XXX. II. MEDULLOSEAE…

XXX. II. MEDULLOSEAE

The term Medulloseae was first employed by Goeppert and Stenzel[236] for a family of Palaeozoic plants that appears to have reached its maximum development in the Permian period: the oldest representatives so far discovered are of Upper Carboniferous age. Our knowledge of the family is chiefly derived from a study of the anatomical characters of stems, and it is therefore on this basis that any grouping of genera or species should be attempted. Although there is little information with regard to the reproductive organs of Medullosa, the type-genus, it is certain that the Medulloseae are Pteridosperms differing from members of that group included in the Lyginopterideae in the presence of more than one stele in the stem, in the habit of the fronds, and in the structure of the rachis, as also in the structure of the seeds, though these organs bear a fairly close resemblance to the seeds of Lyginopteris and Heterangium. The fronds of the Lyginopterideae are of the Sphenopteris type while in the case of such species of Medullosa as afford evidence of connexion between stems and leaves the latter have the characters of Neuropteris, Alethopteris, Odontopteris, Linopteris, and other form-genera usually included in the Neuropterideae. Dr Lotsy[237] speaks of Lyginopteris and Heterangium as members of the Sphenopteridophylla and assigns species of Medullosa either to the Neuropteridophylla or to the Pecopteridophylla, the latter subdivision including species with fronds of the Alethopteris type. There is, however, little doubt that other forms of leaves, such as Odontopteris and possibly Taeniopteris, were borne on Medullosan stems. It is undesirable except in the absence of more trustworthy criteria to make use of so protean a feature as leaf-form as a basis of classification. The name Neuropterideae has been frequently employed for Pteridosperms other than the Lyginopterideae on the ground that the foliage of Medullosa is represented by species assigned to form-genera included in the Neuropterideae. It is, however, preferable to restrict the family-name Neuropterideae to fronds and to speak of the second family of Pteridosperms as the Medulloseae, including the genera Medullosa, Sutcliffia, and Rhexoxylon.

=MEDULLOSA.=

Some species of Medullosa probably resembled in habit Angiopteris evecta and the larger Marattias; they had short and relatively thick stems clothed with the large decurrent bases of long compound fronds superficially like those of some recent Ferns and the leaves of the Cycad Bowenia. It is probable that, as Zeiller[238] has pointed out, the fronds of Medullosa and of other Pteridosperms had a greater tendency than those of true Ferns to a dichotomy of the rachis. In other types the stems reached a considerable length and leaves and branches were separated by several feet of bare stem. The large size of the leaf-stalks in proportion to the diameter of the stem as shown by such species as Medullosa anglica and M. Leuckarti (fig. 416) suggests either a short and thick main axis or, in the case of long stems bearing scattered leaves, a plant that supported itself partially at least by a habit of growth comparable with that of tropical Aroids or other lianes. While Medullosa anglica with its contiguous leaf-bases affords an example of the first type, the occurrence of stems of a Permian species, M. stellata, 3½ metres long without branches or leaf-scars, suggests the habit of a liane; similarly a specimen of Medullosa Leuckarti in the Chemnitz Museum bearing a few spreading petioles but little narrower than the stem and given off at a wide angle would seem to favour the view that some species were ill adapted to be mechanically self-supporting plants. The longest piece of stem that has come under my notice is a specimen of M. stellata in the Chemnitz Museum reaching a length of nearly 8 metres: some species attained a diameter of about 50 centimetres.

Medullosa is always polystelic: the plan of the vascular system varies considerably as regards both the number and form of the steles, but there is a uniform type of structure within the limits of each stele that recalls the single stele of Heterangium. The steles consist of a central region composed of primary xylem, originally surrounded by phloem, which in its mesarch or exarch structure agrees with the vascular tissue of some species of Gleichenia or Lygodium. To this central region a cambium added secondary xylem and phloem either in the form of a cylinder of uniform breadth, or more frequently the centrifugally developed xylem exceeded in amount the secondary conducting tissue added to the inner side of the primary region. Apart from anatomical details a Medullosan stem with its several steles, each with secondary tissue, embedded in parenchymatous ground-tissue resembles the stems of some Dicotyledonous climbers such as Thinouia scandens, species of Serjania and Paullinia[239].

Anatomically the main features of the stelar system of Medullosa, neglecting the secondary xylem and phloem, are in closer agreement with the stems of Ferns than with those of any other plants. It has been shown that the genus Heterangium bears a close resemblance to Gleichenia in the structure of the primary stele (fig. 418, C): one of the oldest types of Medullosa, M. anglica, may be described as a Heterangium with three steles and may be compared with a dictyostelic Fern in which the irregular vascular framework is made up of three main strands. In certain types of Medullosa (fig. 416) the ground-plan of the vascular system recalls that of a solenostelic Fern, while in others the greater complexity suggests comparison with such Ferns as Matonia, Angiopteris, Psaronius, or Cyathea; ‘it is as though Nature were at the Carboniferous moment in the midst of a series of amazing engineering experiments, most of which were either buried deep in Palaeozoic oblivion, or permitted to survive only as vestigial relics and atavistic ghosts’[240]. Though many Medullosae resemble Ferns there is an important difference between the two groups in the origin of the various plans of Medullosan stelar systems: in Ferns the leaf is the determining factor in the evolution of stelar arrangement, while in Medullosa the occasional interruption of a solenostele or the development of an apparently complex dictyostele are features independent of the leaf and leaf-traces. In the structure of the secondary xylem and phloem and in root-structure Medullosa agrees with recent Cycads. The genus is in short a generalised type with filicinean and cycadean affinities. In the possession of seeds borne on modified pinnae of compound fronds, Medullosa resembles both Cycas and the Lyginopterideae. The seeds exhibit a fairly close agreement with those of Lyginopteris, Heterangium and recent Cycads, but they appear to have advanced further towards the cycadean type than is the case with the closely related seeds of the Lyginopterideae. The microsporophylls are very imperfectly known but they were undoubtedly much less advanced and more fern-like than the megasporophylls.

The genus Medullosa is recorded from the Permian strata of Saxony, France, and Bohemia[241]; also from the Coal Measures of England, and the discovery of petrified petioles of Myeloxylon, the type borne on Medullosan stems in European species, may be taken as evidence of the existence of the genus in North America during the Carboniferous period[242].

The name Medullosa was applied by Cotta[243] to three types, Medullosa elegans, M. stellata, and M. porosa, from the Rothliegende of the Chemnitz district. The first of these was recognised by Brongniart[244] as a distinct genus for which he proposed the designation Myeloxylon and this was afterwards identified by Renault, Williamson, and other palaeobotanists as a petiole and not a stem. Further reference is made to Myeloxylon on a later page. Cotta spoke of Medullosa as the most puzzling of the genera dealt with in his ‘Dendrolithen,’ and in spite of the many additions to our knowledge the position of this Palaeozoic genus is still a fertile source of speculation. The generic designation Medullosa is applied to stems, with or without petioles; petioles or rachises of fronds that frequently occur apart from stems are referred to the genus Myeloxylon. The leaves of Medullosa include several well-known species of Carboniferous and Permian genera such as Alethopteris, Neuropteris and others that have in recent years been transferred from the Filicales to the Pteridosperms. In a few instances seeds have been found in organic connexion with Medullosan foliage, and there can be no reasonable doubt that Trigonocarpus, some forms of Rhabdocarpus, Pachytesta, and other seeds represent the integumented megasporangia of Medullosa or some closely allied genus.

Before attempting to summarise the salient features of Medullosa a description of a few selected types will serve to place us in a better position to consider the genus as a whole. The British species are placed first on the ground that they are both geologically the oldest though, historically, the most recently described, representatives of the genus; and in the organisation of the stem they are simpler than the continental species. Their resemblance to Heterangium serves to some extent to bridge the gap between the majority of species of Medullosa and the simpler types of Pteridosperms represented by Heterangium and Lyginopteris.

Medullosa anglica Scott[245].

Prior to the discovery of this species the genus Medullosa had not been recorded from Britain. A section in the Williamson collection recognised by Scott as that of a Medullosa had been identified by Williamson as a large Heterangium stem. An undescribed specimen was found by Arber[246] in the Binney collection at Cambridge which afforded some additional information as to the structure of the roots.

The specimens on which Scott’s thorough description is based were obtained by Messrs Wilde and Lomax from the Lower Coal Measures of Lancashire. The stem of this oldest species has the habit of a tree-fern and is almost completely invested by the stout decurrent bases of the petioles of large spirally disposed compound fronds with a phyllotaxis of ⅖, the leaves of the same orthostichy being separated from one another by a vertical distance of approximately 10 cm.

A transverse section of a slightly flattened stem is shown in fig. 416, A, the bases of three petioles give to it an angular form. Its dimensions are approximately 10 × 4 cm. The ground-tissue of two of the petioles is continuous with that of the stem, while that of the third leaf-stalk is cut through near its separation from the stem and its adaxial face is already defined by a hypodermal band of stereome, d. The surface of the stem is characterised by fine longitudinal ribs caused by the slightly projecting stereome in the outer cortex, and from the narrow furrows between the leaf-bases adventitious roots emerge in vertical series. The position of an interfoliar furrow is shown by a small arrow in fig. 416, A. There are three steles, 2–3 cm. × 6–10 mm. in diameter: each agrees very closely in structure with the single stele of Heterangium. Medullosa anglica may be described as a polystelic Heterangium and as having the same relation to Heterangium as regards the stelar system as Primula auricula bears to the monostelic Primula. The central core of the stele (the black patches in the diagram, fig. 416, A) consists of an anastomosing system of tracheal groups embedded in an irregular parenchymatous reticulum. The large primary tracheids reach a diameter of 150μ and have multiseriate pitting: at the periphery of the primary xylem there is a more definite grouping of tracheids as in Heterangium, and the slightly internal (mesarch) protoxylem elements are associated with scalariform and densely spiral tracheids (fig. 416, B, C) narrower than the more internal reticulate elements. The secondary xylem is manoxylic as in Cycads, tracheids in 2–4 radial series alternating with medullary rays 1–3 cells broad and usually of considerable depth (fig. 416, B). The principal rays are continuous with the parenchymatous matrix of the central core. Thick-walled tubular elements, no doubt of the nature of sieve-tubes, form a conspicuous feature in the phloem.

The three steles occasionally divide and fuse with one another. The tissue between the steles is crushed and disorganised and in the living plant was probably small in amount. In the imperfectly preserved inner cortical region there is a sinuous band of secondary parenchyma (periderm; fig. 416, A, c) developed from a deep-seated phellogen; in older stems this formed the superficial tissue after the fall of the leaves. There is no definite boundary between the cortex of the stem and the petiole-bases except when the hypoderm cuts across the cortex preparatory to the separation of a leaf-stalk. The stem-cortex and the ground-tissue of the petioles consist of parenchyma with numerous secretory canals, not sacs only as in Heterangium, and are abundantly supplied with scattered vascular bundles of collateral and exarch structure.

The leaf-traces are furnished by the peripheral tracheal groups at the free surface of the primary portion of each stele: each trace is at first concentric and consists of primary xylem with one or more protoxylem strands near the outer surface and is completely or partially enclosed by secondary xylem and phloem. In the course of its passage to the leaf a leaf-trace loses its secondary tissues, which were added by the cambium during the traverse of the zone of secondary wood, and divides into small collateral bundles consisting mainly of spiral and scalariform tracheids. The collateral bundles accompanied by some narrow fibres are of the Myeloxylon type (fig. 420), the xylem being wholly centripetal. In the behaviour of the leaf-traces and in the vascular system of the petioles Medullosa differs from Heterangium and Lyginopteris. Each leaf-base is supplied by sets of vascular strands which pass into it from the stem at different levels; a large leaf-base reaching 4 cm. in diameter receives as many as 70–80 bundles. The hypoderm is like that first described in the French species Myeloxylon Landriotii[247] and often spoken of as the Sparganum type of hypoderm. The branching of the rachises points to a compound frond, and the occurrence of numerous linear pinnules with revolute margins (fig. 420, D) in association with the stem suggests that the ultimate segments were of the Alethopteris form. This inference receives confirmation from the occurrence of petrified specimens of undoubted Alethopteris rachises with the structure of Myeloxylon. It is practically certain that the leaves borne on the stems of Medullosa anglica are those long known as Alethopteris lonchitica (Vol. +ii.+ A, p. 553, fig. 364).

An interesting feature in the stems is the occurrence of cortical vascular strands (fig. 416, A, a, b), reaching a diameter of 7 mm., containing scattered tracheids in a parenchymatous core surrounded by secondary xylem and phloem. These cauline bundles are almost identical both in structure and distribution with the accessory steles in the stem of a recent Cycas, and the agreement is emphasised by the presence of short square-ended tracheids in the primary xylem.

The roots branch freely and may attain a diameter of more than 1 cm.: they are generally triarch and the triangular primary xylem is enclosed by secondary xylem except opposite the protoxylem. The cortex is like that of Lyginopteris roots and a conspicuous double layer of superficial tissue is another feature common to both (cf. fig. 410). The exceptionally well preserved specimens described by Arber[248] show very clearly the thick zone of periderm which forms the covering of older roots, and in some of the sieve-tubes groups of dark brown patches show the form and arrangement of the sieve-plates.

Reproductive organs. We have as yet no precise information in regard to the reproductive organs of Medullosa anglica, but there can be little or no doubt that the fronds bore seeds that have long been known under the generic name of Trigonocarpus. Many years ago Mr Hemingway noticed the almost constant association of the fronds of Alethopteris lonchitica with Trigonocarpus, and Dr Kidston’s discovery[249] of seed-bearing Neuropteris pinnae considerably strengthened the evidence derived from mere association. The structure of Trigonocarpus is described later (p. 117) in a section devoted to reproductive organs attributed to Medullosa. Nothing is known as to the microspore-bearing organs.

While in the structure of each of the steles Medullosa anglica agrees very closely with Heterangium, it differs from that genus in the presence of three steles and in the structure of the petioles which are much less fern-like than the simpler petioles of Heterangium and Lyginopteris. From the continental species the British species is distinguished by its simpler stelar system, though there is a close correspondence as regards individual steles.

Medullosa pusilla Scott.

This species, briefly referred to by Scott in 1909[250] and fully described in a recent paper[251], is founded on material from the Lower Coal Measures of Colne, Lancashire. It agrees in essential features with Medullosa anglica, but differs in the following particulars: the linear dimensions of the stem are about one quarter those of a typical stem of the older species; the leaf-traces possess little or no secondary xylem and the relatively large decurrent leaf-bases have a narrower and simpler hypoderm. The stem has a tri-stelar vascular system enclosed in a ring of internal periderm, and each stele (3 mm. in diameter) consists of a roughly triangular strand of reticulate tracheids and a small amount of scattered parenchyma. The protoxylem is either exarch or, as in M. anglica, mesarch, the exact position being difficult to determine in the available material. The secondary xylem closely resembles that of M. anglica.

Scott suggests the possibility that Alethopteris decurrens may be the foliage of Medullosa pusilla. It is possible that there is no specific difference between M. pusilla and M. anglica, but on the present evidence the employment of a distinctive name is desirable.

Medullosa centrofilis de Fraine.

This species was founded by Miss de Fraine[252] on a petrified stem from the Lower Coal Measures of Lancashire. The maximum diameter of the flattened stem including four decurrent leaf-bases is 5 cm. The vascular system consists of an outer group of four steles, reduced to three by fusion in the upper part of the specimen, enclosing a central smaller stele or star-ring (fig. 417). It is the presence of the star-ring that distinguishes this type from the other two British species and forms a connecting link with certain continental Medullosae. The peripheral steles agree with the steles of M. anglica but, as in M. pusilla, there is some doubt as to the exarch or mesarch position of the protoxylem. In the structure of the xylem the central stele conforms to the rest of the vascular system and a strand of protoxylem is preserved that is almost certainly exarch. There is evidence that the peripheral steles occasionally anastomose, but the central stele follows an independent course at least in the piece of stem examined. Leaf-traces are furnished by the primary xylem of the outer steles, and they appear to be without secondary tracheids as in M. pusilla. A zone of secondary cortex encloses the vascular system as in the other British stems: it is pointed out by Miss de Fraine[253] that this tissue, usually described as a deep-seated periderm, must have differed from cork in that there is no sign of drying up or decay in the tissues external to it. The leaf-bases are of the usual Myeloxylon type. In size this species is intermediate between Medullosa anglica and M. pusilla.

Medullosa stellata Cotta.

Cotta[254] described Medullosa stellata as a stem characterised by the occurrence of several many-rayed stellate columns (‘vielstrahlige Sternsäule’) in a pith enclosed by a double cylinder of secondary xylem. The so-called pith is the central ground-tissue of the stem and the double ‘striated ring’ of Cotta is a cylindrical stele identical in structure with each of the steles of Medullosa anglica but having a tubular form instead of forming a relatively broad and short band (cf. fig. 416, D and A). Goeppert[255] in his Permian Flora gave a detailed account of the species, some of his sections being cut from Cotta’s material, and by the employment of varietal epithets emphasised the range of variation within the limits of the type. Goeppert and Stenzel[256] and, several years later, Weber and Sterzel[257] adopted the same plan as a convenient method of drawing attention to differences in anatomical characters. As Schenk[258] pointed out, there is a considerable risk in the case of small pieces of stems of attaching excessive importance to structural variations, and it is by no means improbable, as he said, that differences which are the expression of states of preservation or stages in development have been incorrectly regarded as distinguishing marks of individual plants. It is, however, convenient to recognise some of the more striking deviations from the type-species by speaking of the different forms as varieties though, as Weber and Sterzel fully admit, such varieties and even some of the species must be looked upon as provisional. Weber and Sterzel give expression to the provisional nature of their grouping by classifying the species with their varieties into form-cycles. Under the form-cycle Medullosa stellata five more or less well defined forms are recognised, the type-species being Medullosa stellata var. typica[259].

Medullosa stellata var. typica.

Part of a transverse section of a cylindrical stem is represented diagrammatically in fig. 416, D. Very little of the cortex is preserved: a parenchymatous axial region with scattered secretory canals contains four oval or cylindrical vascular steles, the stellate columns of Cotta or star-rings of later authors. These are of the same nature as the small central stele in the English Medullosa centrofilis. The central region of the stem in this specimen is completely surrounded by a narrow cylinder of inversely orientated secondary xylem and phloem (fig. 416, D), the phloem being on the inner side of the xylem. Beyond the xylem is a parenchymatous band containing scattered groups of primary xylem tracheids with spiral, scalariform, and reticulate pitting, and this zone, which is usually designated the ‘partial pith,’ is succeeded by a second and broader, normally orientated, cylinder of secondary xylem and phloem. In this section the two concentric cylinders separated by the partial pith form a solenostele like that of several recent Ferns except in the presence of secondary tissue. The term ‘partial pith’ applied to the tissue between the two cylinders of secondary tissue is misleading: this tissue (fig. 416, D, p) is the primary xylem of the stele and is homologous with the primary portion of the stele of Heterangium and of the steles of M. anglica. In many sections the continuity of the tubular stele is broken. In a section in the British Museum cut from one of Cotta’s specimens[260], 6 × 3·5 cm. in diameter to the outer edge of the vascular tissue, the cylindrical stele is interrupted at two places. An example of the interrupted type of stele is shown in fig. 416, F, and in fig. 416, H: the latter belongs to a distinct species. The complete type of cylindrical stele is exceptional and occurs occasionally at different levels in the stem. An important point is that the frequent breaks in the cylinder are not connected with the exit of leaf-traces and do not, therefore, correspond to the foliar gaps in the solenostele or dictyostele of a Fern.

The secondary xylem is of the cycadean type (fig. 418, B, D) like that of Heterangium and Lyginopteris and several other stems. Each of the star-rings in the axial region consists of a parenchymatous core with scattered primary tracheids enclosed by secondary vascular tissue (fig. 418, B). The star-ring shown in fig. 418, B, from a Chemnitz stem illustrates the characteristic cycadean character of the secondary xylem with broad medullary rays: some of the innermost elements are in contact with the primary tracheids. The phloem is rendered conspicuous by the black contents in some of the elements. Both the star-rings and the larger peripheral steles are constructed on the same plan and agree with the steles of M. anglica. The star-rings occasionally branch and anastomose with one another and with the encircling stele. The star-ring in fig. 416, D at a is about to give off a small strand.

Leaf-traces are furnished by the primary xylem at the edge of the ‘partial pith’ of the outer stele: as a leaf-trace passes outwards through the outer cylinder of secondary xylem the cambium invests it with secondary xylem and phloem, but as it passes through the cortex of the stem it becomes reduced to its primary elements, and by successive branching gives rise to small collateral bundles which enter the petioles. The piece of stem shown in fig. 416, G, illustrates the exit of leaf-traces from the stele and their subsequent division into several small bundles, v, which are scattered in the cortex with strands of sclerenchyma. In a specimen identified with Medullosa stellata, Schenk[261] found part of a leaf-base attached to the stem: its vascular system was of the Myeloxylon type, the bundles being identical with those in the cortex of the stem seen in fig. 416, G.

In some stems of M. stellata the outer, centrifugally developed, portion of the main stele is very much broader than in the example represented in fig. 416, D. The diagrammatic sketch reproduced in fig. 416, F, represents a section of a Chemnitz specimen in the British Museum[262] in which the axial region containing several star-rings is almost enclosed by an inner zone of secondary xylem, and beyond the narrow primary xylem (black in the sketch) the rest of the block consists exclusively of secondary xylem 5·5 cm. broad. This example illustrates a common tendency in Medullosa towards a large excess of centrifugal over centripetal secondary vascular tissue. A similar specimen of Medullosa stellata is figured by Mougeot[263] from the Vosges showing a considerable development of centrifugal xylem comparable with that in the British Museum stem. Weber and Sterzel[264] describe stems of Medullosa stellata showing slight periodic swellings which it is suggested, though there is no evidence in support of the opinion, may be connected with reproductive organs.

* * * * *

Medullosa stellata var. corticata[265]. The specimen referred to this variety, represented in fig. 416, G, has already been quoted as affording data with regard to the origin and behaviour of the leaf-traces. In this type of stem the outer portion of the main stele is narrower than in M. stellata var. typica and the stele never forms a complete tube. The star-rings in the centre of the stem are more numerous than in the type-species of the genus. In the axial region of some stems included in the form-cycle to which M. stellata belongs there may be flatter and tangentially elongated vascular strands in addition to the cylindrical star-rings; these are termed plate-rings.

* * * * *

In Medullosa stellata var. lignosa[266] the outer xylem reaches a breadth of 4 cm. and the star-rings are reduced to one. The form M. stellata var. gigantea[267] (fig. 416, K) is of special interest as an example of a stem reaching a diameter of nearly 50 cm. and having as many as 43 large and small star-rings in the axial region. A large tubular stele like that of the type-species (fig. 416, D) surrounds the central region, but in this form the cylindrical stele a is succeeded by concentric cylinders of normally orientated xylem and phloem (fig. 416, K, bb) produced by successive cambiums either cortical or pericyclic in origin. This type of stem presents a striking resemblance to stems of Cycas and Macrozamia except in the possession of a double cylindrical stele consisting of both centripetal and centrifugal secondary xylem and phloem separated by a zone of primary xylem (partial pith).

Medullosa gigas Renault.

This species was founded on a piece of stem from the Permian of Autun[268], consisting almost entirely of secondary xylem, which Brongniart had previously placed in his genus Palaeoxylon[269]. The secondary xylem reaches a diameter of 45–50 cm. and in the portion of the central region preserved there are a few vascular strands like the star-rings of other species. The considerable development of secondary xylem indicates a form of stem similar to some forms of M. stellata (e.g. fig. 416, F), but as the available data are insufficient for accurate determination Renault’s specific name is retained. Renault describes the internal xylem cylinder (i.e. the centripetal xylem) as very slightly developed or as hardly visible, a feature in which the French specimen shows a nearer approach to the structure of a recent Cycad.

Medullosa porosa Cotta.

The second of Cotta’s species[270], which has been fully investigated by Weber and Sterzel, is constructed on the same plan as that of M. stellata, but the stem is distinguished by the greater number of star-rings and, more especially, by the presence of an outer system of vascular strands in the axial region (fig. 416, M): these form a frequently interrupted cylinder of anastomosing strands characterised by the feeble development of secondary xylem and phloem or by the absence of this tissue on the outer face of the strands. The component parts of this outer series occasionally fuse with the internal star-rings.

Medullosa Solmsi Schenk[271] var. typica Web. and Ster.[272]

This type has a large axial region containing several very small star-rings enclosed by two concentric zones of separate plate-rings (fig. 416, E) each consisting of a complete flattened cylinder of secondary xylem and phloem enclosing primary xylem. As the complete cylindrical stele of the stem of Medullosa stellata shown in fig. 416, D, was compared with the solenostele of a Fern, so in this stem (fig. 416, E) the vascular cylinder may be compared at least superficially with a dictyostele. From the inner circle of plate-rings strands are given off in the form of star-rings and these pass through the gaps in the outer system, eventually breaking up in the cortex into numerous collateral bundles. In another form of this species, var. lignosa (fig. 416, L), the axial region is enclosed by a circle of plate-rings like those in the type-form, but these are succeeded by a circle of very asymmetrically developed and large steles with the outer xylem and phloem much broader than the inner. Moreover in this form additional cylinders of normally orientated vascular tissue are added as in M. stellata var. gigantea and in some recent Cycads. It is noteworthy that the secondary wood of Medullosa Solmsi is rather more compact than in other species, a feature in which it to some extent agrees with the South African genus Rhexoxylon.

Medullosa Leuckarti Goeppert and Stenzel.

In this species[273], also from the Permian of Saxony, the central region including some star-rings is surrounded by sinuous flattened concentric steles (snake-rings) agreeing anatomically with the steles of other species and characterised by the comparatively small breadth of the secondary xylem and phloem (fig. 416, H). Leaf-traces are given off, as in M. anglica and other species, from the outer edge of the primary xylem. In some forms there is a single set of snake-rings; in others there is a double series. Fig. 418, D, shows part of the secondary xylem of a stele of this species from Chemnitz: the tracheids are in some places continuous with the primary xylem, and on the outer edge of the secondary wood is a cylinder of phloem. A section of Medullosa Leuckarti figured by Goeppert and Stenzel[274] shows some radial rows of very thick-walled elements in the secondary phloem which they describe as bast sclerenchyma, but Solms-Laubach[275] believes them to be sieve-tubes. Precisely similar elements are figured by Scott[276] in M. anglica and as this author suggests the thick walls are probably not an original feature. The structure of the primary xylem is more clearly seen in fig. 418, C, and the relation between primary and secondary xylem is shown in fig. 416, I, where the position of the protoxylem may be either exarch or mesarch. The protoxylem is only occasionally recognisable but some of the peripheral primary tracheal groups are undoubtedly mesarch. External to the stele, a part of which is reproduced in fig. 418, D, are strands of stereome elements and beyond them a band of radially elongated cells that may be ‘periderm’: still farther out there are some imperfectly preserved vascular bundles that are leaf-traces. This species is important as affording a complete demonstration of the organic connexion between the stem and petioles of the Myeloxylon Landrioti type which indicate that the fronds were probably Alethopteroid.

The specimen on which the diagrammatic drawing reproduced in fig. 419 is based has been investigated by Weber and Sterzel[277] and by Solms-Laubach[278]. The figure is a slightly simplified version of that given by Weber and Sterzel; it represents the stem of Medullosa Leuckarti as a transparent object, the two lower transverse sections, B and C, being seen in perspective through the longitudinal faces. The steles are shaded obliquely in the longitudinal sections, and in the three transverse sections, A, B, C, the primary xylem (partial pith) is black and the enclosing secondary vascular tissue radially shaded. The whole block is 9 cm. in length and 6 cm. broad. Only a part of the axial region is shown internal to the peripheral snake-rings and in it are the star-rings S, S, b, and c. Outside the main steles is the narrow cortex R and portions of leaf-bases I–IV. The lowest section, C, shows part of a peripheral snake-ring with a slight swelling at f on its inner side which, as seen in sections B and A, foreshadows the separation of the star-ring S and the consequent break in the continuity of the snake-ring (d, e, sect. B). In section A the gap is closed: in the longitudinal section between B and A the star-ring S is seen to form two branches, a and b, the branch a closing the gap between d and e in section B. These sections demonstrate the formation of a star-ring from the main peripheral stele and the formation of additional star-rings by branching.

Numerous vascular bundles destined for the leaves are scattered in the cortex. The course of the decurrent leaf-base I is shown on the longitudinal faces, its boundary being marked by crowded stereome strands (of the Myeloxylon Landrioti type); other leaf-bases are represented by II, III, and IV.

In habit Medullosa Leuckarti differs from such a type as M. stellata in its relatively shorter and stouter stem and in the shorter internodes.

+Leaves and Reproductive Organs.+

i. Leaves. It has already been stated that in some cases petioles occur in organic connexion with Medullosan stems, notably in M. anglica and M. Leuckarti: in the exceptionally rich collection in the Chemnitz Museum, which forms a fitting memorial of the work of the late Prof. Sterzel, there is a stem of M. Leuckarti bearing large petioles of the type known as Myeloxylon radiatum. The occurrence of vascular bundles in the cortex of other species of stem identical with those in the attached petioles points to a uniform type of leaf-structure so far as regards the petioles and rachises of Medullosa. While it is clearly unnecessary to distinguish by a special generic title the petrified portions of fronds known to belong to certain species of stems, the frequent occurrence of detached petioles necessitates some distinctive term. The name employed is Myeloxylon: the genus was instituted by Brongniart in 1849 for Cotta’s species Medullosa elegans the petiolar nature of which was suspected by Binney in 1872.

Myeloxylon (Medullosan leaf-stalks).

1832. Medullosa elegans Cotta. 1865. Stenzelia Goeppert. 1876. Myelopteris Renault[279]; 1877, Aulacopteris Grand’Eury[280].

There is a very close agreement in general anatomical structure between the numerous specimens of Myeloxylon from the Permian strata of Saxony and France and the Coal Measures and Millstone Grit of England[281]; the genus is also recorded from the Upper Carboniferous of Kansas[282]. Two well-defined types instituted by Renault are, however, readily distinguished by the form of the hypodermal stereome strands. Myeloxylon may be defined as follows: Oval or cylindrical branched axes, reaching a diameter of 15 cm., bearing pinnae having the characters of Alethopteris, Neuropteris, Odontopteris, and some other genera that were formerly classed as Ferns. Below a single-layered epidermis, in which stomata have been recognised, occur a few layers of parenchyma: this superficial tissue, which is rarely preserved, is succeeded by a hypodermal region consisting of parenchymatous tissue and numerous vertical groups of narrow thick-walled fibres arranged as radial plates or circular, oval, or reniform strands (the Sparganum type of cortex). In the hypoderm as in the ground-tissue generally secretory canals, often accompanied by stereome, are a characteristic feature. The vascular system is represented by a considerable number of collateral bundles scattered through the ground-tissue and especially abundant in the outer region: the bundles sometimes assume a more or less regular disposition in concentric circles. Each bundle consists of a small group of xylem tracheids, for the most part spiral or scalariform, though reticulately pitted elements are by no means rare, with a single protoxylem group on the outer face next the phloem (fig. 420, B, C). As a rule the xylem is wholly centripetal, but occasionally the exarch structure becomes mesarch by the occurrence of a few centrifugal tracheids. The phloem, rarely preserved (fig. 420, B), consists of narrow sieve-tubes with parenchyma, and the bundle as a whole is often partially enclosed by a sheath of fibres.

Superficially the anatomical structure is similar to that of the petioles of Angiopteris or Marattia, and both Williamson[283] and Renault placed Myeloxylon in the Ferns; but the collateral form of the vascular bundles, the position of the protoxylem, and the arrangement of the hypoderm tissues, are cycadean features.

Myeloxylon radiatum (Renault).

This type is characterised by the radially elongated stereome of the hypoderm. Prof. Zeiller[284], who has given a very clear and concise description of Myeloxylon, is disposed to regard Cotta’s Medullosa elegans as a specifically distinct form on the ground that there are two concentric zones of stereome in the hypoderm; but this feature is shown only in one of Cotta’s figures, and Weber and Sterzel[285] point out that a doubting of the hypoderm zone may be caused by accidental juxtaposition of two faulted pieces of peripheral tissue. The drawing reproduced in fig. 420, A, shows the structural plan of an unusually large petiole from the Permian of Autun: a portion of the outer tissue is seen in fig. 418, A. The vascular bundle, fig. 420, C, from a Millstone Grit specimen[286], shows the centripetal nature of the xylem and fragments of phloem in the outer half of the bundle, with imperfectly preserved fibres abutting on the xylem. The characteristic hypoderm is shown also in fig. 418, A; the double xylem strand on the left illustrates a common feature caused by the branching of vascular bundles. Several secretory canals are scattered in the ground-tissue. The pinnules of Myeloxylon radiatum, or at least of some specimens, have been shown by Renault to be of the Neuropteris type.

Myeloxylon Landrioti (Renault)[287].

In this species the distinguishing feature is the occurrence of the hypodermal stereome in the form of circular, oval, or reniform strands in place of the radial plates of M. radiatum. It is this form of petiole that was borne by the stems of Medullosa anglica and M. Leuckarti. In M. anglica the pinnules (fig. 420, D) are of the Alethopteris type, almost certainly A. lonchitica. Renault and Zeiller have described French specimens of Myeloxylon Landrioti bearing pinnules like those of Alethopteris aquilina and A. Grandini.

Myeloxylon topekense (Penhallow).

The occurrence of Myeloxylon petioles in the New World was recorded by the late Prof. Penhallow[288] who founded this species on some imperfectly petrified specimens from Upper Carboniferous strata at Topeka, Kansas. Enough material was available to show the Myeloxylon characters, but the preservation is too imperfect to admit of a complete diagnosis. The hypodermal stereome shows a tendency to form tangentially extended strands in place of the more circular or radially elongated groups in the European species.

In addition to Alethopteris, Neuropteris (including Cyclopteris) and Odontopteris fronds, which are known to possess rachises with the Myeloxylon features, there is reason to believe that the Permian Callipteris fronds and possibly some of the older Taeniopteris leaves may also belong to Medullosa[289]. It is, however, unsafe to assume that the occurrence of Myeloxylon petioles necessarily denotes the existence of Medullosa. The French stem Colpoxylon aeduense Brongn.[290] bore leaves with the same general anatomical features as those of a typical Myeloxylon, and there can be little doubt that other genera of the Medulloseae also possessed fronds constructed on the same plan as those known to have been borne by Medullosa. An interesting illustration of an injured organ that had produced a wound-cambium is afforded by a Myeloxylon petiole from the Coal Measures described by Mr Holden[291].

+Reproductive Organs.+

Reference was made in volume +ii.+ to the reasons which led to the removal of several genera of Carboniferous and Permian fronds from the Filicales to the Pteridosperms, and in Chapter +xxix.+ of the present volume certain species of Sphenopteris are described as the foliage of Lyginopteris and Heterangium. It is with such genera as Neuropteris, Alethopteris, Linopteris and others that we are now more especially concerned, as they represent some of the types of leaves borne by Medullosa and other members of the Medulloseae. The absence of any specimens among the large number of these common genera bearing undoubted sporangia aroused suspicion as to the correctness of the generally accepted view that these fern-like fossils were the leaves of Palaeozoic Ferns. Subsequently the suspicion based on negative evidence was confirmed by researches into the anatomical structure of the leaf-bases, petioles, and fragments of pinnae attached to and associated with stems of Medullosa. It is only in a few cases that actual organic connexion between reproductive organs and Medullosan leaves has been demonstrated, but from such facts as are established it is safe to make the general statement that stems of Medullosa—a generic term that undoubtedly includes plants which, had we a fuller knowledge of them as complete individuals, would be assigned to more than one generic type—possessed fronds simulating in habit those of certain Ferns with some of the pinnae bearing seeds often of considerable size and in all cases of complex structure, agreeing in many respects with those of existing Cycads, while other fronds, or in some cases it may be other pinnae, bore microsporangia similar in form to the sporangia of Ferns.

a. Microsporangia.

Neuropteris. A. Neuropteris heterophylla[292].

Several examples of supposed fertile specimens of Neuropteris are recorded in palaeobotanical literature, but it was not until 1887 that any satisfactory specimen was discovered. In that year Kidston[293] described a specimen of Neuropteris heterophylla from the Lower Coal Measures of Scotland in which slender forked branchlets bear small bodies at their tips some of which appear to represent four-valved organs (fig. 421, D), though the imperfect state of preservation renders impossible any definite pronouncement as to their structure. To the specimen are attached a few sterile pinnules, showing that it is a portion of a frond of N. heterophylla characterised by the substitution of reproductive organs for pinnules. The subsequent discovery of seeds attached to pinnae of the same species afforded strong presumptive evidence, almost amounting to proof, of the microsporangial nature of the Scotch specimen. For this specimen, although no precise diagnosis is possible, Dr P. Bertrand[294] has proposed the generic name Neurotheca. In 1911 the Abbé Carpentier[295] described some small ovoid bodies, 1–1·5 mm. long, from the Coal Measures of France arranged in groups of 4 to 6 and in some cases said to be borne on a slender pedicel which he found in association with N. heterophylla and compared with sporangia described by Lesquereux from the Coal Measures of Arkansas as Sorocladus stellata[296]. These supposed microsporangia have recently been assigned by Bertrand[297] to Sphenophyllum.

B. Neuropteris gigantea, etc. Potoniea, Zeiller.

In 1899 Zeiller[298] instituted the name Potoniea for some peculiar fertile leaves found in the Coal Measures of Heraclea consisting of a branched axis with cuneate segments, 7–10 × 6–8 mm., bearing numerous fusiform bodies, 1–1·5 mm. long, at the upper edge (fig. 421, A). These marginal bodies he regarded as sporangia and expressed the opinion that Potoniea may be the fructification of some form of Neuropteris, Mariopteris or Alethopteris. Carpentier[299] afterwards described similar though rather larger examples from the Pas-de-Calais coal-field as microsporophyll fragments of some Pteridosperm: he stated that similar specimens had been found by Kidston in England. In a later work Carpentier[300] described the sporangia as crowded in groups (fig. 421, B) in the substance of the thick lamina of Potoniea, and he connected the fertile segments with Neuropteris gigantea, N. pseudogigantea Pot. and Linopteris obliqua (Bunb.). Similar specimens are said to have been found in Holland and Silesia. Bertrand[301] also records the association of Potoniea with Neuropteris gigantea and N. pseudogigantea: he describes some specimens as belonging to N. gigantea Sternb. while others, distinguished only by small differences, he attributes to N. pseudogigantea. Kidston[302] has recently drawn attention to the inconstancy of the characters mentioned by Potonié as distinguishing features of N. pseudogigantea, and he shows good cause for referring the examples so named to N. gigantea. The fertile lamina is almost orbicular in surface-view and attached to a slightly excentric pedicel; the microsporangia are borne on the lower surface and probably in groups as described by Carpentier.

Neuropteris Carpentieri Kidston. Kidston[303] has recently described some fertile leaflets under this name from the Westphalian series of South Staffordshire which he identifies with French examples referred by Carpentier[304] to Potoniea adiantiformis Zeill. The fertile pinnules are thick and sub-cyclopteroid in form; the upper surface bears densely packed, narrow and long, microsporangia, 4 × 0·5 mm., containing more or less spherical microspores 45–60μ in diameter; the ventral face of the lamina on the removal of the spores shows several strong veins. With these are associated sterile pinnules of the Neuropteroid type, and examples are described intermediate between the sterile and fertile leaflets. Kidston believes the specimens to be microsporophylls of some species of Neuropteris, but as the material does not suffice for identification with any known species a new name is proposed. It is pointed out that in some states of preservation the leaflets resemble Goeppert’s Permian species Dictyothalamus Schrollianus[305].

Alethopteris. Linopteris.

No specimens of Alethopteris fronds have so far been described that afford any information as to the nature of the microsporangia, and we have no means of knowing whether they were borne on naked pedicels as in Neuropteris heterophylla, or on modified pinnules as in N. gigantea.

Zeiller in 1888[306] described some fertile pinnules of Dictyopteris Schützii Roem. from Commentry bearing two rows of long sporangia: he subsequently transferred this species to the genus Linopteris[307] and expressed the opinion that the sporangia occur singly and not in groups as he originally believed. Zeiller compares the fertile pinnules with the type Crossotheca. Bertrand[308], as the result of examining similar specimens, has suggested that the fringe of pendulous bodies regarded by Zeiller as sporangia may be tooth-like lobes of modified pinnules which served to protect microsporangia borne on the lower surface of the lamina. The nature of the impressions is not clear, though there is little doubt that they are microsporophylls. The fertile pinnae of Linopteris obliqua (Bunb.) described by Carpentier[309] and Bertrand[310] closely resemble the microspore-bearing organs which have been referred to Neuropteris gigantea; they have the characters of Potoniea and consist of oval laminae similar to the sterile pinnules but about half their size: the lamina was attached excentrically to a slender stalk (fig. 421, C, E) and traversed by numerous occasionally anastomosing veins. No actual microsporangia have been discovered in organic connexion with the lamina.

b. Megasporangia.

Neuropteris.

Kidston’s discovery of undoubted seeds attached to pinnae of Neuropteris[311] marked an important step in our more exact knowledge of the morphology of Medullosan sporophylls. Specimens from the ironstone balls (Coal Measures) of Coseley near Dudley showed seeds attached to portions of pinnae bearing pinnules of Neuropteris heterophylla. The seeds are approximately 3 cm. long and from 1·10 to 1·40 cm. broad; oblong and gradually tapering from the middle to a slightly curved and obtuse apical snout (fig. 422). The outer surface shows numerous longitudinal ribs which no doubt represent hypodermal fibres. The preservation of the seeds, which appear to be circular in section, is not such as to render possible a description of structural features. In their asymmetrical form the seeds agree with the genus Platyspermum as recently defined by Arber, but Kidston’s specimens are in all probability radiospermic. Kidston compares the Neuropteris seeds with Rhabdocarpus tunicatus as figured from the Commentry coalfield[312] and with specimens from Gard named by Grand’Eury R. subtunicatus[313].

Additional proof of the occurrence of seeds on Neuropteris fronds is furnished by examples from the Coal Measures of Holland described by Kidston and Jongmans[314]: these seeds are of the same general type as those from Coseley but nearly twice as large, and they were borne at the tips of a dichotomously branched pedicel of Neuropteris obliqua. Grand’Eury in 1904[315] recorded the association of radiospermic seeds with Neuropteris fronds though no case of actual attachment was found. It is, however, noteworthy that he speaks of the frequent association with Neuropteris of seeds characterised by six or rarely twelve longitudinal keels, a feature recalling the sclerotesta of Trigonocarpus and allied seeds. Until petrified specimens are available it is impossible to refer the seeds of Neuropteris to a generic type founded on structural features: the seeds described by Kidston are, as he says, very similar in external characters to species assigned to Rhabdocarpus, and there can be little doubt as to the generic identity of the Neuropteris seeds and some of the impressions referred to Rhabdocarpus which are characterised by a similarity in form, an apical snout that gives an asymmetrical appearance to the specimens and the presence of numerous longitudinal striations[316]. It is, however, by no means certain that these seeds possessed the morphological features of Rhabdocarpus as described by Brongniart in petrified examples from St Étienne[317].

The seeds of Neuropteris may, as Kidston suggests, agree anatomically more closely with Pachytesta[318], a type that Grand’Eury associates with Alethopteris fronds. With a view to avoid the danger of incorrectly identifying petrified specimens and impressions that cannot be proved to belong to the same generic type, I have suggested the restriction of the name Rhabdocarpus[319] to seeds that do not furnish evidence as to internal structure, and the employment of the designation Rhabdospermum for seeds that conform to those described by Brongniart as Rhabdocarpus. The seeds of Neuropteris may be of the Rhabdospermum type or they may agree anatomically more closely with Trigonocarpus or Pachytesta; they are members of either the Trigonocarpales or the Cardiocarpales, probably the former group. Dr P. Bertrand[320] assigns to Neuropteris gigantea some seeds of the Hexapterospermum (= Hexagonocarpus[321]) type which occur in association with cupule-like organs. These supposed cupules resemble the Potoniea leaflets with microsporangia also referred to the same species of Neuropteris; they are characterised by a laciniate edge and may be compared with the Indian fossil described by Zeiller as Ottokaria bengalensis[322] (fig. 433). Dr Arber[323] and Dr P. Bertrand[324] have independently proposed the generic name Neurospermum for the seeds of Neuropteris heterophylla and N. obliqua in preference to Rhabdocarpus: the former author speaks of the seeds of N. heterophylla as Neurospermum Kidstoni. The generic term Neuropterocarpus used by Grand’Eury in 1904[325], though not defined by him, has priority and avoids the adoption of a new designation for seeds attached to Neuropteris fronds. In his definition of Neurospermum Arber makes no reference to the obliquity of the apical snout that is clearly shown in fig. 422. There is no evidence that Neuropterocarpus possessed a cupular investment comparable with that of Lagenostoma. Additional instances of the association of seeds with Neuropteris fronds are recorded by Renier from the Belgian Coal Measures, also by Bertrand and Chodat from France: Renier found seeds associated with N. Schlehani Stur and with the same species of frond Bertrand found impressions of oval ribbed seeds. Prof. Chodat[326] has figured some fragments of Neuropteris pinnules referred to N. auriculata Brongn. from the Stephanian of France which show small seed-like bodies apparently in organic connexion with the lamina; but the specimens are too imperfect to afford any satisfactory evidence as to the nature of the reproductive organs.

Lotsy[327] has expressed the opinion that the bodies attached to Neuropteris pinnae described by Kidston and other authors as seeds may possibly be vegetative buds, but if this were the case one would expect to find some evidence of the bud-nature in some at least of the specimens that have already been found.

It would seem that the microsporophylls of Neuropteris were constructed on different plans, some being of the type described by Zeiller and other observers as Potoniea, while others bore sporangia on pinnae without any accompanying laminae; but our knowledge of the latter form represented by Kidston’s specimen of Neuropteris heterophylla (fig. 421, D) is very incomplete. On the other hand the seeds appear to have been characterised by features suggesting a close affinity to Trigonocarpus and pointing to membership of the same family.

Alethopteris.

Although no specimens have been discovered showing actual connexion between fronds and seeds, it is practically certain that Alethopteris leaves, or at least some species of the genus, bore seeds of the Trigonocarpus type. The association of Trigonocarpus Parkinsoni with Alethopteris lonchitica is too frequent to be fortuitous and there is further evidence afforded by certain anatomical resemblances. In France other species of Alethopteris, e.g. Alethopteris Serlii and A. Grandini, occur in association with Pachytesta[328], a large seed similar to Trigonocarpus, and Trigonocarpus is found in the Pas-de-Calais coal-field with Alethopteris Serlii.

=TRIGONOCARPUS.= Brongniart.

The generic name Trigonocarpum was instituted by Brongniart in 1828[329] for ovoid longitudinally ribbed ‘fruits’ from Upper Carboniferous strata, the type-species being named T. Parkinsoni. The generic name is often altered to Trigonocarpon: Williamson[330], who adopted this form, states that Brongniart substituted Trigonocarpon for Trigonocarpum in his Tableau[331], but in that work the original termination is used, the form Trigonocarpon, probably the result of a slip, appearing only in the index. In his later work on seeds Brongniart adopted the name Trigonocarpus, and in recent years this has been widely employed. Among other species named by Brongniart are two previously referred by Sternberg to Palmacites. Several examples of Brongniart’s genus were described by Lindley and Hutton, and in their description of T. Noeggerathii the statement is made that a fractured specimen demonstrated that ‘the fossil in its ordinary state is an interior part divested of fleshy covering’[332]; this suspicion of the true nature of the nut-like fossils was afterwards proved correct by the investigations of Hooker and Binney[333] and by the later work of Williamson. The specimens on which the genus was founded are casts of seed-cavities and it is in this state that the seeds are usually preserved, often in large numbers, in the sandstones of the Coal Measures, as in the block shown in fig. 423 from the famous quarry at Peel near Bolton, Lancashire. Another type of preservation is represented by the seeds figured by Lindley and Hutton as Carpolithes alata[334], but the generic identity of the two states was not recognised until the discovery of petrified material afforded the clue. Figs. 424, 1, 425 illustrate the appearance of Trigonocarpus when preserved as a carbonised impression showing a thick fleshy envelope enclosing an oval kernel with a hard wall prolonged upwards as a longer or shorter micropyle. Casts of the seed-cavity are represented in figs. 423; 424, 2, 3. The surface of these casts occasionally shows one or more short cylindrical projections which are probably extensions of the sand or mud into holes formed in the testa by boring insects. The view that Trigonocarpus seeds are ‘obviously Palm fruits’ was not accepted by Hooker and Binney who inclined to regard them as the seeds of Conifers and compared them especially with the similar nuts of Ginkgo seeds (cf. fig. 631, C). It was Mr Wild[335] who was first struck by the association of Trigonocarpus and the petioles of Medullosa (Myeloxylon) and by some resemblances in structure between the testa and the hypoderm of the petioles; though, as Scott and Maslen[336] point out, the agreement is not so close as Wild believed, his view of a possible connexion between the reproductive and vegetative organs has been confirmed. Williamson extended our knowledge of the genus by his account of Trigonocarpus olivaeformis Lind. and Hutt., a form that is specifically identical with T. Parkinsoni Brongn. This author also drew attention to the close resemblance between Brongniart’s three genera Trigonocarpus, Hexapterospermum, Tripterospermum and expressed doubts as to the possibility of founding specific differences on casts of the Trigonocarpus type without the evidence of anatomy. Our knowledge of the structure of Trigonocarpus has in recent years been considerably extended by the researches of Oliver, Scott and Maslen, and Salisbury.

Trigonocarpus Parkinsoni[337] Brongniart.

The seeds of this species like all examples of the genus are radiospermic, that is radially symmetrical in contrast to the flattened or platyspermic seeds. The complete seed is elongate oval in form when preserved as an impression (fig. 425, A) and reaches a length of 4–5 cm.: the casts of the seed-cavity are ovoid and provided with three prominent ridges (fig. 424, 2, 3). The testa forms a thick covering differentiated into three regions, an outer flesh or sarcotesta, a sclerous shell or sclerotesta, and an inner flesh. Transverse sections show that the sclerotesta has three sharp longitudinal keels with corresponding furrows on the inner face, and between each pair of main ribs are 2–3 less prominent ridges, usually 12 in all (fig. 426). The sarcotesta consists of thin-walled parenchyma passing externally into a more lacunar tissue with a palisade-like hypoderm: the sclerotesta consists of thick cells which interlace and form an efficient protective shell. Both the sarcotesta and sclerotesta are continued into the apical region as the wall of the long micropyle, the sarcotesta being prolonged beyond the sclerotesta at the apex of the integument[338]. The micropyle is triangular in section and may exceed in length the whole seed (figs. 425; 426, A). Its form as seen in transverse section (fig. 426, B) suggests the presence of wings: this appearance may be deceptive and due to pressure or, more probably, it represents an original feature. The seed-body, that is the portion enclosed by the integument, consists of the nucellus, represented by a few crushed layers of cells, bounded by a well-defined epidermis; the nucellus is separated from the integument from the base of the seed upwards, an important feature in which this and some other Palaeozoic seeds differ from Lagenostoma and the seeds of recent Cycads which are characterised by an integument adnate to the nucellus up to the level of the shoulder; the seeds of the Conifer Phyllocladus afford an example of separation of integument and nucellus as in Trigonocarpus. The innermost layer of the nucellus consists mainly of tracheal tissue investing the large megaspore (fig. 426, A, C, m) which is preserved as a contracted membrane detached from the nucellus after the death of the seed. At the summit of the nucellus is a relatively small pollen-chamber (fig. 426, A, Pc) like a broad and low cupola bearing a terminal beak which extended some distance into the micropylar tube. No microspores have been found in this species, but Oliver[339] records the occurrence of multicellular microspores in Trigonocarpus pusillus. The pedicel of the seed had a central strand of sclerous tissue penetrated by a concentric vascular bundle which gives off six strands to supply the sarcotesta (fig. 426, C, v) and then passes into the nucellus where it forms a tracheal sheath (fig. 426, A, nt) surrounding the lower part of the megaspore and at a higher level breaks up into anastomosing strands of tracheids which reach up to the plane of insertion of the pollen-chamber.

A second species described by Scott and Maslen as Trigonocarpus Oliveri has been further investigated by Salisbury who finds that it is an 8-angled seed which cannot be retained in the genus Trigonocarpus: its systematic position ‘must for the present remain uncertain[340].’ Dr Arber has recently described a new species of Trigonocarpus, T. Moyseyi[341], from the Nottingham Coal-field (Middle Coal Measures), similar to T. Parkinsoni but much broader in proportion to its length: this species is founded on an impression without structure.

The species Trigonocarpus Dawesi Lind. and Hutt.[342], from the Middle Coal Measures of Lancashire, was founded on casts differing in their large dimensions from those of T. Parkinsoni: specimens referred to this species were described by Fiedler[343] from Saxony in 1857 and Lesquereux[344] figures similar casts from the Upper Carboniferous and Permian rocks of North America.

Trigonocarpus shorensis Salisbury.

This species, founded on specimens from the Lower Coal Measures of Shore, Lancashire[345], may exceed 4 cm. in length and has a breadth of 2·5 cm. In general plan it agrees with T. Parkinsoni but there are certain well-marked differences: the micropyle is much shorter; the thick sarcotesta, attaining a breadth of 6 mm. at the base of the micropyle, is characterised by the presence of six peripherally placed vascular bundles (fig. 426, D, v) in contrast to the deeply embedded bundles of T. Parkinsoni. Below the epidermis of the sarcotesta is a hypoderm formed of radially disposed plates of sclerous tissue similar to that of Myeloxylon and different from the palisade-like hypoderm of the type-species. Within the sarcotesta is a hard shell, the sclerotesta, characterised by three prominent ribs extending from base to apex and three shorter ribs which reach from the chalaza to about a third of the length of the seed. The fact that the sarcotesta and sclerotesta pass gradually into one another is a point in favour of the view that the integument is a single structure. There appears to be good evidence of the restriction of an inner flesh to the micropylar region, whereas this tissue in T. Parkinsoni was probably continuous over the whole inner face of the sclerotesta. The sarcotesta is lacunar in its outer part as in some other types of Palaeozoic seeds, a feature probably connected with floating efficiency. Trigonocarpus shorensis occurs in association with Myeloxylon petioles, and there is a resemblance between the seed and the vegetative organs in the structure of the hypoderm as also in the structure of the secretory sacs which are particularly numerous in this species. Salisbury draws attention to the close resemblance between the form of T. shorensis and the seeds found in organic connexion with pinnae of Neuropteris obliqua[346].

The species T. corrugatus described by Renault[347] bears a close resemblance to T. shorensis.

+Other Genera founded in part on Reproductive Organs which may belong to the Medulloseae.+

=Codonotheca=, =Schützia=, =Whittleseya=, =Dolerophyllum=, =Ottokaria=, =Strobilites=.

=CODONOTHECA.= Sellards.

Codonotheca caduca Sellards. This genus was founded on some spore-bearing bodies from the Coal Measures of Illinois[348]: nothing is known as to the plant which bore them, but Sellards is inclined to associate them with Neuropteris decipiens Lesq.[349], a species abundant in the same coal-field. Whatever may have been the parent-plant it is probable, as the author of the genus believes, that Codonotheca is the microspore-bearing organ of a Pteridosperm. As shown in fig. 427, 5, the form is that of a stalked cup consisting in the basal portion of a stout axis, the peripheral tissue of which is believed to have been fleshy, containing an axial rod of conducting tissue running up to the floor of the cup, c, and then dividing into six vascular strands, each of which forks into two branches. The upper part is composed of six linear segments united basally to form the sloping surface of the cup. On the inner face of each segment is a more or less well-defined depression covered with large elliptical spores ·29–·31 mm. long by ·18–·19 mm. broad (fig. 427, 6, 8). The presence of a median ridge (fig. 427, 8) indicates a bilateral origin. ‘There is no grouping of the spores or other indication of the location of the sporangia, which were doubtless more or less completely immersed in the tissue, the dividing wall disappearing at maturity.’ The spores are seen in fig. 427, 2, 3, on the inner face of the lobes. Some of the specimens have a fairly long pedicel: in the example shown in fig. 427, 1, the fleshy part of the basal portion is not preserved, only the more resistant vascular core. In a later account of these organs Sellards speaks of several lying by the side of a central stalk to which he thinks they were originally attached by slender pedicels. In view of Dr Benson’s interpretation of the morphology of Telangium it is permissible to suggest that if a central sporangium in such a synangium as that of Codonotheca developed a megaspore and the peripheral sporogenous lobes were sterilised, the result would be an arrangement not unlike the apical region of the seed Physostoma, the tentacles of which have been homologised with the canopy of Lagenostoma. There are obvious difficulties in the way of this, perhaps strained, comparison: the larger size of the spore-bearing linear segments of Codonotheca led Sellards to regard each as a synangium rather than a single sporangium. But precise information as to the structure of the American fossils is not as yet available. If the association of Codonotheca with Neuropteris fronds has any significance it would favour a reference of these organs to the Medulloseae. In the absence of anatomical data it is impossible in some cases to distinguish microspore-bearing organs of the Codonotheca type from small seeds enclosed in a lobed cupule or even seeds with a lobed integument: a case in point is the New Brunswick species Pterispermostrobus bifurcatus Stopes[350].

A Spitzbergen, Culm, fossil recently described by Nathorst[351] as Codonotheca (?) pusilla is briefly referred to under the genus Pterispermostrobus.

=SCHÜTZIA.= Geinitz.

This generic name was instituted by Geinitz[352] for some Permian fossils obtained by Bergmeister Schütz and regarded by the author of the genus as probably fertile branches of some Conifer. A more complete account was published by Goeppert[353] in his ‘Permian Flora,’ where the name Anthodiopsis Beinertiana occurs on the Plates, printed before the publication of Geinitz’s description, but in the text the specimens are referred to Schützia anomala.

Schützia anomala Geinitz.

The type-species, recorded from Bohemia and Silesia, is represented by fertile shoots consisting of a thick main axis bearing apparently two-ranked though probably spirally disposed short lateral branches, each of which terminates in a receptacle with numerous crowded linear-lanceolate bracts superficially resembling a partially expanded inflorescence of a Composite. Goeppert believed that the branches bore seeds and he refers to this species a number of detached, longitudinally striated and bluntly terminated, seeds. The same author describes other specimens from the same localities associated with Schützia anomala, which he names Dictyothalamus Schrollianus[354]: in habit these agree closely with Schützia but the receptacles, the reticulate appearance of which suggested the generic name Dictyothalamus, bear a large number of small bodies regarded as seeds. The preservation of the fossils is not such as to enable us to determine their true nature but it is probable that Schützia and Dictyothalamus are not generically distinct. In his description of Dictyothalamus Goeppert suggests that the two associated types may be the male and female shoots of one plant, but he speaks of seeds in both cases. Schimper[355], who unites Dictyothalamus with Schützia, regards the latter as female and the former as male.

Schützia Bennieana Kidston.

This species, described by Kidston[356] from the Calciferous series of Scotland, differs from S. anomala in its much more slender axis and in the relatively narrower and less globular clusters of bract-like appendages. The principal axis bears three lateral branches with terminal clusters of acute and narrow linear scale-leaves. No seeds were found in association with the specimens.

Schützia permiensis (Renault).

Renault founded this Permian species as Antholithus permiensis[357] on a specimen from Lodève; it consists of an incomplete inflorescence 6·4 cm. long bearing four lateral branches with stalks 1·5 to 2 cm. long terminated by clusters of small oval bracts 5 mm. long. Renault compares the fossil with the recent Conifers Glyptostrobus and Tsuga, but it exhibits a much closer resemblance to Schützia anomala.

The genus Schützia, originally described from Permian strata, is recorded also from Westphalian strata in North Africa[358] as well as from Lower Carboniferous rocks in Scotland. The data at present available are insufficient to determine the morphological nature of the fertile branches: the evidence adduced by Goeppert in support of the occurrence of seeds is not convincing and the interpretation of the bract-like appendages is still an open question; they may have formed a cupular investment to seeds, but in the Scotch species the general appearance rather suggests that they may be microspore-bearing organs comparable with those of Codonotheca[359]. There are no adequate grounds for supposing Schützia to belong to the Coniferales, a view advanced by some authors; it is much more likely to represent the fertile shoots of a Pteridosperm.

=WHITTLESEYA=. Newberry.

The genus Whittleseya, referred by many authors to the Ginkgoales, has no substantial claim to be regarded as allied to that group: its position is still uncertain, but the recent discovery of fertile specimens suggests the probability of a relationship to Potoniea and an identification of Whittleseya as another form of microsporophyll of a Pteridosperm.

The generic name was given by Newberry[360] to some leaves, or possibly leaflets, originally described by C. Whittlesey from the Coal Measures of Ohio. Whittleseya is represented by species from several North American localities[361] in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick[362]; it occurs in Silesia and has recently been found in the English Coal Measures[363]. The genus is confined to Upper Carboniferous strata.

The leaves are fairly thick; the lamina is oblong, cuneate, broadly triangular or linear, usually rounded and truncate (fig. 428, A, C), generally dentate at the distal end, the proximal portion being gradually or abruptly contracted and occasionally prolonged into a short pedicel. The veins or ribs are parallel to the sides of the lamina and except near the base unbranched.

Whittleseya elegans Newberry.

The type-species, from North America and Europe, is characterised by its shovel-like lamina from 3 to 6 cm. long closely resembling in shape some lepidopterous scales; the surface is ribbed, each rib corresponding to a tooth on the distal margin; on each of the parallel ridges are 4–5 longitudinal lines indicating either veins or stereome strands (fig. 428, A, C). The examination of preparations made by Dr Kidston from a leaflet of this species enables me to add a few facts with regard to the microspores. The spores, which cover almost the whole surface of the lamina, show a tendency to a more or less definite arrangement in longitudinal rows. Two types of cuticularised membrane are represented among the associated fragments: in some pieces of cuticle the cells are short and have straight walls while in others the preservation is inferior and the cells appear to be longer and narrower. One or both of these membranes probably belong to the sporangia. The oval slit, which is a striking feature on several of the spores (fig. 429), points to their bilateral nature and dehiscence along the major axis. A comparison of these spores with those obtained by Kidston from the English species Whittleseya fertilis reveals a very close agreement both in size and shape and confirms the identification of the Staffordshire specimens as leaflets of Whittleseya. The large size of the microspores and the gaping oval aperture in some of them are features in which they agree closely with the spores of Dolerophyllum fertile described by Renault[364]. In both cases the spores tend to be arranged in long groups and they are practically identical in form and in the nature of the exine; those of Dolerophyllum are 280μ long while those of W. fertilis reach a length of 220μ. In some of the Whittleseya spores the exine has split as in the specimen shown in fig. 429, but in others there are two curved lines along which dehiscence has begun, a character in which the spores appear to be identical with those of Dolerophyllum described by Renault who speaks of dehiscence by means of an operculum. There is, I venture to think, little doubt as to the very close affinity of the two types. The systematic position of Dolerophyllum is not certainly established; if the generic identity of the leaves described as D. Berthieri Ren. and the petrified specimens named D. fertile is assumed, it is a legitimate inference that the genus is founded on fertile pinnules of a Pteridosperm with foliage of the Neuropteris or Cyclopteris form. It would seem probable that both Whittleseya and Dolerophyllum fertile are microspore-bearing leaflets of Pteridosperms, possibly of some Medullosan plants. The leaflets of Whittleseya agree in form fairly closely with those of Potoniea adiantiformis Zeill. described on a previous page[365] as the male organs of a Pteridosperm.

The specimens described by Lesquereux from Pennsylvania as W. integrifolia and W. undulata are less satisfactory than W. elegans. The Arkansas species W. microphylla[366], characterised by the obcuneate form of the lamina, is said to occur not only as detached leaflets but in loose bunches at the ends of slender axes, a circumstance favourable to the suggestion, based on the recently described English specimens, that the Whittleseya leaves may be fertile pinnules of a Pteridosperm frond. Among other species attributed to Newberry’s genus is W. brevifolia Wh. from Nova Scotia[367] with much smaller broadly triangular leaves 7 mm. long exclusive of the petiole and 8 mm. broad at the distal end (fig. 428, B). Dr Matthew[368] has also described a Canadian species W. concinna from New Brunswick in beds assigned by Dr Stopes[369] to the Westphalian series.

Whittleseya fertilis Kidston.

Since the discovery of Whittleseya elegans in the Coal Measures of Staffordshire recorded by Mr Thomas, Dr Kidston has published an account of some specimens from the same district under the name Whittleseya (?) fertilis[370]: these consist of smaller cuneate scale-leaves or leaflets 1·4–2·4 cm. long and 8–9 mm. broad; the lamina has a dentate upper margin and is longitudinally ribbed. The scales occur in superposed pairs, closely fitting but not organically connected, at least in the state in which they are preserved; each pair forms a sporangium-like case enclosing numerous spores but the actual sporangia or synangia have not been preserved. Kidston describes the spores as 210–222μ in length, elliptical, and characterised in many cases by an oval slit; they are practically identical with the microspores of W. elegans.

=DOLEROPHYLLUM=. Saporta.

This name was proposed[371] primarily for a large ovoid petrified bud composed of rolled Cyclopteroid leaves from Permian rocks in the Ural Mountains, which had been previously described by more than one writer under different names and regarded as a young shoot of a Palm or other Monocotyledon. Eichwald[372], who published good drawings, called the fossil Noeggerathia Goepperti. Saporta connected with this species some leaf-impressions from the Permian of Bohemia described by Goeppert[373] as Noeggerathia cyclopteroides: in his family Dolerophylleae[374] the French author included other leaves which are probably not closely related to the type-species, Dolerophyllum Goepperti. The Dolerophylleae are spoken of by Saporta and Marion[375] as Progymnosperms. Before the publication of Saporta’s note Grand’Eury had instituted the genus Doleropteris[376] and the family Doleropteroideae; in the former he included several forms of leaves agreeing generally with Goeppert’s Noeggerathia cyclopteroides. Zeiller[377] adopts Grand’Eury’s designation for the Russian fossil in preference to Dolerophyllum, a choice justified by considerations of priority; but the latter name is retained in this account as it was assigned by Saporta to the specimen of greatest botanical interest, namely Dolerophyllum Goepperti, and because it does not suggest affinity to Ferns.

Dolerophyllum Goepperti (Eichwald).

The type-species is from the Zechstein of Orenburg in the Urals and no specimens having precisely the same structure have been found elsewhere. Eichwald assigned it, with leaf-impressions of various kinds, to the Noeggerathieae and named it Noeggerathia Goepperti: it had previously been described by Kutorga[378] as Aroides crassispatha and Unger[379] included it among the Palms as Palaeospathe aroidea. The species has been described also by Saporta and Marion and by Renault[380]. The following account is based on sections cut from a specimen in the British Museum[381] which, though assigned on the label (within a query) to France and named Dolerophyllum Berthieri, is undoubtedly Eichwald’s species from East Russia.

The specimen (fig. 430) is 9 cm. long and 4·2 cm. broad: at the slightly contracted and broken base is a piece of immature axis (fig. 430, B, a) 12 mm. in diameter overtopped by a mass of closely packed leaves encircling one another like the bulb-scales of an Onion (fig. 430 A, C)[382]. Most of the leaves included in the bud were attached to the axis below the broken base. The curved, dichotomously branched, veins are seen on some of the pieces of lamina on the surface of the bud (fig. 430, A). The considerable breadth of the leaves is demonstrated by the longitudinal and transverse sections. In fig. C most of the laminae can be traced through the whole height of each of the steep-sided arches: a few overlapping margins are seen in fig. D. The veins are for the most part imperfectly preserved and appear as clear spaces at regular intervals in the brown mesophyll. The axis of the shoot consists of homogeneous parenchyma except near the sloping sides where narrow dark bands (fig. 430, B, a) mark the position of desmogen-strands of thin-walled elongated elements representing an early stage in the development of vascular bundles some of which have already produced spiral tracheids. Short secretory cells accompany the immature conducting elements. The lamina slightly exceeds 2 mm. in thickness in the broadest part: the mesophyll is composed of large parenchymatous cells of elliptical or spherical form often loosely attached owing to the well-developed system of intercellular spaces. The lower epidermis, assuming that the outer face of the rolled leaves is the morphologically lower surface, forms a uniform layer of palisade cells characterised by their free conical ends (fig. 431, A, B, e) which in some oblique sections appear as sharply pointed papillae with almost filiform apices; but while the cells were doubtless papillose like those of the epidermis of a velvety petal, the pointed form is due in part to the greater distinctness of the dark contents as compared with the lighter cell-walls. The upper epidermis is much less distinct; it consists of smaller flattened cells with occasional stomata. Renault[383] figures a specimen with stomata in a better state of preservation. The vascular bundles are rendered conspicuous by large secretory cells on the lower side, in the larger veins in the form of an arc or irregular group (fig. 432, A), but in the finer veins as single cells (fig. 431, A, B). These sacs resemble the tannin cells accompanying the veins in a leaf of Ginkgo (cf. fig. 631, G). The xylem-elements are of two kinds, (i) elongated spiral and scalariform conducting elements, forming a vertical plate of a few rows in the larger veins (figs. 431, 432) or a small compact group in the more slender veins (fig. 413, A, B); (ii) much larger isodiametric cells with reticulate or spiral thickening resembling the transfusion-tracheids of Conifers or, perhaps more closely, similar elements in the leaves of Lepidodendron. These short tracheids are especially abundant on the flanks of the conducting tracheids (figs. 431, t; 432, A, t), but they sometimes form a complete investment. In the obliquely cut vein reproduced in fig. 431, D, the transfusion-tracheids are abundant: a few are enlarged in fig. 431, E. In the smaller veins (fig. 431, A, B) they are represented by the larger elements, t, on the sides of the conducting strands. The protoxylem lies close to the upper edge in the middle line (px, figs. 431, A; 432, A); it is difficult to determine its precise position, but it would seem to be slightly internal, the bundle being not quite endarch. No phloem was recognised in the British Museum specimen, but it presumably occurred, if present, where the black patch is shown in fig. 432, A. Renault describes some phloem in sections which he examined.

The mesophyll next the upper surface is in most cases represented by spaces between the veins which give a crenulated outline to the parenchyma (fig. 430, C, D); in some places the spaces contain remains of very loose and crowded cells suggesting the original presence of very lacunar tissue or possibly of thin-walled storage-cells. The confinement of stomata to what is assumed to be the upper surface may, as Renault and others have suggested, indicate leaves which floated on water, an inference opposed to the view that the gaps in the mesophyll mark the position of water-tissue.

No specimens have been described which enable us to correlate with certainty mature leaves or foliage-shoots with the petrified bud. It is, however, not improbable that the impression from Mount Pelé near Epinac named by Renault Dolerophyllum Berthieri[384] may be correctly referred to the same genus. The type-specimen consists of an axis, whether a rachis of a compound leaf or a shoot with simple leaves cannot be determined, bearing partially overlapping more or less orbicular leaves 18–20 cm. in diameter, with a Cyclopteris venation. Among other leaves of unknown affinity referred to the same genus attention is drawn to Dolerophyllum pseudopeltatum (Grand’Eury)[385] with an orbicular lamina reaching in some specimens 22 × 19 cm. Specimens of Dolerophyllum pseudopeltatum are figured by Renault from the Commentry coal-field[386], some of which reach a diameter of 12 cm. The only British specimen of a leaflet of this type which I have seen is one in Dr Kidston’s collection from the Stephanian series, Glamorganshire. It is probable that some at least of the impressions assigned to Dolerophyllum or Doleropteris would be more appropriately included in Cyclopteris or Cardiopteris and may have been borne on the axis of large Pteridosperm fronds. Grand’Eury[387] has also called attention to the difficulty of distinguishing the larger Cyclopteris leaflets from Dolerophyllum. Some of the Cyclopteroid leaflets figured by Roehl[388] on Neuropteris fronds differ but slightly from those of D. pseudopeltatum. The shoot showing large leaf-scars figured by Saporta and Marion[389] as probably the axis of a Dolerophyllum may well be a piece of Cordaites.

Microsporophylls assigned to Dolerophyllum.

Certain problematical fossils found in association with the sterile leaves of Dolerophyllum Berthieri have been described by Renault as the male organs of that species. These are elliptical discs, 6 × 5 cm., with an excentrically placed stalk: embedded in a carbonised lamina are numerous rows of elliptical bodies, 410μ × 280μ, characterised by two curved longitudinal grooves on the surface and regarded by Renault as pollen-grains. The chains of these microspores radiate outwards from the neighbourhood of the stalk and cover most of the surface of the disc (fig. 432, B). Some silicified pieces of similar spore-bearing discs from Grand’ Croix named Dolerophyllum fertile[390] afford additional information as to these remarkable reproductive organs. The earlier account of this species by Renault is confirmed by Solms-Laubach[391] who examined the original sections. The peltate fleshy discs preserved as incomplete specimens consist of lacunar parenchyma 15–18 mm. thick traversed at right angles to the surface by numerous loculi (fig. 432, C), circular or oval in transverse section, containing large numbers of microspores, s, similar in size and form to those on the carbonised discs of the Mt Pelé specimen. Vascular strands occur between and parallel to the spore-chambers. The spores contain 8–10 cells (fig. 432, D) and Renault believes that dehiscence of the exine occurred along the two deep grooves which mark the limits of an operculum. He emphasises the peculiar structure of the microspores by speaking of them as prepollinia: in size and in the presence of internal cells (? male prothallus) they resemble the spores found in the pollen-chamber of a seed described by Renault as Aetheotesta elliptica[392] which he thinks may belong to a member of the Dolerophylleae. It has also been suggested that Codonospermum may be a seed of Dolerophyllum[393]. An unconvincing specimen described by Saporta and Marion[394] as a seed-bearing bract is regarded by them as referable to Dolerophyllum, but the evidence for any connexion is far from satisfactory.

There is nothing definite to be said with regard to the affinity of Dolerophyllum Goepperti or the microsporophylls represented by D. fertile and the specimens associated with D. Berthieri. Renault considers that both sterile and fertile specimens belong to the same genus, which he assigns to a position between Pteridophytes and Cycads. As Solms-Laubach says, the evidence supplied by the structure of the veins of D. Goepperti in favour of a cycadean alliance is not convincing. The type of vernation is unlike that of any known Cycad or indeed of any Gymnosperm: the large size of the leaves is another though weaker objection to this comparison, as the pinnae of Bowenia (fig. 391) and especially those of some species of Zamia (fig. 388), are of equal or larger dimensions. If, as seems probable, the xylem-strands are mesarch that is a point of contact with recent Cycads, but the bundle as a whole bears but a remote resemblance to that of a cycadean leaf and is much more like the veins of Ginkgo. The bud shown in fig. 430, A, is probably a young shoot and not merely a large compound leaf. If it were an unexpanded frond of Neuropteris bearing Cyclopteris pinnules we should expect to find indications of scattered desmogen-strands such as would occur in the Myeloxylon type of rachis. The resemblance to most forms of Cordaites is by no means close though a few leaves referred to that genus (e.g. C. circularis, fig. 468, B) are similar to those of Dolerophyllum[395].

The male organs are unlike those of any other plant: they may be described as sporophylls with microsporangia or perhaps synangia embedded in the mesophyll and containing microspores similar to those of some Pteridosperms or true Gymnosperms. Attention has been called to the close resemblance of the spores shown in fig. 432, C, D to those recently discovered by Kidston and referred to the genus Whittleseya (fig. 429), and it is very probable that the striking similarity is an index of affinity.

=Ottokaria.= Zeiller.

Ottokaria bengalensis Zeiller. A specimen of doubtful affinity from the Lower Gondwana (Karharbari beds) of Passerabhia, India, was originally described by Zeiller[396] as Feistmantelia bengalensis, but in a postscript he substituted the name Ottokaria on the ground that Feistmantelia had previously been employed by Lester Ward. Fig. 433 is drawn from the original specimen: it consists of a stalk attached in a slightly excentric position to an almost orbicular lamina, 2·5 cm. in diameter, with subacute marginal teeth and traversed by numerous radially disposed striations. Zeiller compares the fossil with Whittleseya elegans and Rhipidopsis ginkgoides and assigns it with some hesitation to the Salisburieae. An examination of the type-specimen led me to form the opinion that it may be a cupular organ of a Pteridosperm that enclosed a seed. The lamina is slightly concave and has the form of a shallow cup; moreover the surface-features resemble those of a bract rather than the regularly veined lamina of a foliage-leaf. The specimen bears a very close resemblance to one figured by Bertrand[397] as the cupule of Hexapterospermum modestae which he connects with fronds of Neuropteris gigantea.

Ottokaria occurs in association with fronds of Glossopteris indica and with the large seeds described by Zeiller[398] as Cardiocarpus indicus. I have lately obtained some evidence in favour of assigning Feistmantel’s seeds Carpolithes Milleri[399] to the genus Glossopteris: among several specimens from the Lower Gondwana rocks of India I found an example showing a seed partially covered by a scale-leaf in its natural position which appears to be identical with scale-leaves of Glossopteris. It may be that the specimen represented in fig. 433 belongs to Cardiocarpus indicus, though this is a mere guess: my belief is that Ottokaria is a cupular organ that enclosed the base of a seed borne on a Pteridosperm. There is little doubt that as additional data are obtained it will be found that Pteridosperms played no inconsiderable part in the vegetation of Gondwana Land.

=Strobilites.= Schimper and Mougeot.

Strobilites Milleryensis (Renault).

This species, from the Permian of France, was placed by Renault in Cycadospadix[400], but having regard to the fact that it differs essentially in habit from Mesozoic examples of that genus the provisional name Strobilites[401] is suggested. The type-specimens are long and narrow spikes or loose strobili, 8–16 cm. long and 2–2·6 cm. broad; a stout axis bears spirally disposed bracts 8–10 mm. long attached by a slender decurrent pedicel expanded distally into a fan-shaped laciniate lamina with a convex upper face, and there are said to be two seeds attached to the sides of each pedicel (fig. 434). The oval seeds appear to be platyspermic and resemble Samaropsis fluitans Daws. Two of the strobili figured by Renault are attached at right angles to a second axis, a habit suggesting comparison with that of a large compound frond. Renault is inclined to regard these fertile shoots as cycadean and suggests a possible connexion with the Permian stems Ptychoxylon or Poroxylon, both of which are known to have produced fairly numerous branches. In habit the spikes are similar to some of the longer examples of Cordaianthus, but their preservation is not sufficiently good to afford accurate information as to the relation of seed to sporophyll. Strobilites Milleryensis is, perhaps, more likely to be the fertile branch of a compound frond of a Pteridosperm, and it is significant that the seeds have been found in association with Callipteris leaves.

=COLPOXYLON=. Brongniart.

Colpoxylon aeduense Brongniart. The genus was founded by Brongniart[402] on a piece of stem 15 cm. in diameter from the Permian of the Autun district and regarded by him as a distinct type, with certain resemblances to recent Cycads. A thick section in the British Museum, 13 cm. in diameter (fig. 435, A), illustrates the main anatomical features described by Renault[403], to whom our knowledge of the genus is chiefly due. There are two large steles of irregular outline closely resembling those of Medullosa Leuckarti (cf. fig. 416, H); each consists of a band of secondary xylem with broad medullary rays and a narrow zone of phloem enclosing a central region composed of parenchyma, in which strands of primary tracheids, both reticulate and spiral, pursue a more or less horizontal course, associated with a few small groups of vertical xylem-strands at the inner edge of the secondary wood. The manoxylic nature of the wood is clearly shown in fig. 436; the continuous ink-line marks the position of the cambium and the dots show the internal protoxylem. Homogeneous parenchyma surrounds the steles and beyond this is crushed tissue containing large secretory canals and nests of stereome fibres either as separate groups or in contact with the canals (fig. 435, C). In the same peripheral tissue occur scattered collateral vascular bundles (fig. 435, D) identical with those of Myeloxylon. The outer cortex of the stem is marked off from the more homogeneous inner region by a fairly distinct line where there is some indication of periderm. The anatomical features are clearly shown in fig. 436, a photograph from a section in Dr Kidston’s collection. At a is an imperfectly preserved vascular bundle with a crescentic group of secondary xylem which is probably a leaf-trace that has just emerged from the secondary cylinder. Renault speaks of these more or less circular strands as possibly connected with reproductive shoots, but it is more probable that they are homologous with the strands in the pericycle and inner cortex of Medullosa and represent leaf-traces before division into smaller collateral strands. Renault describes the stem as possessing seven vascular cylinders in the apical region and suggests branching of the main axis as the cause of the increase in number: there is, however, no evidence to support such correlation. The two steles seen in fig. 435, A, become merged at a lower level into a single stele of sinuous form (fig. 435, B).

Beyond the facts furnished by the leaf-trace bundles in the outer cortex and the occurrence of two large scars about 5 cm. in breadth on a stem figured by Renault, we have no positive information as to the form of the leaves or the structure of the reproductive organs. There is little doubt that the fronds were large and compound like those of most species of Medullosa. There is, however, some slight evidence that Alethopteris Grandini Brongn. and seeds of the Pachytesta type (fig. 497) were borne on Colpoxylon stems; this rests solely on the association in the Loire coal-basin[404] of Alethopteris fronds with stems presenting structural resemblances to Colpoxylon aeduense.

The striking resemblance between Colpoxylon and Medullosa Leuckarti has led certain authors[405] to propose the substitution of Medullosa for Colpoxylon. The resemblances though close are hardly sufficient to warrant this course. In Colpoxylon the stelar system is simpler; there is no central region with star- or plate-rings as in Medullosa Leuckarti but, as in Medullosa anglica, the vascular tissue consists only of large steles without a medullary system. Colpoxylon differs from M. anglica in the reduction in some parts of the stem of the vascular system to a single stele and, moreover, the primary portion of the steles is much more parenchymatous in structure and contains more irregularly anastomosing tracheal strands than is the case in M. anglica.

The alteration in the pattern formed by the vascular system at different levels in some Medullosan stems, especially in Colpoxylon, may be compared with the varying disposition of the vascular strands in the thick dorsiventral rhizomes of Polypodium heracleum Kunz. and P. quercifolium L. In the rhizome of P. heracleum there are two vascular systems, an outer, cortical, system in the form of a hollow cylinder composed of a lattice-work with polygonal meshes from which branches are given off to the roots, and a more complex medullary system that is concerned with the emission of leaf-traces. As shown by a series of drawings reproduced in an account by Klein[406] of the anatomy of these species of Polypodium, the inner system of steles consists of two cylinders connected towards the upper surface of the stem by a rounded arch of vascular strands; nearer the leaf-base the two cylinders meet and eventually a larger cylinder is produced partly from the upper halves of the two cylinders of the previous section and in part from the connecting arch: the remains of the two smaller cylinders become connected with the outer vascular system. These and other changes suggest comparison with Colpoxylon as also with the stelar changes in the stem of Ptychoxylon. The comparison cannot be carried beyond the grosser features and is chiefly interesting as affording a further illustration of a similarity in plan between some recent Ferns and extinct Pteridosperms and other Palaeozoic genera.

=RHEXOXYLON=. Bancroft.

Rhexoxylon africanum Bancroft. The genus Rhexoxylon was instituted for a new type of stem represented by a single incomplete specimen from the Karroo series of South Africa: its precise geological horizon is not known but it may be referred provisionally to the lower or Palaeozoic portion of the series. Though our knowledge of the morphological features of the type-species is far from complete owing in part to the method of preservation of the specimen and in part to the destruction of the outer portion of the vascular tissue and the whole of the cortex, Miss Bancroft’s careful description[407] demonstrates the existence of characters which justify the employment of a new generic name. Rhexoxylon is more nearly related to the Medulloseae than to any other group and is particularly interesting as the first recorded example of this group from the Southern Hemisphere.

Fig. 437 shows a transverse section (7 × 5 cm.) of the stem. The ground-tissue consists of fairly large-celled parenchyma with sclerous nests and a few bands of periderm. At the periphery of the stem are radially disposed groups of vascular tissue varying in size and to some extent in shape. Unfortunately the stem is incomplete and it is impossible to say how much vascular or other tissue originally existed beyond the present corroded edge. The vascular groups, or steles as they may legitimately be called, follow a vertical course through the length of the block (6·5 cm.) and afford only slight evidence of branching or anastomosing. A close examination of the steles shows that they consist of portions of two series, an inner and outer set; there is also a curved vascular band in the central ground-tissue (fig. 437, c) and some isolated and scattered patches of vascular elements. Each stele of the inner series is made up of two parts, an outer smaller and normally orientated group of secondary xylem and a larger inversely orientated inner group of identical structure. A single stele of the inner series is shown in fig. 438, B, C; the larger inner portion consists of slightly divergent rows of tracheids and uniseriate medullary rays and is separated from the smaller portion by a narrow space, a, occupied by crushed tissue which may correspond to the ‘partial pith’ or primary xylem of a Medullosan stele. The two groups of xylem are no doubt the products of two cambium arcs, the protoxylem of each group being situated on the flat inner face. The cambium and phloem are represented only by crushed brown cells on the curved outer edge of the xylem. The separate individuality of the two portions of each stele is indicated not only by the presence of the ‘partial pith’ but by the discontinuity of the tissue at the ends of the narrow space. The tracheids seen at b, fig. C, are in oblique longitudinal section and are probably being detached to form a leaf-trace. This type of stele may be compared with the steles of Medullosa Solmsi (fig. 416, L) but those of Rhexoxylon differ in the lack of continuity of the secondary xylem round the narrow band of crushed primary xylem. The other steles of the inner ring exhibit the same dual nature though with local modifications. In the stele seen in fig. 438, B, there is a close approach to a continuous cylinder of secondary xylem especially on the right-hand side. External to the inner series are several portions of normally orientated secondary xylem-groups (fig. 437): these probably represent a second series of steles separated from the inner series by a narrow crushed arc of tissue on which the protoxylem strands of the outer groups abut. The xylem of the outer steles agrees in its normal orientation with the outer and smaller part of the inner steles and, as there is no accompanying group of inversely orientated xylem corresponding to the larger mass of secondary xylem of the inner series, the outer strands are designated partial steles. The central stele consists of two curved irregular bands composed of vertically and obliquely running tracheids: the central part of this stele consists of crushed tissue that probably represents primary xylem like that between the two parts of each of the peripheral steles.

Rhexoxylon differs from the usual Medullosan type in the structure of the secondary xylem which is composed of tracheids with an Araucarian form of pitting: there are usually two alternate rows of contiguous pits (fig. 438, A) and occasionally one or three rows. The medullary rays are uniseriate and 3 to 15 cells in depth, a feature characteristic of coniferous wood and not of the wood of the Medulloseae.

In the absence of more complete information as to the anatomical structure of this stem and of all information as to the leaves or reproductive organs it is impossible to fix with precision the systematic position of the genus. It is, however, clear that Rhexoxylon is closely connected with Medullosa in certain features though in the structure of the wood it exhibits important peculiarities. The imperfectly known stem Cladoxylon Kidstoni[408] shows a fairly close agreement with the African plant in the form of the steles (fig. 460) but the pitting is scalariform.

=SUTCLIFFIA.= Scott.

Sutcliffia insignis Scott.

The generic name Sutcliffia was given by Dr Scott[409] to a peculiar type of stem from the Lower Coal Measures of Shore, Lancashire, in recognition of the valuable services rendered to Palaeobotany by the late Mr W. H. Sutcliffe, the owner of the colliery from which several new types of plants have been obtained. Two stems are recorded, the type-specimen and a more recently discovered stem, also from Shore, described by Miss de Fraine[410], which differs in several particulars from Dr Scott’s species. In view of the well-marked peculiarities of the second stem it is convenient to speak of it as forma β instead of including it without a distinctive epithet in Sutcliffia insignis. We know nothing of the reproductive organs of the genus.

1. Sutcliffia insignis, forma α.

This consists of a piece of stem approximately 12 × 7 cm. in diameter characterised by a broad cortex of parenchyma with secretory sacs and ducts and strands of mechanical tissue (fig. 439, A). Decurrent and massive leaf-bases form a prominent feature as in the stem of Medullosa anglica. The stele, though compressed before petrifaction, was probably not quite cylindrical but more or less polygonal or broadly triangular in section; it consists of groups of large primary tracheids (350μ in diameter) with numerous bordered pits (fig. 439, B, and fig. 440) embedded in an anastomosing system of parenchyma containing scattered secretory sacs, a type of protostele like that of Heterangium and Medullosa anglica except in the possession of exarch protoxylem strands. The metaxylem tracheids contiguous to the external protoxylem elements have a dense spiral or scalariform type of pitting. In the lower part of the stem the primary xylem is enclosed by a cambium which has added a few secondary tracheids (120μ in diameter), but in the upper part of the specimen the cambium is only partially developed and the addition of secondary xylem has hardly begun (fig. 440). A narrow band of secondary phloem was recognised in places consisting of small-celled parenchyma with some sieve-tubes and medullary rays continuous internally with the parenchyma of the primary stele. In close association and occasionally in organic connexion with the surface of the stele are several tangentially elongated and large groups of vascular tissue associated with smaller oval strands varying considerably in size. These groups, designated meristeles (Fig. 439, A), are identical in structure with the main stele and are occasionally invested by a feebly developed zone of secondary xylem and phloem. The meristeles are detached at intervals from the parent stele around which they form by anastomoses an irregular network: the larger meristeles give off smaller strands and from these the actual leaf-traces are produced by subdivision. It appears, however, that in this type the meristeles are not completely used up in the production of the leaf-traces, portions of them behaving as cauline vascular strands. A protoxylem of a meristele still attached to the central protostele occupies an internal position, and at a higher level, as separation of the meristele is effected, the spiral tracheids occur on the inner face. New meristeles are given off at intervals from the main stele ‘to compensate for those parts of the reticulum which were used up in the formation of leaf-trace strands[411].’ The meristeles form the starting-point for the leaf-traces, an intermediate system between the main stele and the actual leaf-traces; they differ, therefore, from the parent leaf-traces of Medullosa anglica, which are completely used up by repeated subdivision. Moreover in Sutcliffia the leaf-bundles are concentric and not collateral.

A conspicuous feature of the stem of forma α is the occurrence of two double rows of vascular strands stretching across the cortex (fig. 439, A, a, b). These are interpreted by Scott as downward continuations in the stem of the inner surface of leaf-bases. The outer cortex of the stem and leaf-bases has hypodermal strands of stereome which remain separate or rarely anastomose, and form a superficial zone exactly like that of some species of Medullosa. The leaf-trace bundles may be radially symmetrical or unilateral in the arrangement of the xylem which is in all cases completely surrounded by phloem. Fig. 439, B, shows part of a longitudinal section of a large leaf-trace bundle: spiral protoxylem elements (px) abut on the phloem (ph) and are succeeded to the left by narrow scalariform and large reticulately pitted tracheids. In the larger and radially constructed traces there are several protoxylem-strands distributed over the surface of the xylem, while in the smaller unilateral traces there may be one or two protoxylem strands. A characteristic feature of the xylem of the leaf-traces is the admixture of parenchyma with the tracheids (fig. 439, B, E) and another noteworthy character is the occurrence of large thin-walled tubes in the phloem described by Scott as sieve-tubes and compared with the large sieve-tubes in Marattiaceous leaf-bundles. Immediately internal to the hypoderm is a row of leaf-bundles (fig. 439, A) each of which is accompanied by stereome strands.

The petioles, which reach a diameter of 12 cm., contain numerous, occasionally anastomosing, concentric bundles. Nothing is known of the fronds as a whole beyond the fact that they are spirally disposed and had decurrent bases of large dimensions in proportion to the stem.

Sutcliffia insignis, forma β.

This form, described by Miss de Fraine as Sutcliffia insignis[412], is represented by a stem rather smaller than the type-specimen described by Scott, though it is probably an older example of the same species. It is distinguished by a greater development of secondary xylem and phloem both on the main stele and the meristeles; it differs also in the absence of the greater part of the cortex and leaf-bases which have been cut off as the result of the formation of a deep-seated periderm (fig. 439, D, C). The meristeles are smaller and fewer than in the larger form and are distinguished by some other peculiarities. At m′ in fig. 439, D, a meristele is seen attached to the main stele. In Sutcliffia insignis forma α the main stele is enclosed by an irregular network of subsidiary steles or meristeles and these form the points of departure of the leaf-traces, but the meristeles are not completely used up in the process of conversion into leaf-traces. In Sutcliffia insignis forma β the meristeles agree in structure with the main stele except in the smaller amount of secondary tissue: they do not, however, form a network as in forma α but occur as strands parallel to the central stele, ‘giving off leaf-traces and ultimately dividing up into smaller strands, often unequal in size, the primary wood of the meristeles being entirely used up in the production of radially symmetrical or unilateral bundles.’ In this respect, as Miss de Fraine points out, forma β agrees more closely than forma α with Medullosa anglica and supports Scott’s view that Sutcliffia is a primitive type of Medullosan stem. The leaves were given off at fairly long intervals as in some species of Medullosa: the leaf-traces are exarch and similar to those of the type-species. The most striking feature of the new stem is the presence of a vascular network (fig. 439, D, e) which encloses both the main steles and the meristeles; it consists of extrafascicular strands composed of normally orientated bands of secondary xylem and phloem often assuming a fan-like arrangement and occasionally almost concentric or inversely orientated. These strands are always accompanied by short, usually reticulate, tracheids on the inner margin of the xylem: similar isodiametric tracheids also occur in the pericyclic region. The extrafascicular strands are believed to be secondary structures phylogenetically independent of the meristeles and main stele, comparable with the successive cylinders or arcs of secondary xylem and phloem in some recent Cycads and in some species of Medullosa[413].

The stele is exarch and roughly triangular; except in the broader zone of secondary tissue it agrees with the protostele of forma α. The secondary xylem (fig. 439, C) possesses numerous medullary rays 3–4 cells broad and of considerable depth: the secondary phloem is characterised by the presence of thick-walled elements, presumably sieve-tubes, like those of Medullosa Leuckarti and M. anglica.

The ground-tissue is rich in secretory tissue and the stem-surface, from which the leaf-bases have been detached, is limited by a wide zone of secondary tissue produced by a phellogen.

Sutcliffia Williamsoni (Seward).

1876. Myelopteris (pars) Williamson, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Vol. 166, Pl. +ii.+ figs. 7, 8; Pl. +iv.+ fig. 17. 1893. Rachiopteris Williamsoni Seward, Ann. Bot. Vol. +vii.+ p. 1. 1894. Rachiopteris Williamsoni Seward, ibid. Vol. +viii.+ p. 207, Pl. +xiii.+ 1906. Sutcliffia Williamsoni Scott, Trans. Linn. Soc. Vol. +vii.+ pt +iv.+ p. 62.

In an account of Myelopteris (= Myeloxylon) published in 1876 Williamson included some sections of petioles from the Lower Coal Measures which I afterwards with his concurrence transferred to the genus Rachiopteris as R. Williamsoni. In Rachiopteris Williamsoni the vascular bundles are concentric and not collateral, and are further distinguished from those of Myeloxylon by the association of parenchyma with the tracheids. In the arrangement of the bundles and in the structure of the ground-tissue the petioles of Rachiopteris Williamsoni agree with those of Myeloxylon. An outstanding feature of the vascular strands of the former is the occurrence at fairly regular intervals in the peripheral part of the phloem of comparatively large tubes described by me as secretory canals on the ground that evidence was furnished of their development by the schizogenous separation of cells to form a central canal. The canals were compared with the large sieve-tubes of the Marattiaceae, but with the qualification that ‘their mature form and their manner of development are strongly suggestive of small secretory canals.’ Nothing was known as to the stem which bore these petioles until Scott’s discovery of Sutcliffia with vascular bundles in the cortex and leaf-bases of the same type as those of Rachiopteris Williamsoni. As Scott says, there are a few distinguishing features which suggest that R. Williamsoni is not specifically identical with the petioles of Sutcliffia insignis, though the agreement is such as to justify the substitution of Sutcliffia for Rachiopteris. The tubular elements in the phloem which I considered to be secretory canals are regarded by Scott and Miss de Fraine as sieve-tubes.

Miss de Fraine gives an excellent summary of our knowledge of the genus and discusses, in the light of the additional facts furnished by the second stem, the position of Sutcliffia in a phylogenetic series. The new form strengthens the comparison instituted by Scott between Sutcliffia and Medullosa and gives support to a close connexion between the Medulloseae and the Cycadaceae. Scott lays stress on the fact that the Medulloseae, except Sutcliffia, are polystelic, while the Cycads, at least the adult stems, are monostelic. The views of Worsdell and other botanists who believe that the Medulloseae and the Cycads are intimately related are discussed on another page: in reference to these views Miss de Fraine adds a caveat as to the danger of attaching excessive importance to evidence based on seedling anatomy when we are concerned with broad phylogenetic questions. The stele of a cycadean stem may be derived from a protostelic type such as that of Sutcliffia by the gradual disappearance of the internal tracheids: in Sutcliffia, as in some Cycads and species of Medullosa, extrafascicular strands and cylinders are a characteristic feature and these may well have arisen independently of the central stele in response to physiological requirements. From such a type as Sutcliffia evolution may have proceeded along two lines; in one direction new types were produced in which increasing complexity, as represented by a multiplication of steles, was an outstanding feature. These forms, illustrated by Medullosa anglica and other more elaborate species, proved inefficient and were unproductive. Along another line the protostelic condition was maintained though in some cases extrafascicular strands or cylinders and cortical steles were superadded: it was this line that led to the recent Cycads.

_General considerations suggested by the anatomical features of_ Medullosa.

A comparison of the stems described under the generic name Medullosa reveals a considerable range in the grosser anatomical features superadded to certain fundamental characters denoting a common origin[414]. If additional data were available giving us a fuller knowledge of individual plants differences between species would be more clearly defined and would provide adequate grounds for the institution of new genera for some of the types now included in the comprehensive genus Medullosa. A proposal by Dr Lotsy[415] to adopt the names Pecopteromedullosa and Neuropteromedullosa rests primarily on the relatively unimportant difference between the fronds associated with certain Medullosan stems and, as Scott[416] points out, this two-fold division if applied to such a species as Medullosa Leuckarti would result in its separation from species which anatomically are clearly of the same generic type. In Medullosa anglica, one of the oldest and simplest types, there are three steles of equal importance, and each of them is practically identical with the single stele of Heterangium. Each stele—as indeed all Medullosan steles—consists of a strand of primary xylem enclosed by secondary xylem and phloem, and it is obvious that the development of a constantly increasing cylinder of secondary conducting tissue about three centres would lead to serious mechanical difficulty: a stem constructed on the plan of Medullosa anglica or the smaller M. pusilla could not increase the thickness of its secondary vascular tissue beyond a certain point without detriment to its efficiency. In some types this difficulty is partially overcome by the production of complete concentric cylinders of centrifugally developed conducting tissue external to an inner system of concentric steles agreeing individually with those of Heterangium (fig. 415, B). Medullosa anglica, regarded from the point of view of the architectural efficiency of its vascular system, affords a much less promising point d’appui for further evolution than some of the forms described under Medullosa stellata in which the mechanical impasse is avoided by the adoption of the cycadean plan as represented by such genera as Cycas and Macrozamia. The English species Medullosa centrofilis (fig. 417) affords the first example of a characteristic Medullosan feature, namely the presence of a small concentric stele in the central region of the stem: this so-called star-ring differs not only in its smaller dimensions but in its more cylindrical form from the larger peripheral steles. In the later Permian species, e.g. Medullosa porosa and M. Solmsi, the single star-ring of the older M. centrofilis is replaced by a large number of precisely similar conducting strands. These star-rings are structurally comparable with the cortical steles of Cycas and, in position, with the medullary system of bundles in a Macrozamia; they are essentially cauline and take no part in the emission of leaf-traces. Medullosa Leuckarti (fig. 416, H) resembles in its vascular plan M. centrofilis, but in this larger stem there are several star-rings and the enlarged peripheral steles are more or less sinuous. In Medullosa Solmsi (fig. 416, E) the star-rings are still more numerous and the main vascular system consists of a double series of concentric steles, each agreeing with the larger peripheral steles of M. Leuckarti.

Some of the forms included in Medullosa stellata appear to be very different from M. anglica and M. Leuckarti (cf. fig. 416, F, A, H), but their similarity is apparent if we imagine Medullosa anglica with only one main stele (with the addition of star-rings) which is stretched tangentially until it becomes a long and narrow plate-ring and is then rolled into a hollow cylinder like that in fig. 416, D. A modification of the tubular type of stele is seen in Medullosa stellata var. corticata (fig. 416, G) in which the vascular cylinder is broken up into two or more curved plate-rings, a change superficially similar to that by which a dictyostele is produced from a solenostele, but in Medullosa it is not the overlapping of leaf-gaps that is the cause of the change. A striking feature in the stem of Medullosa stellata represented in fig. 416, D and F (especially F), is the inequality in breadth of the centrifugal and centripetal xylem: this inequality is an expression of the difficulty caused by the presence of an internal as well as an external addition of secondary conducting tissue. A limit is set to the production of secondary centripetal xylem by the space available for extension, whereas there is unlimited room for increase in the case of the centrifugal tissue. This tendency to a greater development of xylem and phloem on the outer side of the primary portion of the steles is illustrated also in M. Solmsi var. lignosa (fig. 416, L) where the outer of the two series of peripheral steles has a much larger proportion of centrifugal xylem. In M. anglica the secondary xylem on the inner side of the steles is not infrequently broader than the corresponding tissue on the abaxial side[417]; but this is exceptional in the genus. A further development of centrifugal conducting tissue without any corresponding development of centripetal tissue is effected in certain cases (fig. 416, K, L) by the addition of concentric cylinders of centrifugal xylem and phloem beyond the original concentric steles. The type illustrated by Medullosa Solmsi var. lignosa and M. stellata var. gigantea (fig. 416, L, K) at once suggests comparison with stems of Cycas, Macrozamia, and Encephalartos, the chief difference being the presence in Medullosa of an inner series of concentric steles and a central ground-tissue containing star-rings, though the latter may be regarded as corresponding to the medullary system of bundles in Macrozamia. In Macrozamia the central region of the stem is considered to be the pith of a monostelic stem, whereas in Medullosa the stem is polystelic. In recent cycadean stems it is not uncommon to find patches of inversely orientated xylem and phloem internal to one or more of the cylinders of centrifugal vascular tissue. These abnormal developments are considered by Worsdell[418] to be relics of the inner portions of concentric steles possessed by the Medullosan ancestors of recent Cycads. This interpretation affords a means of bringing into closer relationship the polystelic Medulloseae and the monostelic Cycadaceae, the apparent simplicity of the latter being the result of the progressive loss of centripetal xylem and phloem, the normal cycadean cylinder being therefore regarded as a one-sided remnant of a concentric Medullosan stele. In other words, the Cycads are descended from polystelic ancestors. As further evidence in support of this view Worsdell points to the occurrence of concentric steles in the cortex of Cycas and their occasional presence in the pith of other genera. Matte[419] has shown that in the seedling stem of Encephalartos Barteri (fig. 396, K) there are three concentric steles each similar to a normal Medullosan stele: at a higher level in the axis the steles become ‘unrolled’ and assume the form of one-sided cylinders of centrifugal xylem and phloem.

In the peduncles of some recent Cycads, e.g. Stangeria, there is a tendency towards a somewhat irregular orientation of the collateral bundles that constitute the vascular cylinder, and tracheids occasionally occur internal to the protoxylem of the individual bundles[420]. Worsdell regards these features as evidence of a Medullosan ancestry. If the sinuous plate-rings of a stem of Medullosa Leuckarti (fig. 416, H) were broken up into separate portions and wholly or in part deprived of the centripetal xylem, the result would be an arrangement of bundles comparable with that in a Stangeria peduncle[421]. The scattered centripetal tracheids discovered by Scott in Stangeria and other cycadean peduncles are interpreted by Scott and by Worsdell as relics of some ancestral centripetal xylem, but with this important difference in the point of view; Scott believes that they represent the almost completely aborted centripetal xylem of a single stele like that of Lyginopteris, while Worsdell sees in them fragmentary vestiges of the central primary xylem of two or more Medullosan steles. An abnormal seedling of Araucaria Bidwillii described by Shaw[422] exhibits features analogous to those in some cycadean seedlings: within the normal stele a cambium forms an inversely orientated vascular cylinder which at a lower level becomes continuous with the outer centrifugal tissue, the whole vascular system being eventually represented by two concentric steles. The polystelic stage is a development of a monostelic condition, and the inner or inverted portion of each of the two concentric steles is derived from an inversely orientated cylinder in the central region of the root. This abnormal root does not, however, supply an argument in favour of the derivation of a monostelic type of stem from one that was polystelic, but it shows a close relation between the two plans in one organ. The seedling is not altogether normal in form apart from structure and it is not improbable that the anatomical abnormality is connected with some pathological cause.

It has been suggested[423] that Worsdell attaches too much phylogenetic significance to the irregularities in the disposition and form of the vascular bundles in the peduncle of Stangeria, and the criticism that insufficient allowance is made for the possible reaction on structure of the special physiological requirements of reproductive shoots is well founded. Granting an overestimate of the arguments drawn from the occasional occurrence of concentric vascular strands, a considerable body of evidence remains in favour of Worsdell’s main contention.

Mrs Thoday[424] has drawn attention to certain features exhibited by the inflorescence-axes of Welwitschia, particularly the occurrence of concentric and inversely orientated bundles, similar to those characteristic of the seedling of Cycas siamensis[425] described by Matte, and to anatomical characters occasionally present in adult cycadean stems and normally represented in Medullosa. She is of opinion that the occurrence in Welwitschia of certain Medullosan features has a phylogenetic significance. The differences between the Gnetales, Medulloseae, and Cycadales are considerable, and it would seem unlikely that the anatomical resemblances described by Mrs Thoday are of great value as criteria of close relationship. The comparison of Lagenostoma with gnetalean seeds is alluded to elsewhere. To the statement that the presence of concentric and inversely orientated steles in Welwitschia are reminiscent of the polystelic Medulloseae, Mrs Thoday adds the qualifying remark that the occurrence of four concentric groups of vascular tissue in the hypocotyl of Welwitschia is not sufficient to justify the conclusion that the ancestral type was polystelic. This reservation accords with the contention of Scott and other botanists, that the occasional occurrence in cycadean seedlings and adult stems of anatomical features suggestive of polystely does not in itself furnish an adequate reason for doubting that the apparent monostely of Cycads is phylogenetically what it seems to be, namely, an indication of monostelic ancestry. This brings us to the question of a possible monostelic ancestor. It may be that the Upper Carboniferous genus Sutcliffia affords a clue to the problem of the origin of the polystelic type illustrated in various forms by Medullosa. The protostele of Sutcliffia bears a close resemblance to each of the three steles of Medullosa anglica; the fact that Sutcliffia is exarch and that Medullosa anglica has mesarch xylem is of secondary importance, particularly as exarchy is represented within the genus Medullosa. The extrafascicular strands of xylem and phloem and the accessory strands are points in which Sutcliffia and Medullosa anglica agree and, as Miss de Fraine[426] adds, the meristeles of Sutcliffia may be homologous with the leaf-trace strands of Medullosa. Scott[427] gave expression to the characters shared by these two types by describing Sutcliffia as the most primitive of the Medulloseae. It is suggested that the protostelic axis of Sutcliffia may be regarded as the starting-point of the monostelic Cycads, the central mass of tracheal tissue being replaced by a parenchymatous pith, while the extrafascicular and accessory strands arose independently of the central stele in response to increased physiological demands consequent on the increase in size of the stem. From the same starting-point evolution may have progressed along another line through such a type as Medullosa anglica leading to the more complex Permian species of Medullosa. Chodat’s view[428] that the Medulloseae are Protocycadaceae, if we include Sutcliffia as well as Medullosa in the Medulloseae, is probably correct. There is clear evidence of a close bond of union between recent Cycads and the Medulloseae, and Sutcliffia offers a possible means of deriving complex polystelic types from a monostelic ancestor.

Worsdell’s opinion[429] that the stele of Lyginopteris affords evidence of derivation from a polystelic ancestor and is not homologous with the true monostele of Heterangium is opposed to the undoubted signs of intimate connexion exhibited by these genera. The Lyginopterideae are, as Scott[430] says, a less advanced group than the Medulloseae and, it may be added, they are more remote from the modern representatives of the Cycadales. The Lyginopterideae and the Medulloseae are probably offshoots of a common stock, but the Medulloseae occupy a position farther removed from the filicinean ancestry than Heterangium and Lyginopteris[431].

The relative meagreness of our knowledge of the reproductive organs of the Medulloseae gives precedence to anatomical data in phylogenetic considerations, but the evidence furnished by Trigonocarpus and other seeds that may fairly be assigned to Medullosan plants is in harmony with the conclusions based on vegetative characters with regard to a close affinity between the Medulloseae and Cycads.

The comparative examination of recent Cycads naturally suggested by any attempt to compare the group as a whole with Palaeozoic types leads to some apparently contradictory results. The habit of the megasporophyll of Cycas is usually quoted as a primitive attribute: the close resemblance in plan and in manner of occurrence on the stem between megasporophylls and foliage leaves recalls both Ferns and Medullosan fronds. On the other hand the production of eight body-cells in the pollen-tube of Microcycas[432] in place of the usual single cell may also be regarded as a primitive character. It is perhaps possible, as Miss Dorety[433] says, that the polyspermy may be a case of recurrence and not a direct inheritance. Microcycas differs from Cycas in having only one vascular cylinder, and if the presence of several concentric cylinders in Cycas be interpreted as an indication of a closer connexion with a Medullosan ancestry, the Microcycas type would represent a more advanced stage in evolution. Attempts to arrange plants according to a natural sequence are frequently frustrated by instances of unequal progress in the development of vegetative and reproductive organs; one or other set of members lags behind; some characters point to the retention of primitive traits while others indicate a marked progressive tendency. It is noteworthy that the Mesozoic Bennettitales are characterised by a greater simplicity of stem-structure than is the rule in recent Cycads, and both in their vegetative features and in the structure of the seeds they are further removed from the Medullosan type.

II. A. =STELOXYLEAE.=

=Steloxylon.= Solms-Laubach.

Steloxylon Ludwigii (Goeppert and Stenzel). The genus is founded on a piece of stem from Siberia, possibly of Permian age though not improbably older, which was originally described as Medullosa Ludwigii[434]. It is characterised by numerous cylindrical and band-like vascular strands forming an irregular anastomosing system (fig. 441, B) and by crowded spiral leaf-scars on the exposed face. The appearance presented by the transverse section figured by these authors, while suggesting comparison with Medullosa, reveals a distinctive character, namely the absence of a definite peripheral system of vascular rings such as forms a striking feature of the continental Medulloseae. A more complete description was afterwards published by Schenk[435] who recognised more fully the peculiar features and hinted at the possibility that the species might more appropriately be regarded as a member of a distinct group. Solms-Laubach[436] went a step further and instituted the generic name Steloxylon, and in a later publication gave a fuller account of the anatomical characters. The complete stem must have reached a diameter of approximately 13 cm. The homogeneous ground-tissue forms a matrix enclosing an anastomosing vascular system of cylindrical or oval steles (fig. 441, C). Each strand consists of a band of secondary xylem tracheids with one or several rows of circular or oval bordered pits on the radial walls and narrow medullary rays usually 1–2 cells broad and 1–4 cells deep, though occasionally deeper. No phloem is preserved. The tissue in the centre of each stele is very imperfectly preserved, but it is clear that the secondary xylem enclosed a central region (‘partial pith’) like that in the steles of a Medullosa, doubtless consisting of primary xylem and conjunctive parenchyma.

The stem is covered with leaf-bases of oval or circular section and between them are small organs, probably multicellular hairs (fig. 441, A). A leaf-base consists of an outer zone of strengthening tissue and a parenchymatous ground-tissue traversed by two or more small vascular strands which assume various forms. These petiolar strands are simply portions of the main vascular system which bend outwards at the periphery of the anastomosing network. The more noteworthy features in which Steloxylon differs from Medullosa, particularly such species as M. stellata and M. Leuckarti, are (i) the crowded and comparatively small leaf-bases in place of the massive decurrent petioles of Medullosa; (ii) the supply of the leaves by compact branches of the stelar network instead of the bundles detached as leaf-traces from a stem-stele of Medullosa (the origin of a leaf-trace in Steloxylon is shown in fig. 441, C); (iii) the absence of a peripheral system of vascular plate-rings and the irregular distribution of cylindrical and plate-steles in the ground-tissue. Nothing is known of the reproductive organs or leaves beyond the structure of the attached leaf-bases. The opinion expressed by P. Bertrand[437] that the fossil described by Stenzel as Asterochlaena (Clepsydropsis) kirgisica is the petiole of Steloxylon was abandoned after the additional facts published by Solms-Laubach.

As regards the affinities of Steloxylon: the structure of the steles agrees closely with that of the star- and plate-rings of a Medullosa, while the pitting of the tracheids is more like that in Medullosa than Cladoxylon. In the tendency to a more radial than tangential disposition of the band-like steles Steloxylon recalls Cladoxylon rather than Medullosa, but in Cladoxylon the vascular system does not form an irregular network as in Steloxylon. The information as to the structure of the primary xylem is very meagre, but it points to a closer connexion with Medullosa than with Cladoxylon. On the whole Steloxylon may perhaps be defined as a genus allied to the Medulloseae in the anatomical features of the stem more closely than to other genera, but sufficiently distinct to be excluded from the Medulloseae as at present understood[438].

Spotted a typo or a problem in this chapter? Tell us

Chapter XXXI

PTERIDOSPERMS REPRESENTED BY SEED-BEARING LEAVES ONLY OR LEAVES IN CONSTANT ASSOCIATION WITH SEEDS.

Before describing other genera represented by petrified vegetative organs exhibiting in their anatomical features points of contact with the Medulloseae, a short account is intercalated of some imperfectly known seed-bearing fronds and seeds belonging to the Pteridosperms but which do not afford sufficient data to admit of their reference to a more precise position in a natural classification.

Pecopteris Pluckeneti (Schlotheim).

In the section in Volume +ii.+ devoted to the genus Pecopteris reference was made to the species P. Pluckeneti[439], further treatment being deferred until other Pteridosperms had been described. The fern-like fronds originally described by Schlotheim as Filicites Pluckeneti[440] and afterwards transferred by Brongniart and other authors to Pecopteris[441] are now recognised as the leaves of a Pteridosperm. Some doubt has been expressed as to the specific identity of the specimens figured by Schlotheim and Brongniart respectively, but Potonié’s examination of the type-specimen of the earlier author convinced him that Brongniart’s leaves were correctly named. The large fronds of Pecopteris Pluckeneti are characterised by the bifurcation of the principal axis which bears opposite pairs of bi- or tri-pinnate branches and in the angles of the bifurcations of the rachis undeveloped buds occur on prolongations of the axis, a habit recalling recent species of Gleichenia[442] (figs. 225 and 226, vol. +ii.+). The variation in the form of the pinnules is shown in fig. 442, A, which represents both the apical portion and parts of pinnae 10 cm. lower on the rachis of a large leaf from the Coal Measures of Radstock. The species is characteristic of the Upper Coal Measures and is recorded also from Permian strata. In 1883 Sterzel adopted for this species the generic name Dicksonites because of the occurrence of shallow circular cups at the end of the lowest lateral vein on some of the pinnules which he believed to be sori of the Cyatheaceous type. The cups have an involute margin and occasionally a small scar in the centre (fig. 442, B). Stur[443] declined to accept Sterzel’s evidence as satisfactory and suggested a fungal origin for the sorus-like impressions, a view, as Sterzel objected, that is rendered improbable by the constant position of the single cups on several pinnules. The nature of Sterzel’s ‘sori’ has not been demonstrated: it is suggested by Grand’Eury[444] that they mark the position of microsporangia. Some seed-bearing specimens in Dr Kidston’s collection show cups, like those figured by Sterzel, on pinnules from which the seeds have fallen, and it is not improbable that they are the scars of seeds. In 1905 Grand’Eury published a description and photographs of specimens of P. Pluckeneti from the St Étienne coal-field showing hundreds of well-preserved seeds, many of them attached to pinnules characterised by a very slightly reduced lamina. Some fronds were found to be entirely fertile, while others bore both sterile and fertile pinnae. The smallest seeds, 5 mm. long and 3 mm. broad, were found at the tips of unexpanded leaves: the mature seeds, only slightly larger, agree in their broadly oval form and narrow marginal ‘wing’ with small examples of Samaropsis[445]. The seeds were figured by Grand’Eury[446] in an earlier work as Carpolithes granulatus. They are believed to have hung free from the lamina, a conclusion based on the position of the seeds relative to the plane of the pinnule in well-preserved examples. Prof. Zeiller informs me that he is by no means certain that Grand’Eury’s seed-bearing fronds should not be referred to Pecopteris Sterzeli; but as that species and P. Pluckeneti are very closely allied forms and may well have borne the same general type of fructification, the question of specific difference does not affect the significance of Grand’Eury’s discovery. A statement was made in vol. +ii.+[447], quoted from Grand’Eury, that the fronds of P. Sterzeli were borne on a Psaronius stem, but Prof. Zeiller told me that in his opinion the fronds and stem are merely in association and not in organic contact. It is probable that the Psaronius stem bore fronds of some species of Pecopteris with sori of the Asterotheca or Scolecopteris type and not seeds. Pecopteris Pluckeneti and P. Sterzeli are no doubt the fronds of a Pteridosperm[448], but apart from the seed-impressions there is no evidence as to the nature of the reproductive organs or stem. The form of the seeds with a fairly thick sarcotesta, which gives them a winged appearance, suggests a member of the Medulloseae rather than a plant with seeds like those of Lyginopteris and Heterangium.

Eremopteris artemisaefolia Steinberg with Samaropsis acuta Lindley and Hutton.

The generic name Eremopteris was instituted by Schimper for a type of frond from the Coal Measures of Newcastle described by Sternberg as Sphenopteris artemisaefolia. He included also a second species, E. Neesii, from the Permian of Bohemia: this was removed by Zeiller to Callipteris. The type-species of Eremopteris is included in this chapter on the ground that the almost constant association with the fronds of seeds comparable with those described by White as Aneimites (Wardia) fertilis affords a strong argument in favour of assigning Eremopteris artemisaefolia to the Pteridosperms.

1826. Sphenopteris artemisaefolia Steinberg, Flor. Vorwelt, Fasc. +iv.+ p. 15, Pl. +lvi.+ fig. 1. 1833. Sphenopteris crithmifolia Lindley and Hutton, Foss. Flor. Vol. +i.+ Pl. +xlvi.+ 1833. Cardiocarpon acutum, Ibid. Pl. +lxxvi.+ 1869. Eremopteris artemisaefolia Schimper, Trait. Pal. Vég. Vol. +i.+ p. 416. 1914. Samaropsis acuta Kidston, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Vol. +l.+ Pt +i.+ p. 156.

The large compound fronds of this species[449] are characterised by the regular dichotomy of the main branches, a feature frequently met with in Palaeozoic fern-like leaves: the cuneate or oval-cuneiform pinnules (fig. 443, A, C) vary considerably in breadth from the typical cuneate type of segment as figured by Brongniart[450] to narrow, almost linear, leaflets like those of Sphenopteris crithmifolia. Several spreading veins traverse the lamina. Lindley and Hutton, while admitting a very close resemblance between their species and S. artemisaefolia, adopted a distinctive name. The only evidence so far obtained as to the stem of the plant is furnished by some specimens in the Hutton collection (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) one of which shows a piece of rhizome bearing several petioles (fig. 443, B): there are no pinnules attached to the rachises but some occur in close association. Brongniart noticed the frequent association of Eremopteris fronds with small seeds, but he regarded it as accidental. Dr Kidston[451] has recently drawn attention to a note by Prof. Duns published in 1872 on the juxtaposition of seeds and fronds, and Mr Howse[452] in his Catalogue of the Hutton plants considers that the seeds were borne on the Eremopteris leaves; in his synonymy of E. artemisaefolia he includes Cardiocarpon acutum Lind. and Hutt. as the ‘spore-cases or sporangia.’ The Eremopteris seeds are of the platyspermic (Samaropsis) type, broadly oval and about 7 mm. long with an obtuse base and two slightly divergent acute processes at the apex (fig. 444). Some specimens in Dr Kidston’s collection from the Lower Coal Measures of Midlothian, which were associated with Eremopteris fronds, are preserved as mummified cuticular membranes and on microscopical examination they show clearly the presence of a pollen-chamber. The seeds are of the Samaropsis type. The drawings reproduced in fig. 444 were made for me by Dr Kidston from two specimens, in his collection, of exceptionally well-preserved seeds from Midlothian: the seeds of this species vary considerably in size and form; some are almost orbicular and show no distinction between nucule and border (fig. 444, A) while in others (B) the impression of the flattened and longitudinally striated sarcotesta is clearly distinguished. Kidston is of opinion that in younger seeds there is a single apical point replaced in a later stage of development by two cusps, as seen in figs. A and B, formed by the opening of the micropylar tube. A ridge in the middle of the flattened surface indicates the position of the vascular bundles in the principal plane as in Cardiocarpus. The fully developed seeds are 8–9 mm. long. The correlation of the seeds represented in figs. 443 and 444 with Eremopteris fronds furnishes an additional illustration of the impossibility of trusting to external form as a criterion of affinity, for it is known that seeds of the Samaropsis type were produced by Pteridosperms with foliage represented by Eremopteris artemisaefolia and Pecopteris Pluckeneti, also by some members of the Cordaitales (e.g. fig. 480). Dr Arber[453] has recently proposed a new generic name Cornucarpus for Cardiocarpon acutum, but the drawings that he gives of seeds from the Kent coal-field referred to this species suggest a type distinct from that of Lindley and Hutton. In the absence of specimens showing actual attachment it is impossible to say how the seeds were borne, but the analogy of Wardia fertilis and Pecopteris Pluckeneti lends support to the view that the seeds were attached to pinnules with a reduced lamina. Eremopteris artemisaefolia occurs in the Lower and Middle Coal Measures of England: a species recorded by Kidston from the Calciferous sandstone of Scotland as E. Macconochii[454] is now believed by that author to be generically distinct[455]. With the exception of the unsatisfactory specimen reproduced in fig. 443, B, we have no information with regard to the habit of the stem to which the Eremopteris leaves were attached.

=WARDIA.= White.

Wardia fertilis (White). Another example of a fern-like frond bearing seeds is afforded by specimens from the Lower Pottsville series of Virginia (correlated with the Millstone grit of British geologists) described by Mr David White[456] as Aneimites (Wardia) fertilis. The compound fronds usually referred to the genus Adiantides or Adiantites[457] are characterised by cuneate pinnules with a thin lamina and forked, slightly divergent veins (fig. 445, A, D). White discards the name Adiantides in favour of Dawson’s genus Aneimites on the ground that Goeppert[458], who instituted the former term, applied it in the first instance to leaves of Ginkgo which he identified as simple Fern fronds. In spite of this misapplication of the name it has been constantly used and is well established. The discovery of seeds is, however, a reason for the adoption of a new generic name, and as White proposed Wardia for the seeds it may appropriately be extended to the fronds in place of the provisional term Aneimites. The seeds which occur at the apices of slender pedicels on pinnae bearing relatively small pinnules with a reduced lamina (fig. 445, B, C) are rhomboidal in shape, 4·5 mm. long and 2·5 mm. broad. The bilaterally symmetrical seeds were probably enclosed, as White suggests, in a fleshy integument which on pressure became laterally extended as a wing-like border. In some of the seeds there is an indication of a ‘slight collapse within the apex of the nutlet,’ which may mean the presence of a pollen-chamber; but while the preservation is too imperfect to afford any decisive evidence as to anatomical features, there is no reason to doubt the conclusion as to the seed-nature of the organs described by White. Nothing is known of the stem, though the opinion may be hazarded that Wardia is a member of the Medulloseae.

Adiantites bellidulus Heer and Lagenospermum Arberi Nathorst.

Reference is made to the genus Lagenospermum in the account of Lagenostoma[459]. The species Lagenospermum Arberi has recently been founded by Dr Nathorst[460] on some seeds obtained from Lower Carboniferous rocks in Spitzbergen: a brief description is intercalated here because it is probable that they were borne on fronds of the Adiantites type similar to those on which White found the seeds described by him as Wardia. The seeds of L. Arberi, 14–18 × 5 mm., are spindle-shaped with an obtuse apex and longitudinally ribbed with a stalk at least 7 mm. long. Nathorst considers that a cupule was probably present: the specimens do not convey the impression of naked seeds and in some examples there are indications of an investing envelope, though this may be the result of tearing of the testa. Nathorst regards the Spitzbergen seeds as probably specifically identical with a specimen described by Schmalhausen[461] from Carboniferous rocks in the Urals as Rhabdocarpus orientalis Eich., a species which agrees closely with Lagenospermum nitidulum as described by Heer[462] (under the name Carpolithes nitidulus) and Nathorst[463] from Spitzbergen. It is also possible that Kidston’s Rhabdocarpus elongatus[464], from the Lanarkshire coal-field and elsewhere, recently transferred by Arber[465] to Platyspermum, is an example of the same species. The chief interest of Lagenospermum lies in the fact, assuming Nathorst’s correlation of the seeds with Adiantites bellidulus Heer to be correct, that it is a typical radiospermic seed, while Wardia, borne on foliage of the same general type, is an equally typical platyspermic seed.

Spotted a typo or a problem in this chapter? Tell us

XXXII. CYCADOFILICES

In this chapter are included several types represented by stems, but which in the absence of definite information with regard to the reproductive organs cannot be assigned to the Pteridosperms.

=MEGALOXYLEAE.=

=Megaloxylon.= Seward.

This genus is represented by a single species founded on a piece of stem from the Lower Coal Measures of Lancashire discovered in the Binney Collection in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge[466]. Nothing is known as to the leaves, reproductive organs, or roots. The type-specimen consists exclusively of primary and secondary xylem.

Megaloxylon Scotti Seward.

The type-specimen, reproduced natural size in fig. 446, A, B, consists of a fragment of stem which at first sight bears a close resemblance to Cordaites, but the apparent pith, 1·9 cm. in diameter, is the primary xylem of the stele and is enclosed by an incomplete cylinder of secondary xylem 2 cm. broad. The distinction between the lighter primary xylem and the darker secondary cylinder is especially well marked in the longitudinal section (fig. 446, B). The central region, shown on a larger scale in fig. 447, is occupied by groups of tracheids varying in size and shape associated with thin-walled parenchyma: the latter is represented by lighter patches in the section. The majority of the tracheids are characterised by their great breadth—in some cases ·4 mm.—and their isodiametric or even horizontally elongated and flattened form. Some of these large metaxylem elements are seen in longitudinal section at m in fig. 448 where the shrinkage and partial decay of the parenchymatous tissue have resulted in the separation of transverse bands of xylem simulating the discoid pith of a Cordaites. The walls of these tracheal cells are covered with multiseriate pits. With the short and sometimes flattened xylem elements occur others of greater length, but these are chiefly met with in the more peripheral part of the central region where some of the tracheids are much narrower and have the form of ordinary water-conducting elements. On one side of the primary xylem in fig. 447 an oval and more compact group of narrow and longer tracheids is seen at lt¹; this is a leaf-trace about to enter the secondary-xylem cylinder on its outward course. The same leaf-trace is shown at lt in fig. 446, B; as it descends the trace becomes less distinct and its elongated elements gradually merge into the general mass of metaxylem. A portion of this leaf-trace is seen in fig. 448, B, lt, close to the inner edge of the secondary xylem, x², and abutting internally on the contracted tissue, m, which consists mainly of large and short tracheae with remains of associated parenchyma. The trace includes some conjunctive parenchyma interspersed with the tracheids: on its outer surface, that is on the abaxial edge of the ovate xylem strand as shown at lt¹ in fig. 447, there are six external protoxylem strands. In the peripheral region of the primary xylem of the section reproduced in fig. 447 there are several more or less well-defined leaf-traces, e.g. lt², lt³; these differ from that seen at lt¹ in their greater tangential breadth and in the less compact arrangement of the tracheids. As each trace is followed downwards in the primary region of the stele it tends to become broader, especially in a tangential direction; the spiral protoxylem strands are more widely separated (fig. 448, A, px) and the elongated and comparatively narrow tracheids as they spread out fan-wise are reduced in length, finally passing over into the broad and short reticulately pitted cells. Each leaf-trace can be followed through approximately four internodes before its individuality is lost in the general mass of metaxylem. The disposition of the peripheral traces is such as to justify the conclusion that the phyllotaxis of the stem is ⅖.[467]

The secondary xylem (fig. 446, C) resembles that of Lyginopteris and Heterangium though it is less parenchymatous. The medullary rays are numerous and vary in breadth from 1 to 5 cells, while the tracheids, with multiseriate bordered pits on their radial walls, form bands 1 to 8 elements in breadth. There are no regular rings of growth but occasional arcs of narrow tracheids interfere slightly with the otherwise uniform structure of the wood. A leaf-trace in its oblique outward course through the wood becomes completely enclosed by a cylinder of secondary xylem and thus appears to be concentric. Owing to the absence of any tissue external to the secondary xylem of the stem, statements as to the subsequent behaviour of the leaf-traces on emerging from the stele are purely hypothetical. It is, however, not improbable that each concentric trace lost its secondary tissue and broke up into several collateral strands, a suggestion based on the behaviour of the leaf-traces in Medullosa anglica.

The most striking characteristics of Megaloxylon are: (i) the structure of the primary xylem, particularly the unusual form of the majority of the metaxylem tracheids, a form obviously correlated with storage rather than with conduction of water; (ii) the gradual spreading of the leaf-traces and their absorption as they descend into the main mass of the xylem; (iii) the exarch structure of the primary xylem. Confining our attention to the primary region of the stele; a comparison is at once suggested with Heterangium. In Megaloxylon the peculiarities are the substitution of the large storage-tracheids for the normal xylem-elements; the greater irregularity in the groups of metaxylem; and an exarch instead of a mesarch structure. In these last features the primary xylem agrees with that of recent species of the Schizaeaceous Fern Lygodium and the external protoxylem is a character shared with Rhetinangium. The occurrence of short tracheids similar to those of Megaloxylon in the inner portion of the stele of the Osmundaceous Fern Zalesskya gracilis (Eich.)[468] may be quoted as an example of parallel modification but, as Scott[469] points out, the resemblance has no phylogenetic significance. The secondary xylem though less parenchymatous than in recent Cycads agrees more closely with the manoxylic than with the pycnoxylic type.

Megaloxylon affords an interesting example of a combination of primary stelar anatomical features, comparable in the exarch position of the protoxylem with the stele of Lygodium, and secondary wood similar to that of Lyginopteris and Heterangium. The large metaxylem tracheids may be regarded as derivatives of elements which in some ancestral type were structurally fitted for the rôle of water-transport and made up the xylem of a Lygodium-like stele with little or no secondary xylem. As the cambial activity increased and centrifugal xylem became a prominent feature, usurping the function of the centripetal xylem, the latter became modified and fitted for a new service.

=RHETINANGIEAE.=

=Rhetinangium.= Gordon.

Rhetinangium Arberi Gordon.

The stem on which this genus is founded was discovered by Dr Gordon[470] in the Calciferous Sandstone series of Pettycur: a specimen collected by Dr Kidston in Berwickshire may be specifically identical with the Pettycur plant. We know nothing of the leaves or reproductive organs of Rhetinangium. The stem, approximately 2 cm. in diameter, was probably cylindrical; it possesses a single stele consisting mainly of a central primary region occupied by anastomosing groups of tracheids, 130–150μ in diameter, embedded in parenchyma containing numerous secretory sacs and ducts. In the peripheral region of the stele the groups of tracheids consist of narrower elements characterised by exarch protoxylem. Each peripheral group forms the base of a wedge of secondary xylem (fig. 450, x²), the primary medullary rays being in direct connexion with some of the parenchyma of the primary xylem. The secondary tracheids, 45–85μ in diameter, have multiseriate bordered pits on their radial walls and the rays are broad and deep as in Heterangium and Lyginopteris. With the exception of the external position of the protoxylem, the stele of Rhetinangium is practically identical with that of Heterangium, though in Rhetinangium the primary tracheids form larger and fewer groups. The inner cortex is composed of thin-walled cells with many secretory sacs: there are no stereome elements. In the outer cortex (fig. 449, cr) radially disposed bands of stereome form a reticulum with narrow and very long meshes like that of Medullosan petioles.

The recently recorded occurrence of polydesmic petioles[471] in Heterangium is of special interest from the point of view of the comparison of that genus with Rhetinangium and the Medulloseae.

The very broad decurrent petiole-bases are a striking feature, the major diameter of the pulvinus-like base of the leaf-stalk exceeding that of the stem (fig. 449, p). Several xylem-strands from the peripheral region of the primary xylem go to form a single leaf-trace: these U-shaped strands of xylem destined for a leaf are connected laterally by parenchyma and form an irregularly corrugated band. Fig. 450 shows a petiole-trace still enclosed on each side by the secondary xylem cylinder x².

There are several protoxylem groups in a leaf-trace, one on the outer face of each xylem-strand. In the petiole the xylem groups are more intimately connected and the trace has the form of a flat band with abaxial protoxylem. There is no indication that a leaf-trace undergoes division into separate strands. The roots are described as tetrarch with well-developed secondary xylem.

The primary xylem of Rhetinangium agrees in its exarch structure with the Palaeozoic genera Sutcliffia, Megaloxylon and Stenomyelon, also with Lygodium and some other recent Ferns: the secondary wood is of the manoxylic type like that of Lyginopteris, Heterangium and other genera. In the general structure of the stele Rhetinangium agrees with Sutcliffia and, except in the exarch structure of the primary xylem, with the steles of Heterangium and Medullosa anglica[472]; but the structure and origin of the leaf-traces are characters which mark it off from Sutcliffia. The sclerenchymatous bands in the inner cortex of Heterangium are unrepresented in Rhetinangium, and in the latter genus the abundance of secretory sacs and ducts is a characteristic feature, moreover in Rhetinangium, the leaf-trace consists of several groups of primary xylem-elements. Dr Gordon regards Megaloxylon as the type which comes nearest to Rhetinangium; but the differences in the structure of the secondary wood and the marked contrast between the leaf-traces are too pronounced to justify a preference for Megaloxylon over Heterangium in the order of affinity. Gordon considers that the undivided leaf-trace of Rhetinangium may represent a form transitional between the simple leaf-trace of Lyginopteris and the much divided type in Medullosa. The external position of the protoxylem is a character to which too much weight may easily be attached: the difference in position between the protoxylem of Rhetinangium and Heterangium is in some examples of the latter genus hardly perceptible. Kubart[473] speaks of the stele of his species Heterangium Sturi as being almost exarch. The inconstancy in the position of the protoxylem in the xylem of Osmundaceous stems and in the primary bundles of Eristophyton and other Palaeozoic genera is worthy of consideration in this connexion.

=STENOMYELEAE.=

=Stenomyelon.= Kidston.

Stenomyelon tuedianum Kidston. The specimens on which this monotypic genus is founded[474] were obtained from the Lower Carboniferous rocks (Calciferous Sandstone series) at Norham Bridge, Berwickshire, Scotland. They consist of petrified pieces of a flattened stem, a fragment of a rachis and portions of laminae: there is no evidence as to the nature of the reproductive organs. The original form of the stem is obscured by the destruction of a considerable part of the cortex and the consequent flattening of the whole with the production of wing-like extensions of the imperfectly preserved tissues enclosing the almost cylindrical stele (figs. 451, 452).

The stele consists of a bluntly triangular core of primary xylem, 3–4 mm. in diameter, composed almost entirely of reticulately pitted tracheids reaching a diameter of 160μ: a few parenchymatous cells occur in the peripheral region and a band of parenchyma extends from the middle of each of the three sides of the xylem to the centre of the stele, thus dividing the primary conducting tissue into three groups which are the expression of a phyllotaxis of ⅓. The tracheids near the outer face of each xylem-group are narrower than the others and have scalariform pitting. The secondary xylem first appears along the slightly concave sides of the primary stele, eventually enclosing the whole: it consists of tracheids with multiseriate pits on the radial walls and numerous deep medullary rays 1–6 cells broad. No phloem is preserved though it is probable that a narrow band was originally present. A characteristic feature is afforded by a zone of thick-walled cells, regarded as periderm, encircling the stele and formed by a deep-seated phellogen. On the outer face of this band there are projecting bosses, and similar sclerous nests are scattered in the cortex. The outer cortex has a Sparganum[475] type of hypoderm, that is long vertical strands of fibres alternating with parenchyma. The leaf-traces are formed from the blunt angles of the primary xylem; an angle becomes nipped off as a more or less cylindrical strand enclosed by a zone of secondary tracheids which is very narrow on the adaxial side (fig. 452). Protoxylem was recognised only in the leaf-traces and not in the rest of the stele. A pair of protoxylem strands occurs on the outer edge of a prominent angle of xylem before it becomes detached from the stele, and these form a single strand at a lower level. As a leaf-trace passes outwards, the exarch xylem strand becomes mesarch and there is a single protoxylem group except at a point near the bifurcation of a trace. In its passage through the cortex a leaf-trace divides repeatedly, the secondary xylem on the outer face of each strand being retained for a considerable time.

Our meagre knowledge of the nature of the leaves is based on incomplete fragments found in association with the stem. The leaf is believed to have been simple and characterised by a thick lamina with a hypodermal zone of sclerous strands and several vascular bundles.

As Kidston and Gwynne-Vaughan[476] remark, Stenomyelon is a very distinct type; while resembling Sutcliffia in some respects it differs from that genus not only in the structure of the primary stele but in the absence of the system of meristeles which form so characteristic a feature of the latter genus.

=CYCADOXYLEAE.=

=Cycadoxylon.= Renault.

This generic term[477] is applied to a few types of Permian and Upper Carboniferous stems possessing a vascular cylinder, which may reach a considerable breadth, of secondary centrifugally developed xylem and phloem enclosing a large pith containing either a narrow, peripherally placed, and more or less continuous cylinder of inversely orientated conducting tissue or scattered bands of centripetal xylem and phloem. The secondary xylem is manoxylic, while the internal vascular tissue recalls that of Ptychoxylon and to a less extent the inverted arcs that are rarely met with in Lyginopteris stems. A brief diagnosis of two species may serve to illustrate the genus: a third species is included in Cycadoxylon, but it is founded on material too incomplete to admit of satisfactory diagnosis.

Cycadoxylon Fremyi Renault.

This Permian species[478] is represented by a piece of stem 2–2·5 cm. in diameter (fig. 453, B) characterised by (i) a fairly broad parenchymatous cortex with secretory canals and several hypodermal nests of sclerous tissue, (ii) a cylinder of secondary xylem and phloem nearly the whole of which is centrifugal, (iii) a large pith containing several scattered narrower bands or arcs of centripetally developed xylem and phloem. The tracheids, with 4–6 series of hexagonal pits, form radially disposed rows, 1–4 elements broad, separated by broad and deep medullary rays. Renault does not mention the occurrence of any primary xylem as distinct from the secondary centrifugal xylem, but in a section which I examined some years ago in his laboratory there appeared to be a group of primary tracheids. There are no anastomoses between the main cylinder and the internal bands of inversely orientated tissue.

Cycadoxylon robustum (Seward).

This species[479] is based on a piece of stem from the Lower Coal Measures of Lancashire first described by Williamson and identified as an unusually large example of Lyginopteris. Williamson and Scott, while recognising certain features in addition to the large size of the stem, which must have reached 14 cm. in diameter, expressed the view that ‘there is a presumption that it really belonged to a Lyginodendron, or to some plant of the same type of structure.’ The examination of additional material led me to adopt the name Lyginodendron robustum, though I suggested that possibly Cycadoxylon might be the more appropriate genus. Subsequently Scott[480] proposed the substitution of Cycadoxylon for Lyginodendron.

The type-specimen consists of secondary xylem agreeing closely in structure with Lyginopteris and recent Cycads: the pith, 2·9 cm. in breadth, is incompletely preserved; there is a narrow band of centripetal xylem[481] at the periphery of the perimedullary region and close to the inner face of the main mass of wood (fig. 453, C; the black line marks the position of the centripetal xylem). Nests of sclerous tissue and secretory canals are scattered in the medullary parenchyma and deeper in this region are arcs of secondary parenchyma, possibly periderm. In places the centripetal and centrifugal xylem are in contact and occasionally the tapered ends of the rows of centrifugal tracheids merge into groups of primary xylem elements. The preservation in the central region is far from complete, and although the occurrence of primary xylem groups is probable it cannot be said to be positively established. At the inner edge of the centrifugal xylem and in tangential longitudinal sections a few leaf-traces are seen, but nothing is known as to the nature of the leaf-traces in their course beyond the stele nor have we any data with regard to the leaves or reproductive organs.

This older species differs from Cycadoxylon Fremyi in the limitation of the centripetal xylem to the outer portion of the pith and in the presence of sclerous nests in the medullary region, though the latter character is probably of no great taxonomic value. Cycadoxylon robustum approaches more closely to Lyginopteris, and although the differences are sufficient to justify a distinctive generic name, there can be little doubt as to a fairly intimate relationship between this type of Cycadoxylon and Lyginopteris.

=Ptychoxylon.= Renault.

Ptychoxylon[482] Levyi Renault. Like many Palaeozoic genera founded on anatomical features, Ptychoxylon[483] is represented only by stems, our knowledge of the leaves being confined to the leaf-traces in the stem which appears to have a phyllotaxis of ⅜. The stem of this Permian species has a diameter of 5–6 cm.: the comparatively broad cortex contains numerous secretory canals, but in place of hypodermal strands of stereome there is a superficial periderm. The vascular tissue, consisting of secondary xylem and phloem, assumes different patterns at different levels. There is an outer vascular cylinder of centrifugally developed xylem and phloem; the xylem is manoxylic and the tracheids have 3–5 rows of bordered pits on the radial walls. At intervals the continuity of the main stele is broken by the formation of leaf-gaps and before one gap is repaired a second may be produced, thus converting the cylinder into two crescentic and infolded bands (fig. 453, A). A striking character is the occurrence in the large parenchymatous central region of internal vascular bands or arcs varying in size and number at different levels and composed of centripetally developed secondary xylem and phloem. These internal bands differ from the outer and broader cylinder both in their inverse orientation and their limited vertical range. The connexion between the inner and outer vascular tissue and the alteration in plan of the conducting tissue at different levels are illustrated by fig. 453, 1–4, simplified from some of Renault’s figures of successive sections through a vertical distance of 4–5 cm. In section 1 the main cylinder is continuous except for a small gap where a leaf-trace is about to be given off: there are three internal vascular bands similar in structure to the outer stele but inversely orientated. At a higher level (section 2) the leaf-gap is larger and in it is a double leaf-trace of two collateral strands consisting of primary centripetal xylem and a fan-like group of secondary xylem and phloem. The free edges of the outer stele of section 1 have curved inwards and united with the two lateral medullary bands, while the lower internal band of section 1 has increased in extent and forms a discontinuous arc with the upper portions enclosed by the loops formed by the infolded ends of the outer vascular tissue. In section 3 a second leaf-gap has been formed in the outer stele and its invaginated ends have fused with the internal bands. In section 4 the first leaf-gap is closed and the invaginated bands of section 3 have broken up into an irregular circle of shorter bands. The section reproduced in fig. 453, A, shows the main cylinder in the form of two curved and flattened loops, each composed partly of the centrifugally developed xylem and phloem of the main stele and in part of the inversely orientated tissue of the inner bands. At a lower level the two bands b, b, will become detached as the upper leaf-gap is closed and form part of an inner cylinder like the discontinuous ellipse formed by the two bands c. The section of a branch-stele is seen at a.

Ptychoxylon differs considerably from Medullosa, which Renault included in the Cycadoxyleae, in the plan of the vascular system: there is nothing corresponding to the ‘partial pith’ or primary region which forms the central portion of the plate- and snake-rings in Medullosa. The double leaf-trace and the absence of the Medullosa type of hypoderm are other distinguishing features. The paired leaf-bundles suggest comparison with Lyginopteris among other genera and, as Scott[484] points out, the internal arcs of inversely orientated tissue which sometimes occur in the peripheral region of the pith of Lyginopteris (fig. 405, C, c) behave like the internal bands of Ptychoxylon in occasionally joining the main cylinder at a leaf-gap; but the differences outweigh the resemblances. As regards the general arrangement of the vascular tissue in two irregular concentric circles and their connexions with one another, but not in the structure of the xylem and phloem, there is a similarity between this genus and such a Fern as Matonia. In the varying patterns formed by the vascular system at different levels in the stem Ptychoxylon resembles the Ferns Polypodium quercifolium and P. heracleum[485].

=CALAMOPITYEAE.=

=Calamopitys.= Unger.

In 1856 Unger[486] described several fragmentary petrifactions from Thuringian strata of Upper Devonian age, the majority of which he referred to the Calamarieae and the Rhachiopterideae. In an earlier publication[487] he gave a list of species including two families, the Haplocalameae and the Calamoxyleae, assigned by him to the group Calamarieae: in the Haplocalameae he placed the new genera Kalymma, Calamosyrix, Calamopteris, and Haplocalamus. These were subsequently examined by Graf Solms-Laubach and identified as portions of petioles, for the most part belonging to unknown stems. In his second family, the Calamoxyleae, Unger included the single genus Calamopitys represented by the type-species C. Saturni. The type-specimens have been thoroughly investigated by Solms-Laubach[488] who instituted the family-name Calamopityeae and recognised a close anatomical affinity between Calamopitys and Lyginopteris, a conclusion which led to the incorporation of Unger’s genus in the Pteridosperms. Further data have been supplied by Zalessky[489] and, more recently, by Scott and Jeffrey[490] who have recognised Calamopitys in Lower Carboniferous beds in Kentucky.

Calamopitys Saturni Unger.

Our knowledge of this and other species is confined to stems and petioles. One of the largest examples of the species is a piece of stem with a diameter of 1·5 cm.: the single stele consists of a parenchymatous pith enclosed by secondary xylem made up of tracheids with 4–8 rows of bordered pits and medullary rays more than one cell broad and of considerable depth. Between the inner edge of the wood and the pith are groups of primary xylem (fig. 454, B, x) which, like those in Lyginopteris, constitute the leaf-traces: each has a single internal protoxylem strand (fig. 455, B). The comparatively wide cortex consists of parenchyma with a hypoderm of the Sparganum type. Each primary xylem-strand passes out as a single leaf-trace through the secondary xylem and on emerging divides into two as in Lyginopteris: these branch in the cortex and the two are replaced by six in the leaf-base (fig. 454, B–D). As seen in figs. 454, C, 455, A, the boundary between the stem proper and the decurrent leaf-base is marked by a line of stereome strands. The petioles of Calamopitys Saturni agree generally in structure with the imperfect specimens on which Unger founded his genus Kalymma[491], so named in reference to the structure of the hypodermal zone. A specimen described by Solms-Laubach as a Kalymma petiole occurs in organic connexion with a stem of Calamopitys (fig. 454, C: a detached petiole is shown in fig. 454, D). The identification by White[492] of this attached petiole with Unger’s K. grandis has been confirmed by Scott and Jeffrey. A fuller account of Kalymma (fig. 456) is given on a later page, as the petioles so named belong to more than one species of stem.

In Calamopitys Saturni we have a plant agreeing with Lyginopteris in the possession of secondary xylem of the manoxylic type and in the structure of the common primary bundles, while it is distinguished from Lyginopteris by the greater number and by the structure of the bundles in the axis of the leaf.

Calamopitys annularis (Unger)[493].

This species, originally assigned to the genus Stigmaria, has a more strongly developed primary vascular system and there is a more decided tendency towards the formation of a continuous zone of primary xylem on the inner edge of the secondary wood; but where the protoxylem tracheids occur the metaxylem elements form definite strands, like those of C. Saturni. It has been pointed out by Scott and Jeffrey that there is some evidence of the occurrence of tracheids in the parenchymatous pith of this species, an important feature distinguishing it from C. Saturni and connecting it with C. americana. Information with regard to the behaviour of the leaf-traces is far from complete, but there are indications that each trace divides into two before emerging from the secondary xylem[494]. The leaf-traces in the cortex are concentric as in C. Saturni.

Calamopitys americana Scott and Jeffrey.

This Lower Carboniferous species[495] from the Waverley shales of Kentucky is represented by portions of stems and leaf-bases and detached petioles. The secondary wood consists of tracheids, 30–60μ in diameter, with deep and broad rays; the small pits on the tracheids form 5–6 alternating series. Phloem and cambium are very imperfectly preserved. The outer cortex is of the same type as in other species. At the inner edge of the secondary xylem there is a ring of primary xylem strands of mesarch structure composed of rather larger tracheids, 80–120μ in diameter, separated from one another by narrow strips of parenchyma. So far the vascular tissue agrees with that of C. annularis. In the American species the axial region is not a parenchymatous pith but a protostele, consisting of parenchyma and a larger or smaller number of tracheal groups, the number being less in stems with a larger central region. The peripheral strands alone are concerned with the emission of leaf-traces, as in Heterangium. Each primary xylem strand divides into two as it leaves the perimedullary zone and passes through the secondary xylem as two bundles, each being accompanied by an arc of secondary tracheids which, in the cortical region, completely surrounds the primary elements. At a later stage the single protoxylem of each trace divides into two and before entering the leaf-base there is a further division. In some specimens leaf-bases of the Kalymma type were found attached to the stem. The occurrence of tracheids in the axial region is a distinguishing feature and suggests a comparison with Heterangium, while C. Saturni agrees more closely with Lyginopteris; the species C. annularis would appear, from the recent observations of Scott and Jeffrey, to occupy an intermediate position.

Calamopitys, as the generic designation is here employed, is confined to central Germany and Kentucky and occurs in Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous strata. There is, however, some doubt as to the exact geological horizon of the rocks in both countries though in neither case is there any question of an horizon higher than Lower Carboniferous. Certain specimens from the Lower Carboniferous of Scotland described by Scott[496] as species of Calamopitys have been made by Zalessky the type of a new genus, Eristophyton, and are dealt with under that name.

Kalymma. Unger.

Kalymma grandis (petiole of Calamopitys). Under the generic name Kalymma Unger described specimens from Thuringia of Upper Devonian age which he assigned to two species, K. grandis and K. striatum. Solms-Laubach has shown that Kalymma is not an independent stem as Unger believed but a petiole of Calamopitys, and this has been confirmed by Scott and Jeffrey who found a leaf-base with the Kalymma type of structure in connexion with a piece of Calamopitys stem, probably C. americana. An examination of a section (2·3 cm. broad) of Unger’s K. grandis in the collection of the Geological Survey enables me to confirm the conclusions recently published by Scott and Jeffrey. The best specimens of Kalymma, which appear to be identical in essential features with Unger’s type-species, are from Kentucky, some from the Genessee shales of Upper Devonian age and others from beds (Waverley shales) believed to be Lower Carboniferous. Through the kindness of Prof. Bower I have had an opportunity of examining sections from the older horizon in his possession. The transverse section reproduced in fig. 456 has a diameter of 3·8 × 2·2 cm.[497]: on one side the radially placed plates of stereome are clearly shown, and in the outer portion of the ground-tissue is a ring of vascular bundles varying in size and shape but with a general tendency to a radially elongated form. The ground-tissue consists of homogeneous parenchyma: in one place I noticed what appeared to be a large secretory canal, but secretory tissue, generally at least, is unrepresented. The xylem is composed of imperfectly preserved elements, which appear to have scalariform pits; spiral protoxylem strands, embedded in the metaxylem as two or four groups, occur near the ends of the long axis of the bundle and in some cases also near the centre. The phloem probably surrounded the xylem, though it is not certain whether the arrangement was collateral or concentric: there are no secondary-xylem tracheids, though in some places I noticed a tendency to a radial disposition of cells at the periphery of the vascular tissue simulating an early stage of secondary growth. Unger’s second species Kalymma striata is characterised by an arrangement of the bundles similar to that in a petiole described by Scott and Jeffrey as Calamopteris Hippocrepis which differs from Kalymma in the partial substitution of bands of vascular tissue for separate bundles and to some extent in the disposition of the bundles. The two types of petiole Kalymma and Calamopteris, as Scott and Jeffrey state, are very closely allied. Dawson and Penhallow[498] have also described Kalymma grandis from Kentucky but they, like Unger, mistook the hypodermal stereome for an outer zone of vascular bundles. The petioles from Germany and North America included under the name Kalymma grandis, though too similar to be referred to different species, no doubt represent petioles of stems which are unquestionably distinct types: as in the case of Myeloxylon in its relation to the genus Medullosa, Kalymma stands for several closely allied forms of petioles belonging to several species of Calamopitys.

=Eristophyton.= Zalessky.

Eristophyton fasciculare (Scott). The generic name Eristophyton[499] was proposed by Zalessky[500] for two incomplete stems of Lower Carboniferous age provisionally[501] referred by Scott to Araucarioxylon and subsequently to Calamopitys[502]. The species E. fasciculare was founded on material obtained by Dr Kidston from the Lower Carboniferous of Dumbarton, Scotland, and on a specimen in the Williamson collection from Northumberland. There is a small pith of parenchyma, 2–3 mm. in diameter, with eight strands of primary xylem of varying diameter (fig. 457) and in each a single protoxylem-group. The primary xylem elements are considerably larger than the secondary tracheids. These xylem-bundles are leaf-traces and their disposition points to a phyllotaxis of ⅖. The traces attain their maximum size when about to pass out through the secondary xylem. The tracheids are reticulate and scalariform while some have an intermediate type of pitting. A leaf-trace on reaching the pith gradually moves further from the xylem-cylinder and may be separated from it by 2–6 layers of parenchyma: as it passes down the pith the protoxylem strand assumes an almost endarch position consequent on the reduction of the centripetal xylem. In Scott’s words, ‘each circummedullary strand branches at regular intervals; the one branch, that on the anodic side [turned towards the course of the genetic spiral], becomes the leaf-trace and passes out, while the other continues its course up the stem as a reparatory strand, until the next leaf of the orthostichy has to be supplied[503].’ The secondary xylem consists almost entirely of tracheids with 3–4 rows of pits on the radial walls and medullary rays usually one cell broad varying in depth from 1 or 2 to 16 or more cells. A characteristic feature of the secondary xylem is the occurrence on its inner face of numerous short and broad tracheae similar to the still larger tracheae in the primary stele of Megaloxylon[504]. Nothing is known as to the behaviour of the leaf-trace in the extrastelar region, but the fact that an outgoing trace was found to have two protoxylems points to a subdivision similar to that of the foliar bundles of Calamopitys Saturni. A well-marked difference between Eristophyton fasciculare and Calamopitys and Lyginopteris is the more compact structure of the secondary wood; it is pycnoxylic and not manoxylic. Prof. Zalessky in criticising the use of the generic title Calamopitys puts forward several arguments in support of his institution of a new designation: (i) the primary xylem strands of Eristophyton are not confined to the periphery of the pith as is the case in Calamopitys Saturni, though he speaks of one leaf-trace in the latter species separated by several layers of cells from the xylem-cylinder; (ii) some of the pith-cells have thick walls and dark contents in distinction to the homogeneous parenchyma of Calamopitys, a feature of little importance; (iii) the difference in the structure of the secondary wood already alluded to, though this loses some of its significance by the occurrence of narrower rays, more like those of Eristophyton, in C. annularis; (iv) the more elliptical and broader pits in the secondary tracheids in place of the more regular hexagonal form in Calamopitys. While admitting a certain degree of relationship between the two types, Zalessky asserts that as yet we have insufficient evidence to justify their generic union. Scott[505] maintains that Zalessky does not attach sufficient weight to the form and mesarch structure of the primary xylem bundles as a feature common to both genera.

Eristophyton Beinertianum (Goeppert).

1850. Araucarites Beinertianus Goeppert, Mon. Foss. Conif. p. 233, Pls. 42, 43. 1872. Araucarioxylon Beinertianum Kraus, in Schimper’s Trait. Pal. Vol. +ii.+ p. 381. 1888. Araucarites Beinertianus Goeppert and Stenzel, Abh. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. p. 30, Pl. +iv.+ 1902. Calamopitys Beinertiana Scott, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Vol. 40, p. 341, Pls. +i.+, +iv.+, +v.+ 1909[506]. Ullmannites Beinertianus Tuzson, Result. Wiss. Erforsch. Balatonsees, Bd +i.+ Teil +i.+ p. 24. 1911. Eristophyton Beinertianum Zalessky, Com. Geol. St Pétersb. p. 24.

The pith, 13–15 mm. in diameter, is rather larger than in E. fasciculare and is characterised by the occurrence of dark sclerotic nests surrounded by radially disposed rows of parenchyma. The primary xylem strands are more numerous and smaller than in E. fasciculare and these increase in diameter as they approach the secondary wood. In places the primary xylem elements form a more or less continuous band as in Calamopitys annularis. The largest leaf-trace bundles at the periphery of the pith are mesarch (fig. 458), but as each trace passes down the pith the reduction in the centripetal xylem is carried further than in E. fasciculare until the xylem-strand becomes endarch in the lower part of its course. The secondary tracheids have usually two contiguous rows of pits and the medullary rays are one cell broad.

There can be no doubt as to the generic identity of the two species referred to Eristophyton, but the question as to the degree of affinity to Calamopitys is more difficult to settle. There is force in Zalessky’s contention that these two stems should not be retained in Calamopitys: the recently described American species, C. americana Scott and Jeffrey, gives emphasis to the view that the restriction of Calamopitys to the German (and American) types is the safer course. While Calamopitys as thus restricted is almost certainly a Pteridosperm, the inclusion of the types referred to Eristophyton in the same category rests on a more slender basis.

=CLADOXYLEAE.=

This order was founded by Unger[507] for some imperfectly preserved stems from Palaeozoic strata in Thuringia and in it he included the two genera Cladoxylon and Schizoxylon. There is some doubt as to the precise age of the Thuringian beds; they were assigned by Richter to the Devonian system and subsequently placed in the Culm: Solms-Laubach in his later reference to Unger’s plants favours a Devonian horizon[508]. Unger included the Cladoxyleae in the Lycopodiales, and though this conclusion is not accepted the position of the order is still uncertain. His genus Schizoxylon has no claim to generic separation from Cladoxylon. An inspection of the illustrations in the memoir by Richter and Unger reveals a striking resemblance in the main anatomical features between several types assigned to different genera and distributed among the Cladoxyleae and Rhachiopterideae (a term first used by Corda for petrified rachises or petioles of ferns) and other orders. Solms-Laubach[509], to whom our more accurate information as to Unger’s plants is chiefly due, is inclined to regard the specimens referred by Unger to the genus Arctopodium as young stems of Cladoxylon, and he draws attention to a close similarity between Hierogramma, another of Unger’s genera, and Cladoxylon. Paul Bertrand[510] goes further in considering that the following genera represent one generic type, namely Syncardia (fig. 459, F), Hierogramma, Arctopodium, Cladoxylon, and Schizoxylon. The same author interprets the fossils so named by Unger as stems and does not agree with the inclusion of any of them in the Rhachiopterideae. Without losing sight of the fact that Bertrand’s conclusion is not based on proof but is the expression of a view suggested by a close agreement in general anatomical plan, I venture to adopt the designation Cladoxylon in a wide sense primarily on the ground that Bertrand’s view is probably correct and in part for the sake of convenience of description. As Unger’s species of Cladoxylon differ from one another in features which may fairly be regarded as of minor importance, they are included under one specific name.

=Cladoxylon=. Unger.

Cladoxylon mirabile Unger[511]. The following are regarded as specifically identical with or closely allied to Cladoxylon mirabile: C. dubium, Schizoxylon taeniatum, Hierogramma mysticum, Syncardia pusilla, Arctopodium insigne and A. radiatum[512].

i. Stems. The stems assigned to Cladoxylon are characterised by a complex system of steles, either simple or branched and occasionally anastomosing, presenting in transverse section the form of oval or cylindrical strands or narrow, straight or curved bands arranged on a more or less clearly marked radial plan (fig. 459, A, B, D). In some stems the primary vascular tissue is enclosed by secondary xylem and phloem (fig. 460, B), while in others (Unger’s Arctopodium, Hierogramma[513], Syncardia) there is no evidence of secondary thickening. The diagrammatic drawing represented in fig. 459, F, shows a section of a small axis, regarded by Unger and Solms as a petiole (3 mm. in diameter), containing four vascular strands composed exclusively of primary xylem, each with one or, in the case of a double strand, two protoxylem groups. This type may be a slender stem or branch or possibly a petiole. The other extreme, as regards complexity of vascular structure, is represented by such stems as those shown in fig. 459, A, B, D. In Unger’s Cladoxylon mirabile (fig. 459, A; fig. 460, B) the stem reaches a diameter of 3 cm. and consists of several radially disposed plates of vascular tissue with an occasional smaller oval or cylindrical stele embedded in a ground-tissue composed of thick-walled cells. The plates are curved like a UU or sinuous and not infrequently anastomosing. In a section of this type figured by Unger the vascular plates appear to form a complex anastomosing system, but Solms[514] states that the drawing exaggerates the amount of fusion between the strands, and an examination of a section in the collection of the English Geological Survey cut from Unger’s specimen enables me to confirm this statement. Each vascular plate consists of a narrow median region composed of primary tracheids with a scalariform type of pitting surrounded by secondary tracheids with interspersed medullary rays one cell broad. The thickness of the secondary xylem varies considerably in the same specimen and in places this tissue is hardly represented, a fact of importance in view of the very striking resemblance between Arctopodium and Cladoxylon, the sections referred by Unger to the former genus having steles without any secondary xylem. The occurrence of one or two elongated spaces (shown in black in fig. 459, A) near the distal end of each plate mark the position of the protoxylem tracheids. Fig. 459, C, represents a stele of a stem referred by Unger and by Solms to Cladoxylon dubium which shows the typical Cladoxylon structure, namely the central primary xylem with distally placed protoxylem and the enclosing sheath of secondary xylem. In the stem shown in fig. 459, D (C. dubium) there are 12 steles, each constructed on the plan already described, differing in their relatively broader and shorter form and in the greater breadth of the secondary xylem from those seen in fig. 459, A (C. mirabile). The black areas in fig. 459, A, show the primary xylem, and the protoxylem is seen in fig. 459, C. A stem described by Dawson[515] as Asteropteris noveboracensis from Devonian beds is compared by him with Unger’s Cladoxylon mirabile and regarded as possibly allied to it. The radial plates of xylem in Dawson’s plant meet in the centre like those of Asterochlaena and the leaf-traces are of the Clepsydropsoid type.

The type of stem for which Unger founded his genus Schizoxylon is represented in fig. 459, B; there are five small steles in the centre and external to these eleven radially arranged plates, with oval steles between them, in the peripheral region of the stem. Each stele consists of primary (black in the figure) and secondary xylem and agrees with the steles in the other stems.

From the type of stem illustrated by Cladoxylon mirabile to that on which the genera Arctopodium[516] and Hierogramma[517] were founded is a very small step: the vascular tissue has the same characters both as regards gross and minute anatomy, but there is no evidence of cambial activity in the stems referred to the two latter genera, a difference in itself hardly worthy of generic recognition.

ii. Leaves. Before describing a second type of stem referred to Cladoxylon it is important to consider briefly such evidence as we have as to the vascular supply of the leaves. Nothing is known of the reproductive organs and there is no satisfactory information with regard to the form of the fronds. Solms-Laubach has described the only known example of a lateral branch of a Cladoxylon stem (fig. 459, E): this has a single concentric vascular strand of plate-like form with two blunt projections and there are four protoxylem-groups, two in the angle of the plate and two at the base of the projections. The structure is essentially fern-like; the xylem is wholly primary. This type of vascular strand agrees fairly closely with that of a petiole described by Unger as Megalorhachis elliptica, a section of which is in the Museum of the Geological Survey[518]. The petiole is oval in section and laterally winged, and the meristele is tangentially elongated and has two blunt projections almost identical with those in fig. 459, F. There is no evidence as to the nature of the supporting stem, but there can be little doubt as to the close connexion with Megalorhachis and the section shown in fig. 459, F. In a note published in 1908 P. Bertrand stated that he had identified several of Unger’s genera as stems which bore leaf-traces having the form and structure of Clepsydropsis, one of the types referred by Unger to the Rhachiopterideae and described in the second volume of this work[519] as a Coenopteridean petiole. Bertrand points out that in the oval or plate-like steles of Cladoxylon, Arctopodium, Hierogramma, etc., there is a single protoxylem group near the distal end of the primary xylem, and he adds that the leaf-traces were formed of strands cut off from the distal portions of the vascular plates. Similarly the hour-glass-like leaf-trace in the primary rachis of Clepsydropsis gives off from each end a ring of xylem to supply a secondary rachis. These laterally detached annular strands are, he believes, similar to the leaf-trace cut off from the steles in a Cladoxylon stem. The conclusion is that Cladoxylon is a fern stem and its leaf-trace represents the simplest form of the Clepsydropsis type, namely an oval bundle of xylem with a central protoxylem, which is also the form of the trace given off from the stem of Asterochlaena. Solms[520], while admitting that Bertrand may be correct in uniting under one genus Cladoxylon and such types as Syncardia, Hierogramma, and Arctopodium, disagrees with the view that they are Clepsydropsis stems. A Clepsydropsoid leaf-trace has never been found in direct association with any of the stems of the Cladoxylon type and such evidence as there is indicates a leaf-trace of an entirely different form (fig. 459, E). In his more recent memoir on Asterochlaena Bertrand[521] draws attention to Solms’ figures of a stele of Cladoxylon (fig. 459, C) in which the distal portion is on the point of being separated as a small annular strand. This, Bertrand considers, would gradually become converted into a Clepsydropsis form of stele as it passed to the petiole. Bertrand’s drawings made from a section of Cladoxylon taeniatum (Ung.) (fig. 459, G) illustrate successive stages in the departure of a leaf-trace from one of the plate-like steles of the stem (fig. 459, B). In fig. 459, G, 1, a piece of the stele is detached and near its extremity is a group of thin-walled cells with protoxylem: a later stage is seen in fig. 2, and in fig. 3 a small ring of xylem is being detached which, Bertrand assumes, would later in its course be converted into the Clepsydropsoid strand (fig. 4), which consists of primary tissue. The weak point in Bertrand’s contention[522] is the absence of any proof of a true Clepsydropsoid trace in connexion with a Cladoxylon stem, and there is a strong probability that the leaf-trace of Cladoxylon has the form shown in fig. 459, E.

Cladoxylon Kidstoni Solms-Laubach[523].

This species, founded on imperfectly preserved material in Dr Kidston’s collection from Lower Carboniferous rocks in Berwickshire, is referred to Cladoxylon on evidence that cannot be regarded as convincing. The type-specimen consists of a small piece of stem about 3 cm. in breadth showing three complete oval steles and portions of two others which seem to be in their original position and probably formed part of a series of peripheral steles such as those shown in fig. 459, D. Each stele consists mainly of secondary xylem (fig. 460, A) with some crushed tissue, presumably phloem, on its outer face. The secondary xylem is narrower on the inner side of each stele where a wedge-shaped piece is partially detached. In the centre there is a narrow area parallel to the long axis of the stele containing crushed tissue which probably consists of parenchyma and primary xylem, but the preservation is very imperfect. The secondary xylem has a fairly compact structure and the rays are narrow, 1–10 cells in depth. The pits of the tracheids are described by Solms as scalariform with occasionally two rows of elliptical pits on the radial walls. A careful examination of the type-specimen leads me to describe the pits as uniseriate and transversely elongated, very like those of Protopitys, or biseriate and almost circular like those of Conifers, the pits of the two rows being alternate or sometimes opposite (fig. 460, C): in places three rows of bordered pits are present. There is a certain degree of resemblance between the steles of this species and those of the South African stem Rhexoxylon[524], but the data are inadequate for a satisfactory comparison.

There is a close similarity between the vascular systems of Cladoxylon and Medullosa, but an obvious difference is the substitution of the oval, transversely elongated, pits on the xylem elements for the multiseriate pitting of Medullosa. In Cladoxylon Kidstoni the pitting shows transitional forms between a narrow scalariform uniseriate type and a biseriate or triseriate arrangement similar to that in the Araucarineae and Cordaitales. In Cladoxylon, as limited by Unger, the presence of secondary wood is a generic feature, but by the inclusion of Arctopodium and other forms this character no longer holds good. The inclusion of these more fern-like stems without secondary xylem brings Cladoxylon (in the wider sense) into closer contact with Asterochlaena, a comparison previously suggested by more than one author. In Medullosa the development of secondary xylem is on a larger scale than in Cladoxylon, and the vascular system of the former genus assumes a more complex form. Moreover the Myeloxylon type of petiole, which is a distinctive feature of Medullosa, differs widely from any form of leaf-trace associated with Cladoxylon.

=Völkelia.= Solms-Laubach.

Völkelia refracta (Goeppert). The generic name Völkelia[525] was proposed by Solms-Laubach[526] as a substitute for Sphenopteris[527] in the case of some petrified stems or petioles associated with fragmentary impressions of fronds from Lower Carboniferous rocks in Silesia. Both leaf-impressions and petrifactions were included in the genus Sphenopteris: Solms, while retaining Goeppert’s designation for the leaf fragments, proposed a new generic name for the petrifactions on the ground that there is insufficient evidence of their connexion with the leaves. The short account of Goeppert’s petrified specimen given by Graf Solms-Laubach in his ‘Fossil Botany[528]’ is supplemented by a fuller description in a later paper. The fragments of highly compound fronds are characterised by very small filiform ultimate segments, but the specimens are too imperfect to afford a clear idea of the habit of the leaf. The ‘stem’ bears a close superficial resemblance to that described by Unger as Cladoxylon dubium (fig. 459, C, D) and was regarded by him as an example of that species: it contains several radially placed steles represented by fairly well-preserved xylem, but no phloem has been recognised. The steles vary in size and shape: five reach almost to the centre (fig. 461, A) and smaller xylem groups occupy a peripheral position. Each stele is excentric in structure and consists of (i) an outer zone of secondary tracheids of horse-shoe form in transverse section, but the apparent gap in the secondary xylem on the outer edge of each stele is due to the crushing of the tracheal tissue and to its smaller breadth in the distal part of each group; this is shown in fig. 461, B, where the apparent gap is seen to be occupied by distorted and crushed tracheids, a, identical with those which form the rest of the outer zone (fig. 461, B, b); (ii) a zone of tracheal tissue continuous with and originally identical in appearance—except that the elements are rather narrower—with the outer secondary xylem; (iii) an excentrically situated island composed of tracheids enclosing a small central area occupied by thin-walled parenchyma. This third region, represented by black patches in fig. 461, A, in all probability represents the primary part of each stele to which the rest of the tissue has been added by the cambium. A striking feature of the secondary xylem is the absence of medullary rays: the tracheids resemble those of Cladoxylon and Protopitys in the transverse elongation of the pits (fig. 461, D) which form either a single row or several irregularly distributed rows. The primary xylem consists in the peripheral region of tracheids with very narrow scalariform pitting which at first sight suggest close spiral bands (fig. 461, C), while the inner tracheids are either annular or reticulate and associated with elongated parenchyma. The imperfectly preserved ground-tissue appears to consist of homogeneous parenchyma with radially disposed bands of stereome in the outer cortex.

Our knowledge of Völkelia, though far from complete, justifies its generic separation from Cladoxylon from which it differs in the lack of medullary rays and in the structure of the primary portion of each stele. In the form and arrangement of the pits in the secondary tracheids Völkelia differs from Medullosa and resembles Cladoxylon. The opinion expressed by P. Bertrand[529] that Völkelia is probably the stem of one of the Zygopterideae is based on the older accounts of the genus and not on the fuller description of 1910.

=PROTOPITYEAE.=

=Protopitys.= Goeppert.

The only species so far described is that for which Goeppert founded the genus in 1850, substituting Protopitys[530] for the name Araucarites, adopted in an earlier paper, on the ground that the structure of the xylem denoted a distinct generic type. The type-species is from the Upper Devonian rocks of Falkenberg in Silesia.

Protopitys Buchiana Goeppert.

1845. Araucarites Buchianus Goeppert, in Wimmer’s Flor. Schlesien (edit. +ii.+) p. 218. 1847. Pinites Goepperti Unger, Chlor. Protog. p. 31. 1847. Dadoxylon Buchianum Endlicher, Syn. Conif. p. 300. 1850. Protopitys Buchiana Goeppert, Foss. Conif. p. 229, Pl. +xxxvii.+ figs. 4–7; Pl. +xxxviii.+ figs. 1, 2.

In his Monograph of Fossil Conifers Goeppert figured a large piece of stem consisting mainly of secondary wood and described the more important anatomical features. He recognised the narrow, transversely elongated, pits on the radial walls of the tracheids as a feature of special interest indicating a type of pitting transitional between that of Ferns and Conifers. A further description was given by Kraus[531] who included under Goeppert’s name both the Falkenberg stem and a second specimen from Basel though the latter is Triassic in age and a distinct plant; he suggested a comparison of Protopitys with Sigillaria and Stigmaria rather than with Conifers. It is, however, to Graf Solms-Laubach[532] that we owe the most thorough account of this species. Nothing is known of the leaves or reproductive organs. The largest piece of stem is nearly 1 ft in diameter and consists mainly of secondary xylem resembling that of Conifers and Cordaites except in the form of the bordered pits on the radial walls of the tracheids (fig. 462, D). The centre of the stem is occupied by a parenchymatous pith, elliptical in transverse section, enclosed by a band of primary xylem composed of large polygonal tracheids (fig. 462, C, _x_¹) characterised by a delicate scalariform pitting on all their walls (fig. 462, E). The primary xylem forms a narrow layer on the sides of the ellipse, 1–3 elements broad (fig. 462, A, B), but it increases in breadth at the ends of the long axis where the tracheids are intermixed with parenchyma. The primary xylem and pith-tissue at the ends of the major axis of the central region assume different forms at different levels, owing to the detachment of leaf-traces and the consequent formation of foliar gaps as portions of the primary xylem pass obliquely outwards into the secondary xylem on the way to the distichously arranged alternate leaves. The diagram, fig. 462, A, shows the inner part of the secondary xylem (see also fig. 462, C, x²) which at one end, lt, has formed an oval group about to pass out as a leaf-trace: at the opposite end the strand is detached and divided into two equal branches. The two swellings of the primary xylem ellipse shown at a in figs. 462, A and B, are a characteristic feature: these are clearly seen after the leaf-trace has become detached; at the inner edge of each of them there appears to be a protoxylem strand. After the formation of a foliar gap these swellings of the xylem gradually meet and so re-establish continuity below the outgoing leaf-trace. No protoxylem has been detected in the actual trace, which is believed to be concentric. The formation of the leaf-gap and the shoulders bordering it constitute interesting filicinean features, recalling corresponding characters in solenostelic Ferns. At the upper end of the diagram, fig. 462, B, the outgoing leaf-trace is undergoing dichotomy while at the opposite end the trace has passed out of view. The secondary xylem shows incomplete rings or arcs of narrower elements, which at first sight give the impression of annual rings: the occurrence of similar incomplete or pseudo-rings is a common feature in Lepidodendron and other Palaeozoic stems. The secondary tracheids (54·4μ in tangential diameter, 68·5μ in radial diameter) have usually a single series of broadly oval bordered pits on the radial walls with here and there two rows (fig. 462, D). In one case only were the pits of the medullary rays recognised (fig. 462, F). The rays are uniseriate, generally 1–2 cells deep, but occasionally 3 cells in depth and very rarely deeper. The cambium is of the normal type, and in some specimens secondary phloem was found consisting of bands, 4–5 layers broad, of stone-cells alternating with tubular thin-walled elements, presumably sieve-tubes.

As Solms-Laubach says, it is highly probable that each leaf-trace, which forks close to its exit from the primary xylem, became further subdivided before reaching the leaf. Morphologically, Protopitys is of special importance as a type possessing characters that indicate a connexion with Conifers or Cordaitean genera, notably the structure of the secondary wood, while the presence of foliar gaps is a feature reminiscent of Ferns. The primary xylem resembles that of some of the Palaeozoic arborescent Lycopodiales, but in Protopitys the interruptions in this tissue are due to the emission of leaf-bundles, whereas in the discontinuous primary xylem of some Sigillarias[533] the gaps have no connexion with leaf-traces. Moreover the distichous leaves of Protopitys and the larger, branched, leaf-traces are other distinguishing features. The pitting of the primary xylem is like that in the Lycopodiales and Filicales, while that of the secondary wood shows a closer approach to the coniferous type. A comparison may also be made with the transversely elongated pits of Cladoxylon Kidstoni[534].

A piece of wood agreeing anatomically with the Silesian species of Protopitys has been found in the Yoredale rocks of England[535].

The peculiarities of the genus have been emphasised by Solms-Laubach by the institution of a family-name Protopityeae: the genus is essentially a generalised type exhibiting in the structure of its stem both Filicean and Coniferous features. The bordered pits differ from those in recent Conifers in their flatter form, but in this respect they exhibit a closer agreement with the transversely stretched pits of Xenoxylon phyllocladoides Goth.[536], a Mesozoic species.

Spotted a typo or a problem in this chapter? Tell us