Real ghost stories: a record of authentic apparitions.

Front matter

From a crayon portrait by'\

THE LATE EDMUND GURNEY,

Of the Psychical Research Society.

Part I.— The Ghost That Dwells In Each Of Us

" ?f^EAL GHOST STORIES !— How can there be real ghost stories when there are no real ghosts ? ''

■xM But are there no real ghosts ? You may not have seen one, but it does not follow that theref;,-e they do not exist. How many of us have seen the microbe that kills? There are at least as many persons who testify they have seen apparitions as there are men of science who have examined the microbe. You and I, who have seen neither, must perforce take the testimony of others. The evidence for the microbe may be conclusive, the evidence as to apparitions may be worthless ; but in both cases it is a case of testimony, not of personal experience.

The first thing to be done, therefore, is to collect testimony, and by way of generally widening the mind and shaking down the walls of prejudice which lead so many to refuse to admit the clearest possible evidence as to facts which have not occurred within their personal experience, I preface the report of my "Census of Halhacinations " by a preliminary chapter on the perplexing subject of " Personality." This is the question that lies at the root of all the controversy as to ghosts. Before disputing about whether or not there are ghosts outside of us, let us face the preliminary question, whether we have not each of us a veritable ghost within our own skin ?

THE GHOST THAT DWELLS IN EACH OF US.

Thrilling as are some of the stories of the apparitions of the living and the dead, they are less sensational than the suggestion recently made by hypnotists and psychical researchers of England and France, that each of us has a ghost inside him. They say that we are all haunted by a Spiritual Presence, of whose existence we are only fitfully and sometimes never conscious, but which nevertheless inhabits the innermost recesses of our personality. The theory of these researchers is that besides the body and the mind, meaning by the mind the conscious personality, there is also within our material frame the soul or unconscious personaHty, the nature of which is shrouded in unfathomable mystery. The latest word of advanced science has thus landed us back to the apostolic assertion that man is composed of body, soul, and spirit ; and there are some who see in the scientific doctrine of the unconscious personality a welcome confirmation from an unexpected quaiter of the existence of the soul.

The fairy tales of science are innumerable, and, like the fairy tales of old romance, they are not lacking in the grim, the tragic, and even the horrible. Of recent years nothing has so fascinated the imagination even of the least imaginative of men as the theory of disease which transforms every drop of blood in our bodies into the lists in which phagocyte and microbe wage the mortal strife on which our health depends. Every white corpuscle that swims in our veins is now declared to be the armed Knight of Life for ever on the look-out for the Microbe fiend of death. Day and night, sleeping and waKmg, the white knights of fife are constantly on the alert, for on their vigilance hangs our existence. Sometimes, however, the invading microbes come in, not in companies but in platoons, innumerable as Xerxes' Persians, and then ■" e'en Roderick's best are backward borne," and we die. For our life is the prize of the combat in these novel lists which Science has revealed to our view through the microscope, and health is but the token of the triumphant victory of the Phagocyte over the Microbe.

But far more enthralling is the suggestion which psychical science has made as to the existence of a combat not less grave in the very inmost centre of our own mental or spiritual existence. The strife between the infinitely minute bacilli that swarm in our blood has only the interest which attaches to the conflict of inarticulate and apparently unconscious animalculse. But the strife to which recent researches into the nature and constitution of our mental processes call attention concerns our conscious selves. It suggests almost inconceivable possibilities as to our own nature, and leaves us appalled on the brink of a new World of being of which until recently most of us were unaware.

There are no papers of such absorbing interest in the whole of the " Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research " as those which deal with the question of the Personality of Man. " I," what am I P What is our Ego ? Is this conscious personality which receives impressions through the five senses, and through them alone, is it the only dweller in this mortal tabernacle ? May there not be other personalities, or at least one other that is not conscious, when we are awake, and alert, and about, but which comes into semi-consciousness when we sleep, and can be developed into complete consciousness when the other personality is thrown into a state of hypnotic trance ? In other words, am I one personality or two ? Is my nature dual? As I have two hemispheres in my brain, have I two minds or two souls ?

The question will, no doubt, appear fantastic in its absurdity to those who hear it asked for the first time ; but those who are at all familiar with the mysterious but undisputed phenomena of hypnotism will reaUse how naturally this question arises, and how difficult it is to answer it otherwise than in the aSirmative. Every one knows Mr. Louis S 3venson's wonderful story of "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." The dual nature of man, the warfare between this body of sin and death, and the spiritual asj)irations of the soul, forms part of the common stock of our orthodox belief. But the facts which recent researches have brought to light seem to point not to the old theological doctrine of the conflict between good and evil in one soul, but to the existence in each of us of at least two distinct selfs, two personalities, standing tO'

Real Ghost Stories.

each other somewhat in the relation of man and wife, according to the old ideal when the man is everything and the woman is almost entirely suppressed.

Every one is familiar with the phenomenon of occasional loss of memory. Men are constantly losing consciousness, from disease, violence, or violent emotion, and emerging again into active life with a gap in their memory. Nay, every night we become unconscious in sleep, and rarely, if ever, remember an3rthing that we think of during slumber. Sometimes in rare cases there is a distinct memory of all that passes in the sleeping and the waking states, and we have read of one young man whose sleeping consciousness was so continuous that he led to all intents and purposes two lives. When he slept he resumed his dream existence at the point when he waked, just as we resume our consciousness at the point when we fall asleep. It was just as real to him as the life which he hved when awake. It was actual, progressive, continuous, but entirely difierent, holding no relation whatever to his waking life. Of his two existences he preferred fthat which was spent in sleep, as more vivid, more varied, and more pleasurable. This was no doubt an extreme and very unusual case. But it is not impossible to conceive the possibiUty of a continuous series of connected dreams, which would result in giving us a realising sense of leading two existences. That we fail to realise this now is due to the fact that our memory is practically inert or non-existent during sleep. The part of our mind which dreams seldom registers its impressions in regions to which on waking our conscious personality has access.

The conception of a dual or even a multiple personality is worked out in a series of papers by Mr. F. W H. Myers, to which I refer all those who wish to make a serious study of this novel and startling hypothesis. But I may at least attempt to explain the theory, and to give some outUne of the evidence on which it is based.

If I were free to use the simplest illustration without any pretence at scientific exactitude, I should say that the new theory supposes that there are inside each of us not one personality but two, and that these two correspond to the husband and wife. There is the Conscious Personality, which stands for the husband. It is vigorous, alert, active, positive, monopolising all the means of communication and production. So intense is its consciousness that it ignores the very existence of its partner, excepting as a mere appendage and convenience to itself. Then there is the Unconscious Personality, which corresponds to the wife who keeps cupboard and storehouse, and the old stocking which treasures up the accumulated wealth of impressions acqbired by the conscious personahty, but who is never able to assert any right to anything, or to the use of sense or limb except when her lord and master is asleep or entranced. When the Conscious Personality has acquired any habit or faculty so completely that it becomes instinctive, it is handed on to the Unconscious Personality to keep and use, the conscious Ego giving it no longer any attention. Deprived, like the wife in countries where the subjection of woman is the universal law, of all right to an independent existence, or to the use of the senses, or of the limbs, the Unconscious Personality has discovered ways and means of communicating other than through the recognised organs of sense. How vast and powerful are those hidden organs of the Unconscious Personality we can only dimly see. It is through them that Divine revelation is vouchsafed to man. The visions of the mystic, the prophecies of the seer, the inspiration of the sibyl, all come through this

Unconscious Soul. It is through this dumb and suppressed Ego that we communicate by telepathy, — that thought is transferred without using the five senses. This under-soul is in touch with the over-soul, which, in Emerson's noble phrase, " aboUshes time and space.'' " This influence of the senses has," he says, " in most men, overpowered their mind to that degree that the walls of time and space have come to look real and insurmountable ; and to speak with levity of these limits is in the world the sign of insanity. Yet time and space are but inverse measures of the force of the soul." It is this unconscious personality which sees the Strathmore foundering in mid-ocean, which hears a whisper spoken hundreds of miles ofl:' upon the battlefield, and which witnesses, as if it happened before the eyes, a tragedy occurring at th& Antipodes. In proportion as the active, domineering Conscious Personality extinguishes his submissive unconscious partner, materialism flourishes, and man becomes blind to the Divinity that underlies all things. Hence in all religions the first step is to silence the noisy, busthng master of our earthly tabernacle, who,, having monopolised the five senses, will hsten to no voice which it cannot hear, and to allow the silent mistress to be open-souled to God. Hence the stress which all spiritual religions have laid upon contemplation, upon prayer and fasting. Whether it is an Indian yogi, or a Trappist monk, or one of our own Quakers, it is jul the same. In the words of the Revivalist hymn, " We must lay our deadly doing down," and in receptive silence wait for the inspiration from on high. The Conscious Personality has usurped the visible world ; butthelnvisible, with its immeasurable expanse, is the domain of the Sub-conscious. Hence we read in the Scriptures of losing, life that we may find it ; for things of time and sense are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.

It is extraordinary how close is the analogy when we come to work it out. The impressions stored up by the Conscious Personality and entrusted to the care of the Unconscious are often, much to our disgust, not forthcoming when wanted. It is as if we had given a memorandum to our wife and we could not discover where she had put it. But night comes ; our Conscious Self sleeps, our Unconscious housewife wakes, and turning; over her stores produces the missing impression ; and when our other self wakes it finds the mislaid memorandum, so to speak, ready to its hand. Sometimes, as in the case of somnambulism, the Sub-conscious I'ersonality stealthily endeavours to use the body and limbs, from all direct control over which it is shut out as absolutely as the inmate of a Hindu zenana is forbidden to mount the charger of her warrior spouse. But it is only when the Conscious Personality is thrown into a state of hypnotic trance that the Unconscious Personality is emancipated from the marital despotism of her partner. Then for the first time she is allowed to help herself to the faculties and senses usually monopolised by the Conscious Self. But like the timid and submissive inmate of the zenana suddenly deii\-ered from the thraldom of her life-long partner, she immediately falls under the control of another. The Conscious Personality of another person exercises over her the same supreme authority that her own Conscious Personality did formerly ; just as some assert of women that if they were to receive the franchise they would become the mere .tools of the priests. There is nothing of sex in the ordinary material sense about the two personalities. But their union is so close as to suggest that the intrusion of the hypnotist is equivalent to an intrigue with a married woman. The Sub-conscious Personality is no longer faithful exclusively to its natural partner ; it is under the control

The Ghost that Dwells in Each of Us.

of the Conscious Personality of another ; and in the latter case the dictator seems to be irresistibly over-riding for a time all the efforts of the Conscious Personality to recover its authority in its own domain.

What proof, it will be asked impatiently, is there for the splitting of cm: personality ? The question is a just one, and I proceed to answer it.

There are often to be found in the records of lunatic asylums strange instances of a dual personality, in which there appear to be two minds in one body, as there are sometimes two yolks in one egg.

The French psychologists who write in the Revue des Deux Mondes, furnish us from time to time with very extraordinary illustrations of the dual consciousness. Only last month M. Jules Janet records the foUo^ving experiment which, although simplicity itself, gives us a very vivid gliiiipse of a most appalling complex problem : —

An hysterical subject with an insensitive limb is put to sleep, and is told, " After you wake you will raise your finger when you mean Yes, and you will put it down when you mean No, in answer to the questions which I shall ask you." The subject is then wakened, and M.

Janet pricks the insensitive limb in several places. He abks, " Do yon feel anything ? " The consciousawakened person replies with the lips, " No," but at the same time, in accordance with the signal that has been agreed upon during the state of hypnctisation, the finger is raised to signi*^y " Yes."

It has been found that the finger will even indicate exactly the number of times that the apparently insensitive limb has been wounded.

THE DOUBLE-SOTTLED IRISHMAN.

Dr. Robinson, of Lewisham, who has bestowed much attention on this subject, sends me the following delightful story about an Irishman who seems to have incarnated the Irish nationality in his own unhappy person : — ■

An old colleague of mine at the Darlington Hospital told me that he once had an Irish lunatic under his care wiio imagined that his body was the dwelling-place of two individuals, one of whom was a Catholic, with Nationalist — not to say Fenian — proclivities, and the other was a Protestant and an Orangeman. The host of these iDcompatibles said he made it a fixed rule that the ProtestanC should occupy the right side of his body and the Catholic the left, " so that he would not be annoyed wid them quarrelling in his inside." The sympathies of the host were with the green and against the orange, and he triad to weaken the latter by starving him, and for months would only chew his food on the left side of his mouth. The lunatic was not very troublesome, as a rule, but the attendants generally had to straight-waistcoat him on certain critical days — such as St. Patrick's Day and the anniversary of the battle of the Boyne ; because the Orange fist would punch the Fenian head unmercifully, and occasionally he and the Fenian leagued together against the- Orangeman and banged him against the wall. This lunatic, when questioned, said he did his best to keep the peace between his troublesome guests, but that sometimes they got out of hand.

It is seldom that we come across so remarkable an instance of alternating consciousness as that of which Professor Barrett* gives particulars, relating to a vicar's son in the North of London. This young man, after a severe illness^ seemed suddenly to cease to be one person and to become two. He led two alternating existences. In one he was natural, recognised his friends and relatives, and lived what we should regard as a normal existence. When in the other state, although to outward appearance the same, he was in mind altogether different. He did not know his parents, he had no memory of his past, he called himself by a different name, and, what is

still more remarkable, he developed musical talent, of which he had never before shown a trace. He was for all practical purposes two persons in one skin, and they alternated with each other until he died.

ANSEL BOURNE AND A. J, BROWN.

A similar case, although not so violent or chronic in its manifestation, is recorded in Vol. VII, (Part xix.) of the Psychical E«- search Society's Proceedings, as having occurred on

PEOF. W. F. BARRETT Of the Psychical Besearch Society.

* Here I may venture to explain to those who do not know who or what the Society for Psychical Research really is, that this excellent and useful association was founded in 1882 for the purpose of examining that large group of debateable phenomena designated as mesmeric psychical, and spiritualistic.

It had its birth in a conference convened by Professor Barrett, held in London January 6th, 1882. It has prosecuted its inquiries ever since into the following principal departments of work : — 1. An examination of the nature and extent of any influence wliicli. mny be exerted by one mind upon another, otherwise than through the recognised sensory channels. 2. The study of hypnotism and mesmetism ; and an Inquiry into the alleged phenomena of clairvoyance.

.3. An inquiry as to the existence of relations, hitherto unrecognised by science, between living organisms and magnetic and electric forces, and also between living and inanimate bodies.

4. A careful investigation of any reports, resting on strong testimony^ of apparitions occurring at the moment of death or otherwise, and 01 disturbances in houses reputed to be haunted.

.5. An inquiry into various alleged physical phenomena commonlycalled " spiritualistic."

6. The collection and collation of existing materials bearmg on tlie history of these subjects.

Its President is Professor Henry Sidgwick, Trinity College, Cambridge; its Hon. Secretaries, Mr. F W. H. Myers, Leckhampton House, Cambridge, and Mr. Frank Podmore, 32,. Well Walk, Hampstead, N.W. Its offices are 19, Buckingham Street, Strand, W.C.

Real Ghost Stories.

Rhode Island about four years ago. An excellent citizen, and a very religious lay preacher, of the name of Ansel Bourne, was the subject : —

On January 17th, 1887, he went from his home in Coventry, R I to Providence, in order to get money to pay for a farm winch he had arranged to buy, leaving his horse at Greene Station, in a stable, expecting to return the same afternoon from the city. He drew out of bank 551 dols., and paid several small bills, after which he went to his nephew's store, 121 Broad Street, and then started to go to his sister s house on Westminster Street. This was the last that was known of his doings at that time. He did not appear at his sisters house, and did not return to Greene.

Nothing was heard of him until March the 14th, when a telegram came from a doctor in Norristown, Philadelphia, stating that he had just been discovered there. He was entirely unconscious of having been absent from home, or of the lapse of time between January 17th and March 14th. He was brought home by his relatives, who by diligent inquiry were able to make out that Mr. Ansel Bourne, five weeks after leaving Rhode Island, opened a shop in Norristown, and stocked it with toys and confectionery, which he purchased in Philadelphia. He called himself A- J. Brown, and lived and did business, and went to meeting, like any ordinary mortal, giving no one any suspicion that he was any other than A.J. Brown.

On the morning of Monday, March lith. about five o'clock, he heard, he says, an explosion like the report of a gun or a pistol, and, waking, he noticed that there was a ridge in his bed not like the bed he had been accustomed to sleep in. He noticed the electric light opposite his windows. He rose and pulled away the curtains and looked out or the street. He felt very weak, and thought that he had been drugged. His next sensation was that of fear, knowing that he was in a place where he had no business to be. He feared arrest as a burglar, or possibly injury. He says this is the only time in his life he ever feared a policeman.

The last thing he could remember before waking was seeing the Adams express waggons at the corner of Dorrance and Broad Streets, in Providence, on his way from the store of his nephew in Broad Street to his sister's residence in Westminster Street, on January 17th.

The memory of AnselBourne retained absolutely nothing of the doings of A. J. Brown, whose life he had lived for nearly two months. Last year Professor William James hypnotised him, and no sooner was he put into the trant e and was told to remember what happened January 17th, 1^87, than he became A. J. Brown again, and gave a clear and connected narrative of all his doings in the Brown state. He did not remember ever having met Ansel Bourne. Everything, however, in his past life, he said, was " mixed up." He only remembered that he was confused, wanted to get somewhere and have rest. He did not remember how he left Norristown. His mind was confused, and since then it was a blank. He had no memory whatever of his name or of his second marriage and the place of his birth. He remembered, however, the date of his birth, and of his first wife's death, and his trade. But between January 17th, 1887, and March 14th he was not himself but another, and that other one Albert J. Brown, who ceased to exist consciously on March 14th, but who promptly returned four years afterwards, when Ansel Bourne was hypnotised, and showed that he remembered perfectly all that happened to him between these two dates. The confusion of his two memories in his earlier life is puzzling, but it in no way impairs the value of this illustration of the existence of two independent memories — two selfs, so to speak, within a single skin.

The phenomenon is not uncommon, especially with •epileptic patients. Every mad-doctor knows cases in which there are what may be described as alternating consciousnesses with alternating memories. But the experiments of the French hypnotists carry us much further. In their hands this Sub-conscious Personality is capable of development, of tuition, and of emancipation. In this little suspected region lies a great resource. For when the Conscious Personality is hopeless, diseased, or demoralised the Unconscious Personality can be employed to renovate and restore the patient, and then when its work is done it can become unconscious once more and practically cease to exist.

LOUIS V AND HIS TWO SO0LS.

There is at present a patient in France whose case is so extraordinary that I cannot do better than transcribe the report of it here, especially because it tends to shpw not only that we have two personalities, but that each may use by preference a separate lobe of the brain. The Conscious Personality occupies the left and controls the right hand, the Unconscious the right side of the head and controls the left hand. It also brings to light a very curious not to say appalling fact, viz. the immense moral difierence there may be between the conscious and the unconscious personalities. In the American case Bourne was a character practically identical with Brown. In this French case the character of each self is entirely difiierent. What makes the case still more interesting is that, besides the two personaUties which we aU seem to possess, this patient had an arrested personaUty, which was only fourteen years old when the age of his body was over forty. Here is the story, however, make of it what you will.

Louis V began life (in 18G3) as the neglected child of a

turbulent mother. He was sent to a reformatory at ten years of age, and there showed himself, as he has always done when his organisation had given him a chance, quiet, wellbehaved, and obedient. Then at fourteen years old he had a great fright from a viper — a friglit which threw him off his balance and started the series of psychical oscillations on which he has been tossed ever since. At first the symptoms were only physical, epilepsy and hysterical paralysis of the legs; and at the asylum of Bonne val, whither he was next sent, he worked at tailoring steadily for a couple of months. Then suddenly he had a hystero-epileptio attack — fifty hours of convulsions and ecstasy — and when he awoke from it he was no longer paralysed, no longer acquainted with tailoiing, and no longer virtuous. His memory was set bacL, so to say, to the moment of the viper's appearance, and he could remember nothing since. His character had become violent, greedy, quarrelsome, and his tastes were radicallj ohanged. For instance, though he had before the attack been a total abstainer, he now not only drank his own wine, but stole the wine of the other patients. He escaped from Bonneval, and after a few turbulent years, tracked by his occasional relapses into hospital or madhouse, he turned up once more at the Rochefort asylum in the character of a private of marines, convicted of theft, but considered to be of unsound mind. And at Rochefort and La Rochelle, by great good fortune, he fell into the hands of three physicians — Professors Bourru and Burot, and Dr. Mabille— able and willing to continue and extend the observations which Dr. Camuset at Bonneval, and Dr. Jules Voisin at Bicetre, had already made on this most precious of mauvais svjets at earlier points in his chequered career.

He is now no longer at Rochefort, and Dr. Burot informs me that his health has much improved, and that his peculiarities have in great part disappeared. I must however, for clearness saVe, use the present tense in briefly describing his condition at the time when the long series of experiments were made.

The state into which he has gravitated is a very unpleasing one. There is paralysis and insensibility of the right side, and, as is often the case in right hemiplegia, the speech is indistinct and diflScult. Nevertheless he is constantly

The Ghost that Dwells in Each of Us.

haranguing any one who will listen to him, abusing his physicians, or preaching — -with a monkey-like impudence rather than with reasoned clearness — radicalism in politics and atheism in religion. He makes bad jokes, and if any one pleases him he endeavours to caress him. He remembers recent events during his residence at Rochefort asylum, but only two scraps of his life before that date, namely, his vicious period at Bonneval and a part of his stay at Bicetre.

Except this strange fragmentary memory, there is nothing very unusual in this condition, and in many asylums no experiments on it would have been attempted. Fortunately the physicians at Rochefort were familiar with the efficacy of the contact of metals in provoking transfer of hysterical hemiplegia from one side to the other. They tried various

metals in turn on Louis V . Lead, silver, and zinc had no

efEect. Copper produced a slight return of sensibility in the paralysed arm, but steel applied to the right arm transferred the whole insensibility to the left side of the body.

Inexplicable as such a phenomenon is, it is sufficiently common, as French physicians hold, in hysterical cases to excite little surprise. What puzzled the doctors was the change of character which accompanied the change of

sensibility. When Louis V issued from the crisis of

transfer, with its minute of anxious expression and panting breath, he might fairly be called a new man. The restless insolence, the savage impulsiveness, have wholly disappeared. The patient is now gentle, respectful, and modest, can speak clearly now, but he only speaks when he is spoken to. If he is asked his views on religion and politics he prefers to leave such matters to wiser heads than his own. It might seem that morally and mentally the patient's cure had been complete.