Read here

On Growth and Form

D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson · Public domain text

273,118 words · about 19 h 8 min to read

Cover of On Growth and Form

Text only · 409 illustrations omitted. Illustrated source.

About this edition

The text of On Growth and Form comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #55264. It is in English and public domain in the United States. RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This text-only edition leaves out 409 illustrations. See the illustrated edition at Project Gutenberg.

This book is long enough to be split into 9 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Cover of On Growth and Form

From Wikipedia

On Growth and Form is a book by the Scottish mathematical biologist D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson (1860–1948). The book is 793 pages in the first edition of 1917, 1116 pages in the second edition of 1942.

Excerpt from the Wikipedia article “On Growth and Form” (revision 1366957574), licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Not written by RedLectern.

Author
D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson (1860–1948)
Language
English
Subjects
Morphology (Animals), Growth
Length
273,118 words · about 19 h 8 min
Sections
19 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (19)

The opening of I. INTRODUCTORY

Of the chemistry of his day and generation, Kant declared that it was “a science, but not science,”—“eine Wissenschaft, aber nicht Wissenschaft”; for that the criterion of physical science lay in its relation to mathematics. And a hundred years later Du Bois Reymond, profound student of the many sciences on which physiology is based, recalled and reiterated the old saying, declaring that chemistry would only reach the rank of science, in the high and strict sense, when it should be found possible to explain chemical reactions in the light of their causal relation to the velocities, tensions and conditions of equilibrium of the component molecules; that, in short, the chemistry of the future must deal with molecular mechanics, by the methods and in the strict language of mathematics, as the astronomy of Newton and Laplace dealt with the stars in their courses. We know how great a step has been made towards this distant and once hopeless goal, as Kant defined it, since van’t Hoff laid the firm foundations of a mathematical chemistry, and earned his proud epitaph, Physicam chemiae adiunxit[1].

Read on in Part 1 →