Read here

Masnavi i Ma'navi; the spiritual couplets of Maulána Jalálu-'d-Dín Muhammad Rúmi

Maulana Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī · 1898 · Scanned text · Free in the US

123,336 words · about 8 h 38 min to read

Period artwork: Interior of the Bodleian Library, 1845
About this edition

Scanned text — may contain errors · view original scans

Free in the US: this text is in the public domain in the United States; it may still be in copyright elsewhere.

Licence: PD · PD-US by publication date

Text from Internet Archive, read from page scans by OCR and set out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. How RedLectern is built

About this book

Author
Maulana Jalāl al-Dīn Rūmī
Language
English
Published
1898
Length
123,336 words · about 8 h 38 min
Sections
16 reader sections
Text
Scanned text, read from page scans by OCR; may contain errors
Rights
Public domain in the United States · PD-US by publication date

 

Contents (16)

Continue:

Front matter

TRUBNER’S

ORIENTAL SERIES

MASNAYI I MA’NAVI

BOOK I. Prologue . i

Story I. — The Prince and the Handmaid ... 4

Description of love ........ 5

Importunity of Shamsu-’d-Din of Tabriz .... 6

Story II. — The Oilman and his Parrot . 7

Confusion of saints with hypocrites .... 8

Story III. — The Jewish King and the Vazir .... 9

The VaziFs teaching . 10

Sleep of the body the soul’s awaking .11

Laila and the Khalifa . 12

The twelve volumes of theology . . 13

Story IV. — Another Tyrannical Jewish King . . • 15

Second causes subordinate to the First Cause . 1 5

Praises compared to vapour . 16

Trust in God opposed to human exertions . .18

Wisdom granted to the weak . 20

Human wisdom the manifestation of Divine .21

Story VI. — ’Omar and the Ambassador . 24

God’s agency reconciled with man’s free will . 25

Story VII. — The Merchant and his Parrot .... 28

Saints preserved from all harm . 28

The jealousy of God . 29

Complaints of God’s harsh dealings . 30

'776586

VI

Contents

PAGE

Story VIII. — The Harper . 33

Apology for applying the term “ Bride ” to God . . 33

BOOK II. Prologue . 61

Story I. — The Sufi’s Beast . .62

The poet’s doctrines veiled in fables .... 63

Why the prophets were sent . 63

Mystical meaning of “ Daylight ” . 64

Expressions of religious feeling . 65

On blind imitation ....... 66

Evil influence of covetousness . 67

Story II. — The Pauper and the Prisoners .... 68

Satan’s office in the world ...... 68

The “ Beloved ” the cause of all earthly beauty . . 70

CONTENTS.

Story III. — The King and his two Slaves The apostolical succession

Story IV. — The Falcon and the Owls

The right use of forms ....

Story V. — The Thirsty Man ....

“ It was not ye who shot ” ...

Story VI. — Luqman and his Master

Love endures hardships from the Beloved

Story VII. — Moses and the Shepherd Religious forms indifferent Why the wicked flourish ....

Story VIII.— The Man and his Pet Bear He who needs mercy finds it .

The worshippers of the golden calf .

Story IX. — The Gardener and the Three Friends

Story X. — Bdyazid and the Saint .

The sweet uses of adversity God the Author of good and evil Evil turned into good for the good .

Story XI.— Mo’avia and Ibli's

The value of sighs .

Wisdom the “ believer’s lost camel ” .

False doctrines contain some truth .

Story XII. — The Four Hindustanis

Story XIII. — The Old Man and the Physician Bad principles produce bad actions .

Story XIV. — The Carrier and the Scholar

Story XV.— The Man who Boasted

Story XVI. — The Gluttonous Sufi .

The “ mean ” is relative ....

The ecstatic state above law

The “ inner voice ” its own evidence

Story XVII. — The Tree of Life

Story XVIII. — The Young Ducks .

vii

PAGE

. 72 73

• 76

• 76

• 78

82 84

. 85

■ 87

• 96

■ 97

104 . 105

. 105

. 106

. 107

. 109 viii

CONTENTS.

f x'v

',9

Book III. Page

Story I. — The Travellers who ate the Elephant . . 1 1 1

God’s care for His children . hi

Evil deeds make prayers stink . 1 1 2

The man who cried “0 Allah !’; . .114

Story II. — The Villager and the Townsman . . . .115

Jesus healing the sick . . . . .116

God’s claims to our gratitude . 1 17

Tests of hypocrisy . 118

Story III. — The Jackal who aped a Peacock . . . .120

Story IV. — Moses and Pharaoh . 120

Lust compared to the snake . 1 2 1

Story V. — The Elephant in a dark Room . , . .122

Outward sense compared to the palm of a hand .122

Noah and his son Canaan . .124

Reconciliation of two traditions . ..124

The bewilderment of love annuls thought .125

Story VI. — The Lover and his Mistress . . .126

True lovers seek “ union ” ...... 127

Story VII.— The Man in the Time of David . .128

Knowledge opposed to opinion . 128

Story VIII. — The Boys and their Teacher .... 129

Story IX. — The Darvesh who broke his Vow . . .130

All things dependent on God’s will . . .131

Divine decrees apparent in their effects . . .131

Story X. — The Old Man and his Sons . 1 33

Story XI. — Bahlol and the Darvesh . 1 34

Story XII. — The Visions of Daquqi ..... 136

Identification of the will with God’s will . 137

All religions in substance one . . . . . 1 39

Story VII. (continued) — The Man in the l ime of David . 139

Criminals betray themselves . . . . .140

Lust compared to the murderer . . . .141

Story XIII. — The Men of Saba . 142

Not all can use parables rightly . . . 143

The arguments of the Fatalists . . . . 144

Mercy inclines the good to devotion . . . j 46

The despair of the prophets . . . .148

Probability the guide of life ...... 149

CONTENTS .

IX

PAOE

Story XIV. — The Miracles of the Prophet .150

The way of escape in difficulties . .150

Story XV. — The Language of Animals . 151

Why free will is good for man . 152

Story XVI. — The Woman who lost her Infants . 153

Knowing through similitudes and at first hand 154

Story XVII. — The Vakil of the Prince of Bokhdra 155

The lover’s reply . 157

The Vakil’s answer . 158

Love generates love . . . .160

The Vakil’s praises of the Prince . 163

The “ eye of certainty ” . 166

Affliction compared to the boiling of herbs .167

Objections of fools to the Masnavi . 168

Solomon and the gnat . 170

BOOK IV. Story I. — The Lover and his Mistress . 172

Evil only relative . 174

Why God is named “Seeing” . 175

The world compared to a bath stove .176

Story II. — The “ Most Remote ” Temple . 1 77

The microcosm and the macrocosm . 1 79

Solomon’s message to Bilqis . 180

Ibrahim bin Adham’s love for music .181

Ibrahim bin Adham abdicates his throne .182

The art of preaching . 183

Solomon’s admonitions to Bilqis . . .184

How men and demons helped to build the temple . .186

All creatures cry to God for sustenance . .188

On cleansing the heart from self-conceit . . .189

Story III. — The Youth who complained of his Food . .192

Moses and the magicians . 193

Story IV. — The Ecstatic States of Bdyazid . . .194

Bayazid’s impious sayings . 195

Why the Hudhaili youth was promoted . . 1 97

X

CONTENTS .

PAGE

Story V.— The Three Fishes . 198

The wise, the half wise, and the fool . 199

The bird’s counsels ........ 200

Story VI. — Moses and Pharaoh . 201

The tradition, “ I was a hidden treasure ”... 204

Pious men ask not where heaven and hell are . 205

Arguments of a Sunni and a Dahri . 207

Story VII. — The ungrateful Courtier . 209

Why some are made for destruction . 2 1 1

Story VIII. — The Prince beguiled by a Courtesan .212

He who grieves the Logos must expect tribulation . .214

Story IX. — The Mule and the Camel . 215

The evolution of man . 216

Zu’l Qarnain visits Mount Qdf . 218

Gabriel appears to Muhammad . 219

Address to Husamu’-d-Din . 220

BOOK V. Story I. — The Prophet and his Guest . 221

Outward acts bear witness of the thoughts . 223

Prayers for spiritual enlightenment . 225

Story II. — The Arab and his Dog . 227

Story III. — The Sage and the Peacock . 228

“ There is no monkery in Islam ” ..... 228

Prayers for higher aspirations . 230

Story IV. — The Rdfizis of Sabzawar . 232

Satan’s snares for men . . 233

Story V. — The Man who claimed to be a Prophet . . 234

The Prophet’s prayer . . . . 235

Story VI. — The Youth who imitated a Shaikh . 236

Worthlessness of blind imitation . 237

Theologians blind to things of the Spirit .... 239

Story VII. — The Creation of Adam . 241

God the “Only Real Agent” . 242

Death is gain . 243

Story VIII. — Mahmud and Aydz . 245

Description of him who is made one with God . . . 247

CONTENTS .

xi

PAGE

Story IX. — The Repentance of Nashh . 248

Men’s members will bear witness against him . .250

Story X. — The Lion, the Fox, and the Ass .250

Blind imitators exposed by their actions . . 253

Worldly illusions to be shaken off . 255

The monk’s search for a man . 257

Story XI. — The Musulman and the Magian .... 258

Love puts reason to silence . 260

Story VIII. ( continued ) — Mahmud and Ayaz ... 261

Love and faith a mighty spell . 262

God’s dealings manifest to the spiritual .... 262

Story XII. — The Devotee who broke the Wine-Jar . 265

Description of one who trusts to the light of nature . . 267

Story VIII. ( continued ) — Mahmud and Aydz .... 267

Iyazi’s rebuke to his passions . 268

Hearing leads on to seeing . .270

Those who deny the life to come . 271

“ We allot to some lusts, to others virtues” 272

BOOK VI. Prologue . 275

Man’s worth depends on the objects of his aspiration 276

Fear of men hinders acceptance of truth . 278

Prayers for guidance . 279

Story I. — The Slave who loved his Master’s Daughter . 280

Story II. — The Fowler and the Bird . 282

The bird’s cries for succour . 283

Story III. — The Turkish Amir and the Minstrel 284

Intoxication a figure of spiritual ecstasy ... 286

Reasons for knocking at the empty house 288

Story IV. — The purchase of Bilal . 289

Growth in grace gradual . 291

Story V. — The Sufi and the Qazi . 292

The dead regret not dying, but lost opportunities 294

Virtue implies trials overcome . 295

Men’s members bear witness of God’s bounty . 297

Story VI. — The Faqir and the Hidden Treasure 298

God rules men by hope and fear . 300

“ I am about to place on earth a Khalifa ” ... 300

God is “ nearer to us than our neck- vein n 302

Digitized by i^ooQle

CONTENTS.

xii

PAGE

Stort VII. — The Three Travellers . 304

Lofty speculation diverts us from God .... 305

The uses of chastisement . . 307

The mouse and the frog . 309

He who discerns God in the world is safe . . .310

Story VIII. — The Pensioner of the Prefect of Tabriz 31 1

Folly of trusting to man . 312

Joseph in the prison . 314

The significance of “ forms '5 . . . . . . 315

The Truth 55 hidden in our phenomenal being . . 317

The figurative language of the Princes . . . -319

Why the answer to prayer is delayed .... 323

The joys of “ Fruitio Dei” inexpressible .... 325

The death of the Second Prince . 328

Note on Apocryphal Supplements to the Masnavi . . . 329

THE AUTHOR'S PREFACE.

The Masnavi is thus described by its author in his Arabic preface : —

“ This is the book of the Masnavi. It contains the roots of the roots of the roots of the Faith, and treats of the mysteries of 4 Union ’ and 4 Certitude/ Thus saith the feeble slave, in need of the mercy of God, whose name be praised, Muhammad, son of Muhammad, son of Husain, of Balkh, of whom may God accept it, — ‘ I have exerted myself to enlarge this book of poetry in rhymed couplets, which contains strange and rare narratives, beautiful sayings and recondite indications; a path for the devout, and a garden for the pious; short in its expressions, but having numerous applications/ ” The author goes on to state that he wrote his book at the instance of Shaikh Hasan, son of Muhammad, 44 a chief of the Gnostics (Arif In) and a leader of right direction and of sure knowledge ; ” and concludes with a prayer that it may prove 44 a blessing to those who are possessed of insight, the godly, the spiritual, the heavenly-minded, the men of light who keep silence and observe, who are absent in spirit though present in the body, very kings though clothed in rags, true nobles among the people, endued with virtues, the lights of guidance.”

xiii

XIV

INTRODUCTION .

II. Sufism

The Masnavi is a summary of the religious senti¬ ments and doctrine of Islam as interpreted and modi¬ fied by the Muhammadan Mystics or Sufis. And, as the preface declares, it is specially addressed to Sufis, men who aimed at following the more perfect way as opposed to the moderate practice of average Muhammadans, men who professed to renounce the world and seek know¬ ledge of God and union with Him in a life of self¬ mortification and spiritual meditation. Although some Sufi tenets seem repugnant to the teaching of the Koran, nevertheless there is ample evidence to prove that the Sufis were the lineal spiritual descendants of the earliest saints of Islam, and were, in fact, what Catholics call the “ Religious ” of the Muhammadan communion. Iiaji Khalfa in his article on Sufism ( Tcisawwuf ), quotes Qushairi to the effect that, after the death of Muhammad, the most earnest adherents of the Faith were called “ Companions of the Prophet ” ( Ashcib ), their successors bore the title of “Followers” ( Tabaiyun ), and in the third generation this title was altered to that of “ Ascetics ” ( Zcihid ), or “ Devotees ” (’ Abid ). The first to bear the name “ Sufi ” (“ clad in wool ”), was one Abu Hashim, a Syrian ascetic, who died in 150 a.h. (767 a.d.). Jami, in his life of Abu Hashim, says that the first convent ( Khanqdh ) was built for the Sufis by a Christian nobleman who had remarked their love for one another. This adoption of quasi-monastic institu¬ tions seems to have been the first step taken by the Sufis beyond the pale of strict Muhammadan ordinances. The prophet had said, “There is no monkery in Islam/' but this dictum had to be ignored or explained away by the growing sect. Their increasing spiritual exalta¬ tion soon led them to adopt other modifications of

Introduction

xv ordinary Muhammadan doctrines. Thus the ordinary doctrine of resignation to the will of Allah ( Tasllm ), was soon developed into an exaggerated “ Quietism ” like that of Mme. Guyon in France. In his Tazkiratu-l- AidiycL , 'Attar gives the life of Eabi’a of Basra, a female saint of the second century of the Hijira. A conversa¬ tion took place between her and three holy men on the subject of sincerity (Sidq). One of them said, “ He is not sincere who does not patiently endure the blows of his Lord.” Eabi’a answered, “That saying smells of egotism.” Another said, “ He is not sincere in his pro¬ fessions who does not enjoy the blows of his Lord.” Eabi’a rejoined, “ I know a better saying than that : He is not sincere who does not forget the pain of the blows in his joy at beholding the face of his Lord.” Once she fell sick, and they asked her the cause of her sickness. She said, “ I dwelt upon the joys of Paradise, and therefore my Beloved has chastened me.” She added, “ Consume with fire, 0 Lord, the heart that loveth thee.” This is exactly Mme. Guyon’s senti¬ ment : —

“ Love, if tliy destined sacrifice am I,

Come, slay thy victim and prepare thy fires,

Plunged in thy depths of mercy let me die The death which every soul that lives desires.”

Eabi’a was asked if she wished to marry ; she said, “ The bonds of wedlock have descended upon me, I am not my own but my Lord’s, and must not be un¬ faithful to Him.” Hasan of Basra said to her, “ How dost thou know Him ? ” She answered, “ Thou knowest Him as such and such, I as Nonsuch.” When she made the pilgrimage and saw the KcCba , she said, “ I see only bricks and a house of stone, what do they profit me ? ’Tis Thou that I want.” This saying is, perhaps, the earliest expression of that indifference to outward forms and rites which distinguished Sufis as a class.

b

XVI

INTRODUCTION.

Another famous saint of the second century a.h. was Ibrahim bin Adham of Balkh. He is a typical example of the Sufi ascetic. Born in the purple, he renounced all the pomps and vanities of the world and became a Darvesh. One story told of his ascetic practices is that he was not content to make the pilgrimage in the ordinary way, but stopped at the end of every mile of the road to prostrate himself a thousand times. By this and similar works of supererogation he of course acquired supernatural powers. Just as St. Anthony of Padua constrained the fishes at Ravenna to listen to his preach¬ ing, Ibrahim made the fishes in the Tigris bring back a needle which he had dropped into that river. The miracles ascribed to all the chief Sufi saints, are almost exact counterparts of those of St. Francis of Assisi, and other noted Christian saints. As Rumi says, “ Love and faith are a mighty spell.” The “ Golden Legend ” is the natural outcome of the love and reverence in¬ spired by the memories of saintly lives.

By the end of the second century of the Hijira, it is clear that Sufi doctrine had come to differ in some respects from ordinary Muhammadan views, but there is good evidence to prove that the Sufis of that time were highly esteemed. According to the Tazkiratu-l- Auliyci , the great Canonist, Imam Ash-Shafi’i once visited a Sufi convent and listened to the discourse of the ^ brethren, and then gave it as his opinion that “ The knowledge (of God) possessed by the whole world did not equal his own knowledge, but that his own know¬ ledge fell short of the knowledge possessed by the Sufis.” The Imam Ahmad Hanbal, another of the great Canonists, gave similar testimony. One day his disciples said to him, “ These Sufis rest on blind faith or trust ( tawakkal ), but are devoid of knowledge.” Hanbal answered, “ Ye are mistaken, knowledge is implanted in them.” They said, “ They aspire to nothing more than a broken crust.” He replied, " I know no sect on the face of the earth

INTRODUCTION. xvii

whose aspirations are nobler than theirs, since they desire nothing of the world beyond a broken crust/’

In the third century of the Hijira, Sufi doctrines were developed, which at last brought some of the more advanced members of the sect into conflict with the ecclesiastical authorities. The earliest and most cele¬ brated of these more advanced doctrinaires was Bayazld of Bistam in Khorasan, who was descended from a Parsi (or Magian) family. He used to say that he had gained his spiritual knowledge by an empty belly and a naked body. Ibn Khalliqan records one of his sayings to the effect that it is not the performance of miracles which proves saintship, but rather a godly and righteous life. On the other hand, many of the sayings ascribed to him in the “ Lives of the Saints ” are of the most extravagant character. He would say, “ Glory be to me ! ” ( Subhdnl ), implying that he was one with the Deity. In the Masnavi, Eumi gives some specimens of these extravagant sayings, and excuses him on the ground that he was possessed by a spirit, and therefore not answerable.

It seems worth while to give some more of these hard sayings of Bayazld, because, so far as we can judge, he was the man who above all others gave to Sufi doctrine its permanent shape. The Tazkirat ul Auliya records this saying of his, “ God, most high, has laid down commands and prohibitions, and to those who obey Him He gives a robe of honour. Other men earnestly strive to gain that robe, but I desire of Him naught but Himself.” Again, “Every one is drowned in the sea of works, but I am drowned in the sea of Unification ( Tauhld ). They rely on their own righteousness, but I rely on His free bounty.” Here we find the first hint of an esoteric religion for “ interior men ” 1 {Ahl

1 “While men of externals believe be seen through a near approach to that there is nothing in existence God, and a close communion with but what is visible to sight, in- His omnipresent Spirit.” — Fasusu'l terior men hold that much is veiled Hikam. from outward sight, which can only

INTRODUCTION.

xviii

i bat-in ), as the Sufis called themselves, opposed to the exoteric religion of ordinary Mussulmans. The latter sought salvation through the works of the law (Shariat), while the Sufis followed the higher road of the truth (Haqlqat).

There was nothing singular or exceptional in the rise of an esoteric religion in Islam. The same phenomenon had been seen in Hinduism, when the theosophy of the Upanishads and the Vedanta was engrafted upon the older Hindu scriptures. And the same thing happened when the more cultivated Athenians established the Eleusinian mysteries, which aimed at presenting to the initiated or “ mystics,” as they were called, more ade¬ quate conceptions of Deity than those of the current popular religion.

Bayazld is reported to have said, “ I saw ‘ The Truth,’ most high (Al Haqq), in a dream. He said to me, ‘ What dost thou desire ? ’ I answered, ‘ I desire what Thou desirest.’ He said, ‘I am to thee as thou to Me.’” Another of his sayings was this, “ I beheld in a dream ‘ The Truth,’ most high, and I asked, 4 What is the way to Thee?’ And He said, ' Quit thyself, and thou wilt attain to Me.’ ”

Al Haqq , or “ The Truth,” the name here used by Bayazld, is one of the ninety-nine names of Allah, com¬ monly recited as ejaculations (Zikr). But in most Sufi writings it is used in preference to all the rest, presum¬ ably because it indicates a somewhat wider conception of Deity than the “ Allah ” of the Koran. It has been compared to the “Sat” of the Upanishads ( Das seiendc ), but it may well be doubted if the Sufi conception of deity ever became quite so abstract and devoid of per¬ sonal attributes as the Brahma of the Upanishads and the Vedanta.1 With the Sufis “ The Truth ” is a

1 Thus “The Truth” seems to jcdal ), which are, in fact, the goodhave always retained the attributes ness and severity, the mercy and of beauty and terror (jamcd and vengeance of the Allah of the Koran.

INTRODUCTION.

xix personality so wide as to include in itself all existence and all action, all matter and all force, but it seems to be regarded as a personality for all that. It is not difficult to understand how this idea of the all-absorbing and all-embracing nature of the Deity grew up.

As Deutsch and Eenan point out, the Koran does not clearly determine the question as to how far men are free agents, acting on their own initiative, and how far their action is constrained by Allah. In fact, it speaks in merely popular language, sometimes ascribing all action to Allah, and sometimes to men's own agency.1 But the Scholastic theologians, or Mutakallamin , were not content to leave the question in this prudent obscurity. By reasonings similar to those of St. Augus¬ tine and Calvin, they demonstrated that Allah was the only real agent {Fail i haqlql ), and that men only acted under the “ compulsion ” (jdbr) of the divine will. This extreme view seemed to glorify Allah, and exalt the idea of the divine nature, and was warmly adopted by thorough¬ going Sufis like Bayazid. Thus we find him saying, “ If to-morrow in His court He should ask me, ‘ Why hast thou not done so and so ? ’ I should prefer that to His asking, * Why hast thou done so and so ? * for whatever I do of myself is egotism, and egotism and ‘ I * are ‘ Shurk / or ascribing partners to God, which is the deadliest of sins.” A story is told of a zealous Sufi, called “MuhasibI,” from his habit of rigorous self-exami¬ nation, who refused to inherit from his father because the father had held the doctrine of man’s free will, and was therefore a blasphemer of the divine omnipotence. Shabistari, in the Gulshan i Edzt lays down in like manner that all who hold any doctrine other than :{ compulsion ” ( jdbr ), are no better than Magian dualists. It may be remarked by the way that St. Augustine, like Bayazid, had once held the dualistic view. Was

1 Canon Mozley, in his “ Angus- makes a similar remark about the tinian Doctrine of Predestination,” Bible (p. 36).

XX

INTRODUCTION.

. it a similar revulsion from this view which im¬ pelled both to such strong advocacy of the opposite principle ?

When Bayazld had become convinced that all the action in the universe is the direct action of “ The Truth,” he soon came to the further conclusion that there is no real existence in the universe save the exist¬ ence of the same “ Truth.” By the aid of allegorical interpretation, that wonderful instrument for putting new wine into old bottles, it was easy to deduce this doctrine from various texts of the Koran, c.g. “To Him we shall return,” “ All creatures shall pass away except the face of thy Lord,” &c. Consequently we find Bayazld claiming actual identity with the Deity. He said, a My similitude is as the ocean, for its depth is not seen, neither its beginning or ending.” One asked him, “ What is the empyrean ('arsli)V' He answered, “It is I.” “What is the throne of Allah?” “It is I.” “ What are the pen and the tablet ? ” He said, “ I am the pen and the tablet.” They said, “ Before God, most high, Abraham, Moses, aud Muhammad (on whom be peace and blessing), are very slaves.” He made answer, “ All these am I.” They said, “ Before God, most high, Gabriel, Michael, Israfil, and ’Azrall (on whom be peace), are very slaves.” He said, “ I am all these.” His ques¬ tioners were silent. Bayazld added, “ Of a surety he who is annihilated (viahv) in ‘ The Truth ’ attains to the very reality of all that exists.” 1 To use the words of the German mystic, Eckart, he “ breaks through to the Oneness,” and abides in “ the ground of his soul.” 2 This is the doctrine expressed in the well-known Sufi formula, “ Baqa bad vl fana” or abiding in “ The Truth ” after anni¬ hilating self.

After Bayazld, the greatest name amongst the early

1 Vaughan quotes similar rhap- ii. pp. 7 and 11. sodies from the poems of Mr. Emer- 2 See Vaughan’s account of son and the hymns of Angelus Eckart in “ Hours with the Mys- Silesius. “ Hours with the Mystics,” tics,” i. p. 146.

INTRODUCTION.

xxi

Sufis was that of Junaid of Bagdad, who, according to Jami in the Nafahcitu-l-Uns, died in 297 a.h. It is said that the mantle of ’Ali had descended to Junaid through Hasan of Basra, as an outward and visible sign of his apostolic succession. One of his sayings was this, “ The hearts of religious men are veiled by three veils ; to wit, estimation of their own works, expectation of recompense for them, and pre¬ occupation with the hope of divine favours.” They asked Junaid, “ When is a servant a true servant in his devotion ? ” He answered, “ When he sees all things under the absolute sway of God, most high, and that all come from God, and subsist in God, and return to God, as God hath said, ‘ Glory be to Him in whose hand is sway over all things, and to Him shall ye return* ” {Sum, xxxvi. 83).

Husain bin Mansur A1 Hallaj (“ the wool-carder ”) was a disciple of Junaid. His life is given by Ibn Khalliqan, * Attar, Jam!, and others. He was put to death at Bagdad in 309 a.h. for saying, “I am ‘The Truth * ” ( And ul Haqq). Imam Ghazall excuses him on the ground that he spoke in this way out of excessive love to God, and that such expressions may be likened to the following : “I am he whom I love, and he whom I love is I. We are as two souls in one body. When ye see me ye see him, and when ye see him ye see me.” But in another passage quoted in Pococke’s Specimen Historic Arabum , p. 263, he condemns the use of all such expressions. When the sentence of death was passed, Hallaj said, “ You cannot scourge me or shed my blood ; my belief is Islam based on the Sunna ; I acknowledge the pre-eminence of the Imams, the well-directed Khallfs ( i.e . the first four Khalifs), and of the rest of the Companions, may the blessing of God be upon them ; on God do I call that He protect my blood.” Shortly before he died, he cried out, “My friend is not guilty of injuring me ; he gives me to xxn

The opening of the book is shown; the full text loads in the reader.

Loading the full text…