appear."

Prove that He preserves all things.

Ps. xxxvi. 6; Job xii. 10. "He preserveth both man and beast;" and "in His hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind."

What do you mean by "the unity of the Godhead?"

The oneness of the nature of God.

What statement is made on this article concerning the Holy Trinity?

"In unity of this Godhead there be Three Persons, of one substance, power, and eternity; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost."

What is meant by saying that the Three Persons are in the unity of this Godhead? That they are therefore one God, or that they are united in this Divine nature.

In what respect are they one?

They are "of one substance, power, and eternity."

Mention some passages of Scripture in which the Holy Trinity is spoken of.

Isa. vi. 3; St. Matt, xxviii. 19; 2 Cor. xiii. 14.

Show that the Persons of the Holy Trinity are of one substance.

In the Institution of Holy Baptism divine honour is equally paid to all; and St. Paul (2 Cor. xiii.) prays for divine blessings equally from all: and if they are thus equal in honour, they must be equal in substance or essential nature.

Show that they are of one power and eternity.

St. Paul prays for divine blessings from all equally, and that "for evermore:" now if they can equally impart spiritual blessings, and that for evermore, they must be of one power and eternity.

Article II.

What is the subject of the second Article?

"The Word or Son of God, which was made very man."

What is the meaning of "very man?"

Real man.

Prove that the Son of God and the Word of God are the same. Compare St. John i. 3, with Heb. i. 2, by which it appears that the Word and the Son equally made the world.

Prove that He was "begotten from everlasting of the Father."

St. John i. 1; Col. i. 15-17; Micah v. 2.

He was "in the beginning with God," "before all things that were created:" and "His goings forth have been of old, from everlasting."

What do you mean by saying that He is "very God?"

That He is God in the fullest sense.

Prove it from Scripture.

Col. i. 16, 17; Heb. i. 3; Rev. xxii. 13. He is "before all things, and by Him all things consist; all things were created by Him and for Him;" "He upholdeth all things by the word of His power;" He is "the beginning and the ending, the first and the last."

Prove that He is "eternal God."

Rev. i. 17, 18; xxii. 13.

Prove that He is "of one substance with the Father."

It would follow from His being the Son.

Prove it from Holy Scripture.

Col. i. 15; Heb. i. 3; St. John x. 30; xiv. 9-11.

He is "the image of the invisible God," "the brightness of His glory, and the express image of His person;" he that hath seen Him hath seen the Father; He and the Father are one.

Prove that the Word or Son of God took man's nature.

St. John i. 14; Phil. ii. 6-8.

Prove that He did this "in the womb of the Virgin Mary and of her substance."

St. Luke i. 31, 32; Gal. iv. 4.

Prove that the Word of God, when made man, had the whole and perfect nature of God.

Col. ii. 9. "In Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead."

Prove that He had likewise the whole and perfect nature of man.

Heb. ii. 16, 17. "In all things it behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren."

Prove that "the Godhead and manhood were joined in one Person."

Phil. ii. 6, 7; Col. i. 14, 17; Heb. i. 8, 9. It is the same Person, who "was in the form of God and thought it not robbery to be equal with God," that "was made in the likeness of man and became obedient unto death:" the same "by whom all things consist," and in whose "blood we have redemption;" the same "whose throne is for ever and ever, and who hath God for His God."

Prove that this Person is never to be divided.

Rev. i. 17, 18. "He liveth and was dead, and is alive for evermore."

Prove that, thus united, the two natures make one Christ.

Rom. ix. 5. Of the Israelites "as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed forever."

"Why is it stated that He truly suffered, &c.?

Because some taught that He suffered only in appearance.

How do we know that they were deceivers?

Because we have the testimony of eye-witnesses to the reality of His sufferings, &c.

Who are they?

All the Apostles, (Acts ii. 14, 23,) and particularly St. Matthew, St. John, and St. Peter.

For what purpose did He suffer?

"To reconcile us to His Father."

How so?

By being "a sacrifice, not only for original guilt, but also for actual sins of men."

What do you understand here by a sacrifice?

An offering made to God to remove His displeasure.

What is "original guilt?"

The guilt of the evil disposition with which we are all born.

What are "actual sins?"

The sins which we have done ourselves.

Prove that the death of our Lord was a sacrifice offered to the Father.

Eph. v. 2; Heb. ix. 12. "Christ loved us, and hath given Himself for us an offering and a sacrifice unto God:" and "by His own blood He entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us."

Prove that He was a sacrifice for our original guilt.

Rom. v. 12, 14, 18; Phil. ii. 8. "As by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, even so by the righteousness of One the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life." For "He became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."

Prove that He was a sacrifice for actual sins.

Isa. liii. 5, 6; 1 St. John ii. 1, 2.

Prove that He became a sacrifice to reconcile us to His Father.

Rom. v. 10. "We were reconciled to God by the death of His Son."

Article III.

What is the subject of the third Article?

"The going down of Christ into hell."

In what sense was Christ dead and buried for us?

He died in order that He might undergo in our behalf the punishment due to sin; and He was buried in order that the fact of His death might be placed beyond dispute.

Why was this important?

In order that we might have the surest reliance on the reality of His resurrection and atonement. What is the force of the "as" and "so also" in this Article?

It shows that His going down into hell is of similar importance to His death and burial.

What is meant by "hell" in this Article?

"The place of departed spirits;" which the Church in the United States allows to be used as an equivalent expression.

How do you prove that Jesus went down into hell?

St. Peter (Acts ii. 31) says, concerning Jesus, that "His soul was not left in hell;" which of course implies that He went thither.

Show that the phrase "went down" is scriptural in relation to this subject.

Eph. iv. 9.

For what reason is it important to believe that Christ descended into hell?

Because otherwise His soul would not have undergone the full penalty of sin, nor would He have passed through all that mankind are destined to. Moreover, it was needful that He should go and proclaim to "the spirits in prison" the fact of His triumph over death. (1 St. Peter iii. 19.)

Give another reason.

Because if we believe that He descended into hell, we shall not so much dread to undergo that which He has undergone before us.

Article IV.

What is the subject of the fourth Article?

"The resurrection of Christ."

Why does the Article state that Christ "did truly rise again from the dead?"

Because some in ancient times denied a literal resurrection, and declared that it was only figurative.

How is the truth of His resurrection proved?

By the testimony of those who saw Him after He arose, by the gifts He bestowed on His followers after His resurrection, and by the rapid spread of the Gospel built upon the belief of this truth.

What is "the perfection of man's nature" here meant?

The completeness of His nature, as composed of body and soul.

What other things besides "flesh and bones" are essential to that completeness?

The senses, and power of bodily motion and action, &c.

Prove that Jesus took again His body, &c.

St. Luke xxiv. 39, 43. When He appeared to His disciples after His resurrection, He requested them to handle Him and see that He had flesh and bones, and He afterwards ate in their presence.

Prove that He ascended into heaven with His body. St. Luke xxiv. 50, 51; Acts i. 9. "He lifted up His hands and blessed" the Apostles; and immediately after "while they beheld, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight."

Prove that He sitteth there with His body.

It appears from St. Mark xvi. 19, that in whatever manner "He was received into heaven," in the same manner "He sat down on the right hand of God."

What is He there doing?

Pleading the merits of His own sacrifice on the cross before the Father, for the benefit of His people on earth.

Prove that He will remain in heaven until the day of judgment.

In Acts iii. 20, 21, it is said that "the heavens must receive Him until the times of the restitution of all things," that is, when all things will be made new; which will take place at His second coming to judgment.

Article V.

What is the subject of the fifth Article?

"The Holy Ghost."

What is meant by the Holy Ghost "proceeding from the Father and the Son?

That He issues forth from them and is sent by them.

Prove that He proceeds from the Father.

John xv. 26; Matt. x. 20. He is called "the Spirit of truth that proceedeth from the Father," and "the Spirit of the Father."

Prove that He proceeds from the Son.

In Rom. viii. 9, and 1 Pet. i. 11, He is called "the Spirit of Christ."

When did He proceed from the Father and the Son?

From all eternity.

Show that He is "of one substance with the Father and the Son."

It has been already proved that the Son is of one substance with the Father; if therefore the Holy Ghost is of one substance with the Father, He must be of one substance with both.

Prove that He is of one substance with the Father.

1 Cor. iii. 16, 17. The Spirit of God dwelling in us makes us temples of God.

Show that He is "of one majesty and glory with the Father and the Son."

This follows from His being of one substance with the Father and the Son.

Prove it directly from Holy Scripture.

Isa. vi. 3. The Holy Ghost is magnified by the heavenly host equally with the Father and the Son.

What is meant by the expression "very God?"

That He is God in the fullest sense.

Show that He is "eternal God."

It would follow from His being the Spirit of the Father, because He must endure as long as the Father.

Prove it directly from Scripture.

Heb. ix. 14. He is called "the eternal Spirit."

Part II

PART II.

What is the subject of the second division of the thirty-nine Articles?

The rule of faith.

What Articles does it comprise?

From the sixth to the eighth inclusive.

Article VI.

What is the subject of the sixth Article?

"The sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for salvation."

What is the declaration of the article on this subject?

"Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation."

What presumption is there from reason in favour of this assertion?

As God knew the uncertainty and variableness of traditionary knowledge, it is reasonable to suppose that He provided that whatever was necessary to salvation should be committed to writing.

Support it from Scripture.

2 Tim. iii. 15—17. This being true of the Old Testament under the old dispensation, it follows by analogy that it is true of that and the New Testament united under the new dispensation.

What other ground is there for believing it?

It was held in the primitive Church without contradiction and for many hundreds of years.

In what sense does the Article assert that Holy Scripture contains all things necessary for salvation?

"That whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required to be believed as an Article of the Faith, or to be thought requisite or necessary for salvation."

For what class of persons in the Church is this direction principally intended?

For those who teach and govern.

In what sense is the term "of any man" to be taken?

By any man.

In what manner may those who teach and govern in the Church require persons to believe and think in any particular manner?

By censuring them, or depriving them of Church privileges, if they do not so believe or think.

How can they know what they believe or think?

When they either deny the truth or necessity of what they are taught, or act so as to show that they do not receive it as true or necessary.

How far does the Article affect the members of the Church generally?

It shows that they cannot, according to the principles of the Church, be censured or debarred from Christian privileges for disbelieving or refusing to acknowledge as necessary to salvation, things which are not directly contained in the Scriptures, or are not proved from them.

What does the Church here mean by "Holy Scripture?"

"Those canonical books of the Old and New Testament, of whose authority there was never any doubt in the Church."

What is meant by canonical books?

Those books which contain the rule of Christian faith and duty, and by which consequently controversies may and ought to be decided.

Why are they called canonical?

The word canon signifies a rule.

Mention the canonical books of the Old Testament.

Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, the First Book of Samuel, the Second Book of Samuel, the First Book of Kings, the Second Book of Kings, the First Book of Chronicles, the Second Book of Chronicles, the First Book of Esdras, the Second Book of Esdras, the Book of Esther, the Book of Job, the Psalms, the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes or Preacher, Cantica, or Songs of Solomon, Four Prophets the greater, Twelve Prophets the less.

What is meant by the first and second books of Esdras?

The books of Ezra and Nehemiah.

Why is the book of Nehemiah called the second book of Esdras?

Because it contains the continuation of the history of Ezra.

Who are the four greater prophets?

Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel.

Why are not the Lamentations of Jeremiah mentioned here?

Because they are considered part of the book of Jeremiah.

Who are the twelve lesser prophets?

Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi.

What other books does the Article mention as pertaining to the Old Testament?

The Third Book of Esdras, the Fourth Book of Esdras, the Book of Tobias, the Book of Judith, the rest of the Book of Esther, the Book of Wisdom, Jesus the Son of Sirach, Baruch the Prophet, the Song of the Three Children, the Story of Susanna, of Bel and the Dragon, the Prayer of Manasses, the First Book of Maccabees, the Second Book of Maccabees.

What are the third and fourth books of Esdras called in our common Bibles?

The first and second books of Esdras.

What is the book of Tobias called?

The book of Tobit.

What is the book of Jesus the Son of Sirach called?

Ecclesiasticus. Who are "the Three Children" here mentioned?

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.

What Manasses is the one mentioned?

Manasseh the son of Hezekiah.

What difference is there between the use of these books and that of the canonical books?

The canonical books are used both to give us practical examples and instruction, and to establish doctrines; the other books are not applied to establish doctrine, but only read "for example of life and instruction of manners" or conduct.

Why does the Church make this difference between these books?

Because the whole Church of Christ for four hundred years made such a difference.

But do these books then differ in nothing from common religious or historical books?

They differ in this respect, that their writers are considered to be trustworthy and credible in matters of example and precept.

Where does the Church show that this is her opinion?

Partly by many expressions in the Homilies, and partly by appointing some portions of them to be read in divine service on the saints' days.

What is the meaning of the word Apocrypha?

It means doubtful. That is, the Church does not determine respecting the authenticity or genuineness of these books. Which of these books are never read in Church, according to the calendar of the Church of England?

The books of Esdras, the prayer of Manasses, and the books of the Maccabees.

From which of the Apocryphal books are lessons appointed in the calendar of the Church in the United States?

From the book of Wisdom, and Ecclesiasticus or the book of Jesus the Son of Sirach.

Which of these books is quoted by St. Paul in Heb. xi.?

The second book of Maccabees.

For what purpose?

For example of life; to show that faith leads men to suffer courageously in the cause of God.

Mention the canonical books of the New Testament.

The Gospel according to St. Matthew, the Gospel according to St. Mark, the Gospel according to St. Luke, and the Gospel according to St. John; the Acts of the Apostles, the fourteen Epistles of St. Paul, the Epistle of St. James, the two Epistles of St. Peter, the three Epistles of St. John, the Epistle of St. Jude, the Apocalypse, or Revelation of St. John.

Was there not some doubt at an early period whether the Apocalypse and some of the Epistles should be regarded as canonical?

Not in the Church at large, but only by some particular persons or churches.

Article VII.

What is the subject of the seventh Article?

"The Old Testament."

What are the two questions concerning the Old Testament, chiefly treated of in this Article?

1. Whether the promises of the Old Testament were merely transitory and temporal.

2. In what degree the Old Testament is binding upon Christians.

How does the Article decide the first question?

"They are not to be heard, which feign that the old Fathers did look only for transitory promises."

Who are meant by "the old Fathers?"

The good men whose history is recorded in the Old Testament.

How does the Article prove that they looked for something more than transitory promises?

By asserting that "the Old Testament is not contrary to the New: for both in the Old and New Testament everlasting life is offered to Mankind by Christ, who is the only Mediator between God and Man, being both God and Man."

Prove that everlasting life was offered to mankind under the Old Testament. David, in Psalm xvi. 11, contemplated a "life in God's presence, where there is fulness of joy and pleasures for evermore:" and St. Paul, in Heb. xi. 13-16, says, respecting the ancient Israelites, that "they looked for a better country, that is, a heavenly;" and our Lord testifies that the Jews thought that in the Scriptures they had eternal life.

Prove that it was offered through Christ.

Gen. xxii. 18; Gal. iii. 16; St. John viii. 56; 1 Cor. x. 4. Abraham was told that in his seed, which is Christ, all nations should be blessed; and our Lord testifies that Abraham saw the day of Christ and was glad; and St. Paul, that the Israelites "drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them; and that Rock was Christ."

Why could not eternal life be offered to mankind by any other than Christ?

Because He is the only Mediator between God and man. 1 Tim. ii. 5.

What is meant by His being the only Mediator between God and man?

That He alone has opened a way of reconciliation between God and all mankind, by offering Himself a sacrifice for all men. See Isa. liii. 5, 6; 1 Tim. ii. 6.

Why is it especially stated that He is "both God and man?"

Because that fully qualified Him to be a Mediator between God and man.

What is the second subject treated of in the Article? The degree in which the Old Testament is binding upon Christians.

How does the Article decide the question?

That "the Law given from God by Moses, as touching Ceremonies and Rites, does not bind Christian men," and that "the Civil precepts thereof ought not of necessity to be received in any commonwealth;" but that "no Christian man whatsoever is free from the obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral."

Prove that the law of Moses does not bind Christians in regard to ceremonies and rites.

St. Paul blames Christians for thinking it necessary to observe the "holy days, new moons, and sabbaths" of the law of Moses, and the law of circumcision. See Gal. iii. 24, 25, compared with iv. 9, 10; v. 1, 2; Col. ii. 16, 17. But, on the other hand, many of the Levitical ordinances were typical of sacraments and rites in the Christian Church.

What do you mean by the "Civil precepts" of the Law of Moses?

The precepts which concern men as members of society under earthly rulers.

Prove that they are not binding upon Christians.

Rom. xiii. 1. Because under the New Testament we are required to be "subject to the higher powers" of the country in which we live, which is inconsistent with observing the law of Moses.

What is meant by "the moral commandments?" Those commandments which regulate our general conduct towards God and each other.

Where are they briefly summed up?

In the Ten Commandments.

Prove that they are binding upon Christians.

St. Matt. v. 17-20; Rom. viii. 4. Our Lord in His sermon on the Mount says that "whosoever shall do and teach them, shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven;" and St. Paul says that the object of the Gospel is "that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us."

Article VIII.

What is the subject of the eighth Article?

"The Three Creeds."

What is a Creed?

A form of words in which we profess our belief in certain divine things or truths.

What is the Creed which is here named "Nicene Creed?"

That which is said in the Communion Office, in the Church of England, and allowed to be said in the Morning and Evening Service in the Church in the United States.

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…