Read here

Stories and story-telling in moral and religious education

Edward Porter St. John · 1918 · Scanned text · Free in the US

30,649 words · about 2 h 9 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Free in the US: this text is in the public domain in the United States; it may still be in copyright elsewhere.

Licence: PD · Library of Congress states the book is in the public domain and free to use and reuse (https://data.labs.loc.gov/digitized-books/README.html); published 1918, public domain asserted for the US only · Library of Congress, Selected Digitized Books (https://www.loc.gov/item/18019496); text via the Common Pile (CC BY 4.0 compilation, per-document rights preserved)

Text from Library of Congress, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Edward Porter St. John
Language
English
Published
1918
Length
30,649 words · about 2 h 9 min
Sections
15 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain in the United States

 

Contents (15)

Continue:

Introduction

More and more, in these days, the leaders of educational thought are coming to recognize the significance /^f nature's informal means of training her children. .Viodern psychology finds in natural play a more valuable means of education than any pedagogical device ever formulated by a professional teacher, and points out that it is such because it is nature's own, because it leads to expression the mental and physical powers of the child and youth precisely as they mature, and in the exact ways that ages of racial experience have shown to be most valuable to man. So it begins to recognize in story-telling the earliest, the simplest, and so far as moral influence Is concerned, the most universally effective means of impressing upon a new generation the lessons that have been learned by those who have gone before.

It has no charm of novelty, but it is only the shallow mind that discredits the old because it is old. Nature is chief of all conservatives. The things that had large influence in shaping man's individual nature or his social customs she never wholly discards. Man's oldest possessions are the really indispensable ones. The traits that served the race in its infancy arc the ones that mark the unfolding life of every child, and though they may withdraw themselves from casual notice during the active years of maturity the fact that they again force themselves into prominence in old age and are the last to fail in the final dissolution is evi- [ vii ]

INTRODUCTION

dence that, unnoticed, they have served their purpose during the intervening years.

Such a place as this story-telHng has in the education of the race. Long before teachers or text-books appeared instruction v^^as given in story form to the children v^rho gathered about the mother's knee. Youths, grouped about their elders before the evening camp-fire, thrilled to the story of old deeds of valor and braced their souls to vie with the heroes who had won the admiration of their fathers' fathers. Modern mothers, not knowing why they do it, use the same magic to gain the same ends. The great German prophet of childhood gave the story a large and honored place in the rarely wise and successful institution which he founded. From time to time prophet and sage, preacher and statesman have made it their tool for the shaping of human conduct and character.

So instinct and genius have made it their method in the past. Now, perhaps more consciously and thoughtfully than ever before, teachers are seeking to make it a part of their equipment. In the field of moral and religious education this movement is beginning to be felt, yet not as deeply or as widely as it should be. The Sunday-school, our special institution for moral and religious culture, has not made as large use of the method as has the home and the public school (at least in the kindergarten), and in all three of these institutions what has been attempted has been chiefly with the younger children. With such it is almost the only method to be used. With the older pupils other means of influence are available, but this one never loses its power if it be used with tactful adaptation to changing interests and motives. It has its large place in dealing with the adolescent, and with the adult as well.

These brief chapters have been prepared with the [ viii ]

INTRODUCTION

desire to aid parents, teachers, and workers in settlements, vacation schools, and less formal agencies of moral education who are as yet unskilled in the use of stories. The instruction given is designedly elementary in its nature, and always keeps in mind the aim of character-building. The plans suggested are offered with less of diffidence because they have been tested in the classroom for a number of years with satisfactory results. More than a few, some of whom had never attempted to tell a story, have under their guidance developed unusual skill as story-tellers, both as entertainers and as teachers.

The writer has sought to acquaint himself with the readily accessible literature of the subject and with the desire to be helpful rather than to be original has availed himself of helpful suggestions wherever he found them. He desires especially to mention his personal indebtedness to Dr. Walter L. Hervey's Picture Work. The fact that no adequate discussion of the use of stories for purposes of moral and religious education has yet appeared is sufficient justification of the present modest effort.

The chapters may be read in a few hours, and it is hoped not wholly without profit to those who have already served their apprenticeship. To those who use the book in that way the writer offers no apology for hints at the close of each chapter which savor of the text-book; for beginners, for whom it is especially designed, can not afford to omit study and persistent practise.

Since story-telling always implies an audience, cooperative work will be especially helpful. A teachertraining class or a story club will afford opportunity for mutual observation and criticism and for discussion and exchange of story material, and will multiply the value of study of the book. One of the best means of [ix]

INTRODUCTION

securing such an opportunity is through the organization of a local branch of the National Story-Tellers' League, information concerning which may be obtained by addressing The Story Tellers' Magazine which is published at the office of the League, 27 West 23 rd St., New York City.

In such groups parents, Sunday-school and public school teachers, kindergartners, and young people often unite with advantage to all. After the first meetings, which should be made as easy as possible for the beginners, programs may be arranged which will lead the members into new fields and enlarge their repertories as their skill increases. In such a scheme successive meetings might be devoted, for example, to modern fairy-tales, hero stories, Norse myths, folk-tales of the East, Christmas stories, myths and folk-tales of the American Indians, humorous stories, love stories, stories of the medieval saints, Thanksgiving stories, animal stories, fables, stories from history, etc. The interests of the members would determine the selection of the topics and their grouping in an orderly way.

In every group so formed the writer wishes that he might have a listener's place.

Contents

I. The Educational Value of the Story . i

II. What a Story Really Is 8

III. The Use of Idealistic Stories . . . i6

Chapter I The Educational Value Of The Story

All the world loves a story, but, after all, few have' learned to take story-telling seriously. Every heart responds to the charm of a well-told tale, but even among teachers comparatively few have realized that usually there are moral forces among those feelings that are stirred. When stories have been told for any purpose beyond that of mere entertainment, commonly it has been as the first step in Hterary training, or simply to call back the wandering attention of the pupil to a lesson that is essentially dull. Still, such stories as have been \ased have had their secret influence, and character has been shaped for good or ill. In every age, however, really great teachers who have had character-building as a conscious aim have known the value of the story and have made it a most effective means of shaping the Hves of both old and young. Jesus, Plutarch, the monks of the Middle Ages, Froebel, and the kindergartners of to-day have not failed of accomplishing their aim.

" Good story-telling is the best intellectual qualification of the teacher," our greatest educationist has said. If he had the teacher of children in mind there is no exaggeration. Of the teacher of youth and of the average of adults it is almost equally true, so far as moral influence is concerned.

The very origin of story-telling was in the teaching impulse. Its chief significance throughout the long past of primitive life, when it v^^as almost the only form of literature, was certainly educational. Events which were fraught with meaning were kept alive in memory and handed down from one generation to another that they might help to shape the life of youth. In this way men gave the warning of the certain penalty which nature inflicts upon those who break her laws. So they sought to stir the sleeping spirit of hero-worship and aspiration. Aside from purely unconscious imitation the story is almost the only pedagogical means used by primitive men. And as we trace the development of human culture we find that it does not lose its place in the higher stages.

Every race has its heritage of folk-tales and myths that have a far larger meaning than the mere entertainment of the young. Scientists study these stories of the past with painstaking care, because they reveal the genius of the people. Not only do they reflect the ideals which have shaped the social and religious Hfe. but they have shaped those ideals and have given them form and power. As factors in molding character the stories of the gods are not less important than the rites of worship.

China, India, Arabia, Japan, honored the story-teller: they felt his charm and were molded by his magic. For centuries the stories of Homer formed the only literary content of education among the Greeks, and they kept their place through the succeeding years of a culture that we hardly equal to-day. When Roman education was at its best, stories of their national heroes and statesmen such as we find in Plutarch's Lives formed [ 3 ]

EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE STORY

one of the most important parts of the curriculum. How largely the Hebrew life was shaped by story a glance at the Old Testament will reveal.

All the long line of skalds, jongleurs, and bards of the European peoples were story-tellers in the truest sense. All their songs were of the ballad-epic type. Music and verse were the adornments of the tale, and indeed served a more practical purpose than that, as they were an aid to memory before the songs were committed to writing — a device which many of us remember from the days when we sang the multiplication tables in the arithmetic class or the Palestine geography song in the Sunday-school. The minnesingers and troubadours sang chiefly of love and with them versification and music came to receive more emphasis. On the other hand the minstrels of the age of chivalry with their songs of noble deeds were honored for their influence upon character, and had a recognized place in the educational system of feudahsm.

In our own days and among our own people the story still manifests its power. In more lines than one Dickens was most eff'ectively a reformer. Uncle Tom's Cabin outweighed in influence thousands of sermons and tens of thousands of pages of antislavery tracts a generation ago. Ramona and Black Beauty have not been without their practical influence. Who will dare to say that all the books on ethics have influenced American life as much as the product of the novelist's pen ?

From the very first the Christian Church has utilized this power. The stories of the Gospels have done infinitely more to influence the lives of men than all the books of systematic theology that the Church has produced in twenty centuries of time. The stories of the saints that arose during the Middle Ages were not without their meaning and their power. In the midst of bar- [ 3 ]

ren asceticism and scholastic wrangling they kept simple faith alive and stirred the longing for fellowship with God. The preachers of our own day who have had widespread popular influence have been those who have not scorned the story-teller's art. No one forgets the stories of a Moody, a Talmage, or a Spurgeon, and thousands have been unable to close their hearts against the messages that those stories brought.

Jesus was a master story-teller. He did not invent the parable; the rabbis used it constantly; but so skilful was his use of this device that in our thought it is associated almost wholly with his name. As we shall see, his stories were marvels of perfection both in form and use. When we study them we do not wonder that the common people heard him gladly. It is not strange that the stories impressed his followers so strongly that many of them found place in the record of his life and teaching. Nor was it only for those throngs that followed him among the hills of Palestine that those stories were voiced. Most of us feel that we have gained our clearest and most impressive knowledge of his teachings from those parables or from the simple account of his life which is The Story of the Gospels. When we wish to minister to a needy heart we commonly turn to that story of his life or to one of those other stones that he told.

In other ways our own attitude toward the Bible is significant. A test as to the extent to which the content of the book has impressed itself upon the average member of the Sunday-school will give telling evidence. Examine any class, old or young, on the concrete content and moral teaching of the book of Genesis; then repeat the test with the prophecy of Jeremiah. Or test the knowledge of I Samuel as compared with that of Isaiah or Colossians. The fact that many more of our Sunday-school lessons have been chosen from the historical than [ 4 ]

EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE STORY

from the prophetical or doctrinal books does not weaken the evidence, for that fact must be explained. Few would contend that the moral and religious teachings of Genesis and i Samuel are higher than those of the prophets and apostles. More lessons are chosen from those books because they contain more material of real educational value for the average mind. They are full of stories. The very fact of their selection is a strong, if unconscious, tribute to the value of the story as a pedagogical device.

The loss of a love for stories may be the result of sophistication, but it is not an evidence of wisdom. To feel contempt for their use reveals ignorance of the art of education. The conscientious teacher will hardly be content to say, " I cannot tell a story.'' He will make himself a teller of tales. This is his duty and his opportunity, and when he has mastered the simple art it will be his joy as well.

Stories are the oldest form of transmitted culture, and the most formative. — Richard G. Moulton.

The household story was the earliest ethical study in the educational curriculum of the race. — Quoted by Nora Archibald Smith.

Every fairy-tale worth reading at all is a remnant of a tradition possessing true historical value; historical at least in so far as it has naturally arisen out of the mind of a people under special circumstances, and risen not without meaning, nor removed altogether from the sphere of religious truth. — yohn Ruskin.

The Pueblo child does not receive commands to do or to refrain from doing without the reason for the command being given in the form of a story, in which the given action is portrayed with the good or evil resulting to the doer. — F. C. Spencer.

The narrative which extends from Genesis to Esther is found, in its literary analysis, to be an alternation between two forms: a framework and connective tissue of history, with the high lights and spiritual essence of the whole given by brilliant stories. — Richard G. Moulton.

I would rather be the children's story-teller than the queen's favorite or the king's counsellor. — Kate Douglas Wiggin.

Let me tell the stories and I care not who writes the text-books. — G. Stanley Hall.

Consider what stories that you have heard or read have largely influenced your life. Do not overlook any whether long or short, whether fiction, biography, history, or the informal story of another life. Most stories that have deeply impressed you will be found to have had an appreciable influence.

Ask your acquaintances for similar facts from their own experience. If you belong to a story-teller's league or to a club or class that is making a study of story-telling, discuss these facts freely. Notice how some stories that would now be rejected because of literary imperfections were morally helpful to the members during their childhood.

The value of the story attested by

a. Its origin.

b. Its use by many peoples.

c. Its influence in social reforms.

d. Its place in Christian teaching.

e. Its use by Jesus.

/. Its influence in our own lives.

Sara Wiltse, The Story in Early Education^ pp. 1-3. G. Stanley Hall, Sunday-school and Bible Teachings Pedagogical Seminary, Vol. VHI, pp. 448-450. [ 6 ]

EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE STORY

Nora Archibald Smith, The Children of the Future, pp. 101-104. Ezra Allen, The Pedagogy of Myth in the Grades, Pedagogical

Seminary, Vol. VIII, pp. 258-277.

S. B, Haslett, The Pedagogical Bible School, pp. 241-244. William Byron Forbush, Manual of Stories, pp. 3-16. E. N. and G. E. Partridge, Story Telling in Home and School,

Walter Taylor Field, Fingerposts to Children's Reading, pp.

9-36.

Angela M. Keyes, Stories and Story Telling, pp. 4-12.

Chapter II

Nothing, one would think, is less in need of definition than a story; yet many fail of success in story-telling precisely because they do not know in what a story consists. Description and exposition are related literary forms with which the story is sometimes confused.

Description deals chiefly with things, and seeks to give definiteness of impression by adding details to details. The story finds its material in events, and especially in action: it presents the movement as flowing toward one end and in its impression emphasizes the wholes of conduct.

The purpose of exposition is to make clear by explanation. Accuracy and orderliness are the essential qualities. As in the case of description it lacks the consistent and unified action which characterizes the story.

Both of these forms appear at times in the story, but always in a subordinate place. Sometimes substantially the same material may be presented in diff'erent literary forms. For example, the Twenty-third Psalm approaches description in its form, though it is expository in its nature. William Allen Knight's Song of Our Syrian Guest is an exposition of the psalm. Miss Cragin's Lost Lamb presents the same general material in story form.

The very words suggest that history and story have much in common, but they are not the same. History [ 8 ]

is a form of narrative, but it appeals especially to the sense of reality and of the connectedness of things. It is essentially a record of events that have an importance in themselves, and it makes much of their mutual relations and their causes and consequences. The story makes its appeal chiefly to the imagination and the feelings. Imaginary events can never become history, but certain events of history may become story if they are so presented as to make their appeal to the feehngs. History suggests the clashing of nations, the progress of civilization, successive changes through long periods of time. The story implies unity, completion, and Hmitation to a comparatively narrov^ field.

A story, then, may be said to be a narrative of true or imaginary events v^hich form a vitally related whole, so presented as to make its appeal chiefly to the emotions rather than the intellect. Each one of these characteristics, as w^e shall see, contributes directly to the pov^er of the story as an educational device.

A closer analysis of the Hterary form that the story takes reveals certain essential elements that are common to every tale. All successful story-tellers, though they may be untrained, recognize them, and consciously or unconsciously observe certain rules in connection v^ith their use. Only as the teacher conforms to these natural requirements can he effectively use the story as a means to an end in moral education. Hov^ever strong he may be in argument or exposition, if he does not appreciate these fundamental characteristics of the story, he is at as great a disadvantage as the w^orkman v^ho knov^^s the qualities of no metals save copper and lead when he is asked to shape a tool from steel.

In every story provision must be made for four elements: the beginning, a succession of events, the climax, and the end. Each serves its peculiar purpose, and that [ 9 ]

it may do it effectively must be shaped with that end in view.

Every story of necessity has a beginning; but though it cannot be omitted it may easily be bungled. And it is as true of story-telling as of racing that a bad start often means a handicap that cannot be overcome. It is because so few persons consider the way a story begins a matter of importance that so many fail at just this point.

The beginning of a story corresponds to the formal step of preparation in teaching a lesson. Its function is in part to introduce and characterize the leading person or persons, and sometimes to provide a background for the action. But aside from this preparation for the facts of the story it is especially desirable that It should arouse interest, and often it adds much to the story's power if it gives a hint of the line of thought that is to be developed, or if it awakens the kind of feeling that the denouement is to stir.

One invariable rule may guide the novice here, — the shorter this introductory step, the better, provided it accomplishes its purpose. Long explanations are tiresome, especially when they are given before there is anything to explain. We all remember how we used to omit not only the preface and introduction, but as well the opening chapters of certain historical novels. If our custom has changed, it is because we seek more than the story now. Let us not forget that the writer gives his audience an option here that one who tells his stories cannot. It is safest to assume that the story is what the hearer wants.

In our youthful days we sometimes found stories of

another sort. How we delighted in those that plunged

us at once into the midst of excitement and mystery,

and allowed us to gather by the way as much of explana-

[ lO ]

tion as the progress of the story demanded ! These are better models. In such stories as the teacher uses it is commonly best to begin where the story does.

Much that is usually given in the form of introduction may better be conveyed by the use of adjectives and qualifying phrases or bits of description introduced in connection v^ith the action of the story. If it is not possible to depend upon this method alone, a very few sentences will usually suffice for the introductory matter if the step has been thoughtfully planned.

The sequence of events presents the movement of the story toward the climax which gives meaning to the whole. The great essential is that it shall be orderly, presenting the necessary facts step by step, and preparing for the climax without revealing it in advance. Here the beginner is often at fault. The story seems to be progressing smoothly when suddenly with evident confusion the narrator says, "Oh, I forgot to tell you," etc. The loss is not simply in artistic effect. Attention is directed to this particular item; it is evident that it is essential, and at once the hearer attempts to foresee the end. Whether the attempt is successful or not there is a distraction of attention and much of the force of the story is lost.

The climax is that which makes the story; for it all that precedes has prepared the way. It is the point upon which interest focuses. If a moral lesson is conveyed, it is here that it is enforced. Hence failure here means total failure. The reason why the "good story" sometimes seems so dull when it is related by an appreciative hearer is that he has missed the point in retelling it. It is for this that the story exists, and skill in dealing with it counts more for success than at any other point.

In each story the needs of the particular case will determine the mode of procedure, but some general hints may be given. The climax must not be missed, for without it there is no story. Whatever tends to obscure it or weaken its force lessens the story's power. Usually it is more impressive if there is something of surprise involved; with the humorous story this is absolutely essential. If the story is to leave a moral impression, the moral lesson must depend upon the cHmax itself.

Important as the climax is, if one has the moral aim in view the way in which the story is to end needs careful consideration. First of all it should appear that the story has really arrived at the stopping place. Thus far event has succeeded event, and the outcome has been in doubt. Until the final issue of a course of conduct appears, no effective moral lesson can be based upon it.

Again, while the attention is centered on an unsolved problem there can be no meditation on what has gone before. The nickel novel that closes with the hero clinging to a snapping branch that extends over a precipice two hundred feet in height does not defeat its purpose, for the aim is to sell another book; but if one would have a story teach a lesson, the mind must be left at rest, ready to turn back and think again of the deeper meaning of the tale. This ending of a story, however, must not be confused with the appending of a '* moral " : that would serve to put an end to the interest of the hearer rather than to the action of the tale.

Every good model enforces the rule that is indicated above. The fairy-tale ends with the classic phrase, " And they lived happily ever after." In the average novel it is when the villain dies and the hero wins his bride that the story ends. True, there may be a strenuous life awaiting the wedded pair, but " that is another story."

Sometimes the amateur's story wanders on and on simply because he feels that it has not come to an end. [ 12]

It is related that a child developed remarkable skill as a story-teller, except that she did not know how to stop. When the climax had been successfully passed she would add inconsequential details because, while she had nothing more to say, she felt that the story had not ended. At last she discovered an effectual way of bringing her stories to a close, and in future they ended with some such formula as this, — ** And one beautiful morning, as they were walking down the path to the front gate, they all died."

Most of us have at times wished that certain of our acquaintances had as keen and true a sense of the fitness of things as this child. Teachers who lack this instinct can improve their work by thoughtfully planning the story's end. In a short story in which few characters appear the climax may itself form the fitting close, but often a sentence or two must be added to give the sense of completion that enables the story to do its work.

To summarize, every good story must have a beginning that rouses interest, a succession of events that is orderly and complete, a climax that forms the story's point, and an end that leaves the mind at rest. Or, to put it in another way, the story has a here, action, a plot, and a solution.

The power quickly and accurately to analyze a story into these essential elements is the most fundamental and the most important part of the story-teller's theoretical training. It offers the certain means of determining whether a story is worth telling at all. It makes its retention by the memory a comparatively simple matter. It makes it easy to condense a story that is too long, and facilitates the successful expansion of one that is too brief. The importance of persistent drill in the performing of this process can hardly be over-emphasized. [ 13 ]

STORIES AND STORY-TELLING WHAT OTHERS SAY

The chief reason why some people cannot tell stories is because they have no story to tell. — Anna Buckland.

Historical narrative, for instance, usually has an explanatory purpose; it does not merely recite certain events; it explains their sequence, their relations, their causes and effects.

We read Robinson Crusoe or Ivanhoe or Mrs. Gaskell's Cranford or Stevenson's Treasure Island, not for information, but in order to be stirred or aroused. — Gardiner, Kittredge, and Arnold,

Merely to string a series of incidents together is not to tell a story. Much of the effect of the story depends upon the grouping of the incidents; the setting of the telling points in strong light and duly subordinating minor details. — Marvin R. Vincent,

The essential thing in narrative is to make something happen. — Gardiner, Kitiredge, and Arnold.

Study carefully half a dozen or more of good stories, analyzing them to determine the essential elements as indicated above. First of all decide what forms the climax. It will be difficult for the beginner to do this in some cases, but he should persist. Discuss difficult points at the story club or with your friends. Note the series of events leading up to the climax. Could any of them be omitted ? Is this order necessary f Note the way in which the story is introduced and the way it ends. Could either beginning or ending be improved ? Practise on condensing stories without omitting any essential points. Write out some short story from memory and then compare your version with the original, as to the way in which these four elements are dealt with in each case.

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…