Read here

Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John With an Historical Introduction

William Sharp McKechnie · Public domain text

217,506 words · about 15 h 14 min to read

Cover of Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John With an Historical Introduction
About this edition

The text of Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John With an Historical Introduction comes from Project Gutenberg e-text #65363. It is in English and public domain in the United States. Project Gutenberg’s header and license text are removed, and RedLectern sets the text out for reading on screen; no words of the book are rewritten or summarized. More formats (EPUB, Kindle) · How RedLectern is built

This book is long enough to be split into 5 parts, so each one loads quickly on its own.

About this book

Author
William Sharp McKechnie (1863–1930)
Language
English
Subjects
Law › England › History, Magna Carta, Constitutional history › England › Sources, Law › England › Sources
Length
217,506 words · about 15 h 14 min
Sections
13 reader sections · Table of contents
Contents (13)

The opening of Preface

No Commentary upon Magna Carta has hitherto been written from the standpoint of modern research. No serious attempt has yet been made to supersede, or even adequately to supplement, the works of Coke and Richard Thomson, published respectively in 1642 and 1829, and now hopelessly out of date. This lack of enterprise may be due in part to a natural reluctance to undertake so laborious a task, but seems also to suggest tacit acquiescence in the opinion of Bishop Stubbs that no separate commentary is required, since “the whole of the constitutional history of England is little more than a commentary on Magna Carta.” Yet, for that very reason the Great Charter is surely worthy to be made the subject of special and detailed study, since few documents can compete with it in the variety and interest of its contents, in the vividness of its historical setting, or in the influence it has exercised on the struggle for constitutional liberty. That this conspicuous gap in our historical and legal literature should have remained so long unfilled is the more remarkable in view of the great advance, amounting almost to a revolution, which has been effected since Coke and Thomson wrote.

Read on in Part 1 →