Speeches, addresses, and occasional sermons

Front matter

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.

Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you.

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.

Preface

I HAVE collected in these volumes several Speeches^ Addresses and occasional Sermons, which I have delivered at various times during the last seven years. Most of them were prepared for some special emergency: only two papers, that on "The Relation of Jesus to his Age and the Ages," and that on " Immortal Life," were written without reference to some such emergency. All of them have been printed before, excepting the sermon " Of General Taylor," and the address on " The American Scholar;" some have been several times reprinted. I do not know that they are worthy of republication in this permanent form, but the leading ideas of these volumes are very dear to me, and are sure to live as long as the human race shall continue. So I have published a small edition, hoping that the truths which I know are contained in these pages will do a service long after the writer, and the occasion of their utterance, have passed off and been forgot. I offer them to whom they may concern.

THEODOEE PARKER,

CONTENTS OP VOLUME L

I

The Relation of Jesus to his Age and the Ages.— = A Sermon preaclied at tlie Thursday Lecture, in Boston, December 26, 1844 ...... page i

II

The Teue Idea oe a Christian Ciiukch. — A Discourse at tlie Installation of Theodore Parker as Minister of the Twenty-Eighth Congregational Church in Boston, on Suiiday, January 4, 1846 . » . . « . .23

in.

A Sermon op War. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, June 7, 1846 . » » 63

lY.

A Speech delivered at the Anti-War Meeting in Fanueil Hall, February 4, 1847, . . , .113

Y.

A Sermon oe the Mexican War. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, June 25, 1848 « « , .127

YI

A Sermon of the Perishing Classes in Boston.—-

Preached at the Melodeon on Sunday, August 30, 1846 . 185

(vii)

Vlll CONTENTS.

VIL

A Sermon of Mp:rchants. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, November 22, 1846 . . . . .227

yiii.

A Sermon of the Dangerous Classes in Society. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, January 31, 1847 279

IX.

A Sermon of Poverty. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, January 14, 1849 333

X.

A Sermon of the Moral Condition of Boston. — Preached at the Melodeon, on Sunday, February 11, 1849 364

I.

THE RELATION 01? JESUS TO HIS AGE AND THE AGES.— A SERMON PREACHED AT THE THURSDAY LECTURE, IN BOSTON, DECEMBER

JOHN VII. 48.

"Have any of the Rulers, or of the Pharisees, believed on him?"

In all the world there is nothing so remarkable as a great man ; nothing so rare ; nothing which so well repays study. Human nature is loyal at its heart, and is, always and everywhere, looking for this its true earthly sovereign. We sometimes say that our institutions, here in America, do not require great men ; that we get along better without than with such. But let a real, great man light on our quarter of the planet ; let us understand him, and straightway these democratic hearts of ours burn with admiration and with love. We wave in his words, like corn in the harvest wind. We should rejoice to obey him, for he would speak what we need to hear. Men are always half expecting such a man. But when he comes, the real, great man that God has 1 (1)

been preparing, — men are disappointed ; they do not recognize him. He does not enter the city through the gates which expectants had crowded. He is a fresh fact, brand new ; not exactly like any former fact. Therefore men do not recognize nor acknowledge him. His language is strange, and his form nnnsual. He looks revolutionary, and pulls ^ down ancient walls to build his own temple, or, at least, splits old rocks asnnder, and quarries anew fresh granite and marble.

There are two classes of great men. Now and then some arise whom all acknowledge to be great, soon as they appear. Such men have what is true in relation to the wants and expectations of to-day. They say, what many men wished but had not words for; they translate into thought what, as a dim sentiment, lay a biirning in many a heart, but could not get entirely written out into consciousness. These men find a welcome. Nobody misunderstands them.- The world follows at their chariotwheels, and flings up its cap and shouts its huzzas,—- for the world is loyal, and follows its king when it sees and knov/s him. The good part of the world follows the highest ma.n it comprehends ; the bad, whoever serves its turn.

But there is another class of men so great, that all cannot see their greatness. They are in advance of men's conjectures, higher than their dreams ; too good to be actual, think some. Therefore, say many, there must be some mistake ; this man is not so great as he seems ; nay, he is no great man at all, but an impostor. These men have what is true not merely in relation to the wants and expectations of men here and to-day ; but what is true in relation to the Universe, to Eternity, to God. They do not speak what you and I have been trying to say, and cannot; but what we shall one day years hence, wish to say, after we have improved and grown up to man's estate.

Now it seems to me, the men of this latter class, when they come, can never meet the approbation of the censors and guides of public opinion. Such as wished for a new great man had a superstition of the last one in their minds. They expected the new to be just like the old, but he is altogether unlike. Nature is rich, but not rich enough to waste any thing. So there are never two great men Yery strongly similar. Nay, this new great man, perhaps, begins by destroying much that the old one built up with tears and prayers. He shows, at first, the limitations and defects of the former great man ; calls in question his authority. He refuses all masters; bows not to tradition ; and with seeming iiTeverence, laughs in the face of the popular idols. How will the '^ respectable men," the men of a few good rules and those derived from their fathers ^^ the best of men and the wisest," — how will they regard this new gi-eat man ? They will see nothing remarkable in him

4 RELATION OP JESUS

except that he is fluent and superficial, dangerous and revolutionary. He disturbs their notions of order; he shows that the institutions of society are not perfect ; that their imperfections are not of granite or marble, but only of words written on soft wax, which may be erased and others written thereon anew. He shows that such imperfect institutions are less than one great man. The guides and censors of public opinion will not honor such a man, they will hate him. Why not ? Some others not half so well bred, nor well furnished with precedents, welcome the new great man ; welcome his ideas ; welcome his person. They say, " Behold a Prophet."

When Jesus, the son of Mary, a poor woman, wife of Joseph the carpenter, in the little town of Nazareth, when he " began to be about thirty years old," and began also to open his mouth in the synagogues and the highways, nobody thought him a great man at all, as it seems. " Who are you ? " said the guardians of public opinion. He found men expecting a great man. This, it seems, was the common opinion, that a great man was to arise, and save the Church, and save the State. They looked back to Moses, a divine man of antiquity, whose great life had passed into the world, and to whom men had done honor, in various ways ; amongst others, by telling all sorts of wonders he wrought, and declaring that none could be so great again ; none get so near to God.

They looked back also to the prophets, a long line of divine men, so they reckoned, but less than the awful Moses ; his stature was far above tiie nation, who hid themselves in his shadow. Now the well-instructed children of Abraham thought the next great man must be only a copy of the last, repeat his ideas, and work in the old fashion. Sick men like to be healed by the medicine which helped them the last time ; at least, by the customary drugs which are popular.

In Judea, there were then parties of men, distinctly marked. There were the Conservatives, — they represented the church, tradition, ecclesiastical or theocratical authority. They adhered to the words of the old books, the forms of the old rites, the tradition of the elders. " Nobody but a Jew can be saved," said they ; " he only by circumcision, and the keeping of the old formal law ; God likes that. He accepts nothing else.'' These were the Pharisees, v/ith their servants the Scribes. Of this class were the Priests and the Levites in the naain, the National party, the Native-Hebrew party of that time. They had tradition, Moses and the prophets ; they believed in tradition, Moses and the prophets, at least in public ; what they believed in private God knew, and so did they. I know nothing of that.

Then there was the indifferent party ; the Sadducees, the State. They had wealth, and they believed in it, both in public and private too. They had a more generous and extensive cultivation than the Pharisees. They had intercourse with foreigners, and understood the writers of Ionia and Athens which the Pharisee held in abhoiTcnce. These were sleek respectable men, who, in part, disbelieved the Jewish theology. It is no very great merit to disbelieve even in the devil, unless you have a positive faith in God to take up your affections. The Saddncee believed neither in angel nor resurrection — not at all in the immortality of the souL He believed in the state, in the laws, the constables, the prisons and the axe. In religious matters, it seems the Pharisee had a positive belief, only it was a positive belief in a great mistake. In religious matters the Sadducee had no positive beUef at all ; not even in an error : at least, some think so. Plis distinctive affirmation was but a denial. He believed what he saw with his eyes, touched with his fingers, tasted with his tongue. He never saw, felt, nor tasted immortal life ; he had no belief therein. There was once a heathen Sadducee who said, " My right arm is my God ! "

There was likewise a party of Come-outers. They despaired of the State and the Church too, and turned off into the wilderness, " where the wild asses quench their thirst," building up their organizations free, as they hoped, from all ancient tyrannies. The Bible says nothing directly of these men in its canonical books. It is a curious omission ; but two

TO HIS AGE AND TPIE AGES. 7

Jews, each acquainted with foreign waiters, Josephus and Philo, give an account of these. These were the Essenes, an ascetic sect, hostile to marriage, at least, many of them, who lived in a sort of association by themselves, and had all things in common.

The Pharisees and the Sadducees had no great living and ruling ideas ; none I mean which represented man, his hopes, wishes, affections, his aspirations and power of progress. That is no very rare case, perhaps, you will say, for a party in the Church or the State to have no such ideas, but they had not even a plausible substitute for such ideas. They seemed to have no faith in man, in his divine nature, his power of improvement. The Essenes had ideas ; had a positive belief; had faith in man, but it was weakened in a great measure by their machinery. They, like the Pharisee and the Sadducee, were imprisoned in their organization, and probably saw no good out of their own party lines.

It is a plain thing that no one of these three parties would accept, acknowledge, or even perceive the greatness of Jesus of Nazareth. His ideas were not their notions. He was not the man they were looking for ; not at all the Messiah, the anointed one of God, which they wanted. The Sadducee expected no new great man unless it was a Roman qu^stor, or procurator; the Pharisees looked for a Pharisee stricter than Gamaliel ; the Essenes for an Ascetic. It is so now. Some seem to think that if Jesus were to come back to the earth, he v/ould preach Unitarian sermons, from a text out of the Bible, and prove his divine mission and the everlasting truths, the truths of necessity that he taught, in the Unitarian way, by telling of the miracles he wrought eighteen hu.ndred years ago ; that he would prove the immortality of the soul by the fact of his own corporeal resurrection. Others seem to think that he would deliver homilies of a severer character ; would rate men roundly about total depravity, and tell of unconditional election, salvation without works, and imputed righteousness, and talk of hell till the women and children fainted, and the knees of men smote together for trembling. Perhaps both would be mistaken.

So it was then. All these three classes of men, imprisoned in their prejudices and superstitions, were hostile. The Pharisees said, " We know that God spake unto Moses ; but as for this fellow, we know not whence he is. He blasphemeth Moses and the prophets ; yea, he hath a devil, and is mad, w^hy hear him ? " The Sadducees complained that " he stirred up the people ; " so he did. The Essenes, no doubt, would have it that he was ^' a gluttonous man and a wine-bibber, a friend of publicans and sinners." Tried by these three standards, the judgment was true ; what could he do to please these three parties ? Nothing ! nothing that he would do. So they hated him ; all hated him, and sought to destroy him. The cause is plain. He was so deep they could not see his profoundness ; too high for their comprehension ; too far before them for their sympathy. He was not the great man of the day. He found all organizations against him ; Church and State. Even John the Baptist, a real prophet, but not the prophet, doubted if Jesus was the one to be followed. If Jesus had spoken for the Pharisees, they would have accepted his speech and the speaker too. Had he favored the Sadducees, he had been a great man in their camp, and Herod would gladly have poured wine for the eloquent Galilean, and have satisfied the carpenter's son with purple and fine linen. Had he praised the Essenes, uttering their Shibboleth, they also would have paid him his price, have made him the head of their association perhaps, at least, have honored him in their way. He spoke for none of these. Why should they honor or even tolerate him ? It were strange had they done so. Was it through any fault or deficiency of Jesus, that these men refused him ? quite the reverse. The rain falls and the sun shines on the evil and the good ; the work of infinite power, wisdom and goodness is before all men, revealing the invisible things, yet the fool hath said, ay, said in his heart, " There is no God ! "

Jesus spoke not for the prejudices of such, and therefore they rejected him. But as he spoke truths for man, truths from God, truths adapted to man's condition there, to man's condition everywhere and always, when the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes went away, their lips curling with scorn ; when they gnashed vn one another with their teeth, there were noble men and humble women, who had long awaited the consolation of Israel, and they heard him, heard him gladly. Yes, they left all to follow him. Him! no, it was not him they followed ; it was God in him they obeyed, the God of truth, the God of love.

There were men not counted in the organized sects ; men weary of absurdities ; thirsting for the truth; sick, they knew not why nor of what, yet none the less sick, and Avaiting for the angel who should heal them, though by troubled waters and remedies unknown. These men had not the prejudices of a straightly organized and narrow sect. Perhaps they had not its knowledge, or its good manners. They were " unlearned and ignorant men," those early followers of Christ. Nay, Jesus himself had no extraordinary culture, as the world judges of such things. His townsmen wondered, on a famous occasion, how he had learned to. read. He knew little of theologies, it would seem; the better for him, perhaps. No doubt the better for us that he insisted on none. He knew they were not religion. The men of Galilee did not need theology. The youngest scribe in the humblest theological school at Jerusalem, if such a thing were in those daysj could have furnished theology enough to believe in a life-time. They did need religion ; they did see it as Jesus unfolded its loveliness ; they did welcome it when they saw; welcome it in their hearts. °

If I were a poet as sonie are born, and skilled to paint with words what shall stand out as real, to live before the eye, and then dwell in the affectionate memory for ever, I would tell of the audience which heard the Sermon on the mount, which listened to the parables, the rebukes, the beautiful beatitudes. They were plain men, and humble women; many of them foolish like you and me ; some of them sinners. But they all had hearts; had souls, all of them — hearts made to love, souls expectant of truth. "When he spoke, some said, no doLibt, '^ That is a new thing, that The true worshipper shall worship in spirit and in truth, as well here as in Jerusalem, nov/ as well as any time ; that also is a hard saying. Love your enemies ; forgive them, though seventy times seven they smite and offend you ; that notion that the law and the prophets are contained, all that is essentially religious thereof, in one precept. Love men as yourself, and God with all your might. This differs a good deal from the Pharisaic orthodoxy of the synagogue. That is a bold thing, presumptuous and revolutionary to say, I am greater than the temple, wiser than Solomon, a better symbol of God than both," But there was something deeper than

Jewish orthodoxy in their hearts ; something that Jewish orthodoxy could not satisfy, and what was yet more troublesome to ecclesiastical guides, something that Jewish orthodoxy could not keep down, nor even cover up. Sinners were converted at his reproof. They felt he rebuked v/hom he loved. .Yet his pictures of sin and sinners too, were any thing but flattering. There was small comfort in them. Still it was not the publicans and harlots who laid their hands on the place where their hearts should be, saying, " You hurt our feelings," and " we can't bear you ! " Nay, they pondered his words, repenting in tears. He showed, them their sin ; its cause, its consequence, its cure. To them he came as a Saviour, and they said, '^ Thou art well-come," those penitent Magdalens weeping at his feet.

It would be curious could we know the mingled emotions that swayed the crowd which rolled up around Jesus, following him, as the tides obey the moon, wherever he went ; curious to see how faces looked doubtful at first as he began to speak at Tabor or Gennesareth, Capernaum or Gischala, then how the countenance of some lowered and grew black with thunder suppressed but cherished, while the face of others shone as a branch of stars seen through some disparted cloud in a night of fitful storms, a moment seen and then withdrawn. It were curious to see how gradually many discordant feelings, passion, prejudice and pride were hushed before the tide of melodious religion he poured out around him, baptizing anew saint and sinner, and old and young, into one brotherhood of a common soul, into one immortal service of the universal God ; to see how this young Hebrew maid, deep-hearted, sensitive, enthusiastic, self-renouncing, intuitive of heavenly truth, rich as a young vine, with clustering affections just purpling into ripeness, — how she seized, first and all at once, the fair ideal, and with generous bosom confidingly embraced it too ; how that old man, gray-bearded, with baldness on his head, full of precepts and precedents, the lore of his fathers, the experience of a hard life, logical, slow, calculating, distrustful, remembering much and fearing much, but hoping little, confiding only in the fixed, his reverence for the old deepening as he himself became of less use, - — to see how he received the glad inspirations of the joiner's son, and wondering felt his youth steal slowly back upon his heart, reviving aspirations, long ago forgot, and then the crimson tide of early hope come gushing, tingling on through every limb ; to see how the young man halting between principle and passion, not yet petrified into worldhness, but struggling, uncertain, half reluctant, with those two serpents. Custom and Desire, that beautifully twined about his arms and breast and neck, their wormy folds, concealing underneath their burnished scales the dragon's awful strength, the viper's poison fang, the poor youth caressing 2

14 RELATION OP JESUS

their snaky crests, and toying with their tongues of flame — to see how he slowly, reluctantly, amid great questionings of heart, drank in the words of truth, and then, obedient to the angel in his heart, shook off, as ropes of sand, that hideous coil and trod the serpents underneath his feet. All this, it were curious, ay, instructive too, could we but see.

They heard him with welcome various as their life. The old men said, " It is Moses or Elias ; it is Jeremiah, one of the old prophets arisen from the dead, for God makes none such, now-a-days, in the sterile dotage of mankind.'' The young men and maidens doubtless it was that said, " This is the Christ ; the desire of the nations ; the hope of the world, the great new prophet; the Son of David; the Son of Man ; yes, the Son of God. He shall be our king." Human nature is loyal, and follows its king soon as it knows him. Poor lost sheep! the children of men look always for their guide, though so often they look in vain.

How he spoke, words deep and piercing ; rebukes for the wicked, doubly rebuking, because felt to have come out from a great, deep, loving heart. His first word was, perhaps, " Repent," but with the assurance that the kingdom of God was here and now, within reach of all. How his doctrines, those great truths of nature, commended themselves to the heart of each, of all simple-souled men looking for the truth! He spoke out of his experience; of course into theirs. He spoke great doctrines, truths vast as the soul, eternal as God, winged with beauty from the loveliness of his own life. Had he spoken for the Jews alone, his words had perished with that people ; for that time barely, the echo of his name had died away in his native hamlet ; for the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, you and I had heard of him but as a Rabbi ; nay, had never been blest by him at all. Words for a nation, an age, a sect, are of use in their place, yet they soon come to nought. But as he spoke for eternity, his truths ride on the wings of time ; as he spoke for man, they are welcome, beautiful and blessing, wherever man is found, and so must be till man and time shall cease.

He looked not back, as the Pharisee, save for illustrations and examples. He looked forward for his direction. He looked around for his work. There it lay, the harvest plenteous, the laborers few. It is always so. He looked not to men for his idea, his word to speak ; as little for their applause. He looked in to God, for guidance, wisdom, strength, and as water in the wilderness, at the stroke of Moses, in the Hebrew legend, so inspiration came at his call, a mighty stream of truth for the nation, faint, feeble, afraid, and wandering for the promised land ; drink for the thirsty, and cleansing for the unclean.

But he met opposition ; O, yes, enou.gh of it. How could it be otherwise ? It must be so. The very soul of peace, he brought a sworde His word

16 EELATION OF JESUS

was a consuming fire. The Pharisees wanted to be applauded, commended ; to have their sect, their plans, their traditions praised and flattered. His word to them was, " Repent ; '^ of them, to the people, " Such righteousness admits no man to the kingdom of heaven ; they are a deceitful prophecy, blind guides, hypocrites; not sons of Abraham, but children of the devil." They could not bear him ; no wonder at it. He was the aggressor ; had carried the war into the very heart of their system. They tiuned out of their company a man whose blindness he healed, because he confessed that fact. They made a law that all who believed on him, should also be cast out. "Well they might hate him, those old Pharisees. His existence was their reproach; his preaching their trial ; his life with its outward goodness, his piety within, was their condemnation. The man was their ruin, and they knew it. The cunning can see their own danger, but it is only men wise in mind, or men simple of heart, that can see their real, permanent safety and defence ; never the cunning, neither then, neither now,

Jesus looked to God for his truth, his great doctrines not his own, private, personal, depending on his idiosyncracies, and therefore only subjectively true, — but God's, universal, everlasting, the absolute religion. I do not know that he did not teach some errors also, along with it. I care not if he did. It is by his truths that I know him, the absolute religion he taught and lived ; by his highest sentiments that he is to be appreciated. He had faith in God and obeyed God ; hence his inspiration , great, in proportion to the greater endowment, moral and religious, which God gave him, great likewise in proportion to his perfect obedience. He had faith in man none the less. Who ever yet had faith in God that had none in man? I laiow not. Surely no inspired prophet. As Jesus had faith in man, so he spoke to men. Never yet, in the wide world, did a prophet arise, appealing with a noble heart and a noble life to the soul of goodness in man, but that soul answered to the call. It was so most eminently with Jesus. The Scribes and Pharisees could not understand by what authority he taught. Poor Pharisees ! how could they ? His phylacteries were no broader than those of another man ; nay, perhaps he had no phylacteries at all, nor even a broad-bordered garment. Men did not salute him in the market-place, sandals in hand, with their " Rabbi ! Rabbi ! " Could such men understand by what authority he taught ? no more than they dared answer his questions. They that knew him, felt he had authority quite other than that claimed by the Scribes ; the authority of true words, the authority of a noble life ; yes, the authority v/hich God gives a great moral and religious man. God delegates authority to men just in proportion to their power of truth, and their power of goodness ; to their being and their life. So God spoke in Jesus, as he taught the perfect religion, anticipated, developed, but never yet transcended.