Read here

Pharmacologia Fourth American, from the Seventh London Edition

Paris, John Ayrton · Public domain text

287,550 words · about 20 h 8 min to read

About this edition

The text of Pharmacologia Fourth American, from the Seventh London Edition comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #62958. It is public domain in the United States. Project Gutenberg’s header and license text are removed, and RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This text-only edition leaves out 4 illustrations. See the illustrated edition at Project Gutenberg.

This book is long enough to be split into 5 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Author
John Ayrton Paris (1785–1856)
Language
English
Subjects
Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy
Length
287,550 words · about 20 h 8 min
Sections
5 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (5)

The opening of Preface

The Public are already in possession of many pharmaceutical compendiums and epitomes of plausible pretensions, composed with the view of directing the practice of the junior, and of relieving the occasional embarrassments of the more experienced practitioner. Nothing is farther from my intention than to disparage their several merits, or to question their claims to professional utility; but in truth and justice it must be confessed that, as far as these works relate to the art of composing scientific prescriptions, their authors have not escaped the too common error of supposing that the reader is already grounded in the first principles of the science; or, to borrow the figurative illustration of a popular writer, that while they are in the ship of science, they forget the disciple cannot arrive without a boat. I am not acquainted with any book that is calculated to furnish such assistance, or which professes to teach the GRAMMAR, and ground-work of this important branch of medical knowledge. Numerous are the works which present us with the detail, but no one with the philosophy of the subject.

Read on in Part 2 →