Read here

Manual of orthopedic surgery, being a dissertation which obtained the Boylston prize for 1844, on the following question: "In what cases, and to what extent is the division of muscles, tendons, or other parts proper for the relief of deformity or lameness?"

Henry Jacob Bigelow · 1845 · Scanned text

47,385 words · about 3 h 19 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Licence: PD · Library of Congress states the book is in the public domain and free to use and reuse (https://data.labs.loc.gov/digitized-books/README.html); published 1845, author long deceased · Library of Congress, Selected Digitized Books (https://www.loc.gov/item/07005430); text via the Common Pile (CC BY 4.0 compilation, per-document rights preserved)

Text from Library of Congress, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Henry Jacob Bigelow
Language
English
Published
1845
Length
47,385 words · about 3 h 19 min
Sections
4 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain

 

Contents (4)
  1. Front matter about 1 min
  2. Preface about 1 min
  3. Contents about 3 h 10 min
  4. Appendix about 7 min

Continue:

Front matter

UNITED STATES OFAMERICA.

ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY.

^HHM^^H

Preface

The works I have consulted in writing the following Dissertation, are chiefly those of Guerin, Bonnet, Velpeau, Phillips, Duval and Little ; especially the brochures of the former, who has been for some time, the leading French orthopedist.

The writings of M. Guerin may be fairly criticised both for the wordiness and obscurity of their style, and for their unnecessary bulk ; but it does not appear that we have any right to question the accuracy of their statements. On the contrary, we may infer from the late report of the committee appointed by the Academy of Medicine to investigate this point, that there is no ground for supposing the evidence in any way warped or misrepresented.

It is possible that M. Guerin has availed himself of the suggestions of previous writers ; that in common with other specialists, he has over-estimated the importance and the efficacy of his art ; that he has been in-

Vlll PREFACE.

discreet in its application, and that " the division of forty-two tendons, muscles, &c, upon the same subject," was an audacious undertaking, rather than " a remarkable achievement ;" but it should not be forgotten that the scientific acquirements and practical skill of this orthopedist are undisputed ; that he is the author of valuable discoveries, confirmed as such by the Academy of Medicine, and that, much as he may be indebted to previous writers, the account has at least been squared, by the compensating drafts of those who have followed him.

The article upon Strabismus, the first of this dissertation, is somewhat disproportioned in length to the subsequent chapters. The materials were originally collected without the intention of incorporating them into this work. In allowing them to retain their present extent, I was decided mainly by the fact, that no complete treatise upon this subject had appeared upon this side of the water. The same is true of the chapter on Stammering, the operation for which is now a matter of history, a curious instance of the indiscreet zeal of some of the noted continental surgeons.

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…